Melvin,
Linked Open Colors was something made for fun, which is very different
to a joke. It only provides instances of colors based on some of their
different representations. For what your are looking for, here a
couple of vocabularies that would be useful:
2012/1/26 Sergio Fernández sergio.fernan...@fundacionctic.org:
Melvin,
Linked Open Colors was something made for fun, which is very different
to a joke. It only provides instances of colors based on some of their
different representations. For what your are looking for, here a
couple of
Hi Melvin
There are a few resources in the LOV database which might be of interest
http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov/search/#s=color
Bernard
2012/1/26 Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com
I see hasColor a lot in the OWL documentation but I was trying to work
out a way to say something
I see hasColor a lot in the OWL documentation but I was trying to work
out a way to say something has a certain color.
I understand linked open colors was a joke
Anyone know of an ontology with color or hasColor as a predicate?
As far as I remember when it was announced, Linked Open Colors was not
really a joke. It was clearly something made for fun, but it was also
trying to usefully model colors according to Linked Data principles.
Le 26/01/2012 00:15, Melvin Carvalho a écrit :
I see hasColor a lot in the OWL
On Jan 25, 2012, at 3:15 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
I see hasColor a lot in the OWL documentation but I was trying to work
out a way to say something has a certain color.
I understand linked open colors was a joke
Anyone know of an ontology with color or hasColor as a predicate?
On 2012-01 -26, at 00:15, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
I see hasColor a lot in the OWL documentation but I was trying to work
out a way to say something has a certain color.
I understand linked open colors was a joke
Anyone know of an ontology with color or hasColor as a predicate?
In
