Berlin
www.georgikobilarov.com
-Original Message-
From: public-lod-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-lod-requ...@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Andraz Tori
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:02 PM
To: Hugh Glaser
Cc: public-lod@w3.org
Subject: Re: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1
]
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 4:29 PM
To: Georgi Kobilarov; Andraz Tori; Hugh Glaser
Cc: Linked Data community
Subject: Re: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?
Georgi, All,
If we don't reward the Linked Data publishers who provide clean data
and
penalize those who
...@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Andraz Tori
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 4:02 PM
To: Hugh Glaser
Cc: public-lod@w3.org
Subject: Re: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?
Hi Hugh,
I think you are mixing two completely different goals.
Why can't one set of people
On 2/8/09 10:50 AM, Andraz Tori wrote:
On the other hand, the major problem of semantic web is lack of
_incentives_ for publishers to publish data in clean semantic form.
I am working on one of the initiatives to change that and it will
hopefully see light of the day soon.
Andraz,
Hausenblas michael.hausenb...@deri.org, Andraz Tori
and...@zemanta.com, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Cc: Linked Data community public-lod@w3.org
Subject: RE: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?
Hi Michael,
Looking forward to find and use a respective voiD description
Hello!
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
My proposal:
*We should not permit any site to be a member of the Linked Data cloud if it
does not provide a simple way of finding URIs from natural language
identifiers.*
Rationale:
One aspect of our Linking
Hi Hugh,
The OpenCyc ontology has English strings for its terms, and a search
facility at
http://sw.opencyc.org/
Sorry, no Tim Berners-Lee (yet), but if you type Tim it will
auto-complete and show you Tim Duncan and the other Tims we have.
We also have links to DBpedia for many of our terms.
dbpedia: wanted Tim again. After clicking on a few web pages, none of
which
seemed to provide a search facility, I resorted to my usual method:-
look it
up in wikipedia and then hack the URI and hope it works in dbpedia.
(Sorry to name specific sites, guys, but I needed a few examples.
And
FWIF, my 0.02€:
I think Hugh has a point there: lower the barrier for interested people in
the domain to chip in. Hence, an entry point should be provided, which is
simple enough to be used by quite everyone.
Experience (in the realm of linked data applications) tells that it is quite
always
.org
Subject: DBpedia Lookup RE: Can we lower the LD entry cost please
(part
1)?
dbpedia: wanted Tim again. After clicking on a few web pages, none
of
which
seemed to provide a search facility, I resorted to my usual method:-
look it
up in wikipedia and then hack the URI and hope
This is one of the issues I am trying to address with http://t4gm.info.
There the notion of autocomplete filtering for SKOS concepts combined with
content negotiation allows one to have one's cake and eat it too, at least
as far user-friendly URL lookup is concerned; because of the use of
RE: Can we lower the LD entry cost please (part 1)?
Resent-From: Linked Data community public-lod@w3.org
Resent-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 15:19:30 +
dbpedia: wanted Tim again. After clicking on a few web pages, none of
which
seemed to provide a search facility, I resorted to my usual method
On 2/7/09 10:18 AM, Georgi Kobilarov wrote:
oh, it was my laziness that kept me from announcing it publically yet,
but since Hugh is complaining about the lack of URI search functionality
in DBpedia, here it is:
http://lookup.dbpedia.org
and web service
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 8:15 AM, David Baxter retx...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Hugh,
The OpenCyc ontology has English strings for its terms, and a search
facility at
http://sw.opencyc.org/
Sorry, no Tim Berners-Lee (yet), but if you type Tim it will
auto-complete and show you Tim Duncan and
Many thanks for all the stimulating response to brighten up this dreary
Saturday and help me to avoid the things I really have to do.
A digest of some of my further responses (so it is easy to ignore me all at
once if you want!):
On 07/02/2009 15:02, Andraz Tori and...@zemanta.com wrote:
Hi
Hello!
Sorry, I just cannot accept that a SPARQL endpoint is th esort of thing that
we should be expecting new casual users to try to use, even with a query
builder.
You made the point about linkage systems - I was answering to that.
I am not suggesting casual users should write SPARQL
Yves,
just on the side, yes there is not much dbtune in sindice. just a few
http://sindice.com/search?q=dbtuneqt=term
if you have an RDF dump of the site or of part of it and you express
it in a semantic sitemap you would be indexed full in very short time
. Otherwise we should have the ne
On 07/02/2009 19:57, Yves Raimond yves.raim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
Sorry, I just cannot accept that a SPARQL endpoint is th esort of thing that
we should be expecting new casual users to try to use, even with a query
builder.
You made the point about linkage systems - I was answering
18 matches
Mail list logo
