Hi Dave,
On 2012-05-17, at 16:56, David Wood wrote:
Hi Steve,
On May 17, 2012, at 11:18, Steve Harris wrote:
On 2012-05-16, at 23:09, David Wood wrote:
Still, Kingsley is right, too. We are certainly busier than we have ever
been, with no clear end in sight. That's positive.
It
+1 +1
On 18 May 2012, at 13:18, Steve Harris wrote:
Hi Dave,
On 2012-05-17, at 16:56, David Wood wrote:
Hi Steve,
On May 17, 2012, at 11:18, Steve Harris wrote:
On 2012-05-16, at 23:09, David Wood wrote:
Still, Kingsley is right, too. We are certainly busier than we have ever
Hello Bernard,
I really hope they have delivered something people (outside this community)
will find useful. Otherwise you will perhaps be happy that they tried to
take all the credit. As you said, it's not completely news and the expectations
are great.
Regards,
Michael Brunnbauer
On Thu,
On 16/05/2012 23:55, Bernard Vatant wrote:
Kingsley says they have Freebase, yes but Freebase stores only 22
million entities according to their own stats, which makes less than
5% of the overall figure, since Google claims 500 million nodes in the
Knowledge Graph, and growing. So I guess
On 5/17/12 10:06 AM, Barry Norton wrote:
On 16/05/2012 23:55, Bernard Vatant wrote:
Kingsley says they have Freebase, yes but Freebase stores only 22
million entities according to their own stats, which makes less than
5% of the overall figure, since Google claims 500 million nodes in
the
On 2012-05-16, at 23:09, David Wood wrote:
On May 16, 2012, at 17:45, Bernard Vatant wrote:
Thanks to all who had this ground ploughed and sown patiently since those
dark ages where Google was all but an idea.
Now the grain is ripe and it's a great time for them to harvest ... hope we
On 2012-05-17, at 00:04, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 5/16/12 6:55 PM, Bernard Vatant wrote:
Adrian
Don't dream of accessing the Google Knowledge Graph and query it through a
SPARQL endpoint as you do for DBpedia. As every Google critical
technological infrastructure, I'm afraid it will
On May 17, 2012, at 12:22 - 17/05/12, Steve Harris wrote:
And it will be query accessible, this is something that's inevitable and
unavoidable. This is the Web.
I doubt it. Google don't even allow API access to their search engine. I can
still remember the days when they were a
On 5/17/12 11:18 AM, Steve Harris wrote:
Still, Kingsley is right, too. We are certainly busier than we have
ever been, with no clear end in sight. That's positive.
It would feel much more positive if I thought we were trying to solve
the right problems. It would be much easier to know if I
On 5/17/12 11:22 AM, Steve Harris wrote:
On 2012-05-17, at 00:04, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 5/16/12 6:55 PM, Bernard Vatant wrote:
Adrian
Don't dream of accessing the Google Knowledge Graph and query it
through a SPARQL endpoint as you do for DBpedia. As every Google
critical technological
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Barry Norton barry.nor...@ontotext.comwrote:
On 16/05/2012 23:55, Bernard Vatant wrote:
Kingsley says they have Freebase, yes but Freebase stores only 22 million
entities according to their own stats, which makes less than 5% of the
overall figure, since
On 5/16/12 4:02 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
Big thumbs up (at least in principle) from google on linked data
http://googleblog.blogspot.de/2012/05/introducing-knowledge-graph-things-not.html
+1000...
It's getting real interesting. Google and Facebook as massive Linked
Data Spaces, awesome!
On 5/16/12 5:45 PM, Bernard Vatant wrote:
Thanks to all who had this ground ploughed and sown patiently since
those dark ages where Google was all but an idea.
Now the grain is ripe and it's a great time for them to harvest ...
hope we are left with some crumbs to pick up as a reward of our
On May 16, 2012, at 17:45, Bernard Vatant wrote:
Thanks to all who had this ground ploughed and sown patiently since those
dark ages where Google was all but an idea.
Now the grain is ripe and it's a great time for them to harvest ... hope we
are left with some crumbs to pick up as a reward
Hi All,
Nice videos etc, but has anyone found a link to actually *use* Knowledge
Graph ?
If it's not online yet, one wonders why Google chose to pre-announce it.
Thanks, -- Adrian
Internet Business Logic
A Wiki and SOA Endpoint for Executable Open Vocabulary English Q/A over
On 5/16/12 6:25 PM, Adrian Walker wrote:
Hi All,
Nice videos etc, but has anyone found a link to actually *use*
Knowledge Graph ?
If it's not online yet, one wonders why Google chose to pre-announce it.
Thanks, -- Adrian
Cos Linked Data changes behavior :-)
This is a
Subject: Re: Introducing the Knowledge Graph: things, not strings
On 5/16/12 6:25 PM, Adrian Walker wrote:
Hi All,
Nice videos etc, but has anyone found a link to actually *use* Knowledge Graph ?
If it's not online yet, one wonders why Google chose to pre-announce it.
Thanks
... To put it in a longer way.
Yes this is great news, although it's not completely news, we had quite a
few hints of it by Google in the past months.
But what is just unfair is Google presenting this as if they had invented
it. Apart from a quick allusion to DBpedia and Freebase, no mention of
On 5/16/12 6:33 PM, Amit Krishna Joshi wrote:
Good news for all of us in the semantic web community. Just wondering
why Google is reluctant to use 'semantic' word even once in the blog
http://googleblog.blogspot.de/2012/05/introducing-knowledge-graph-things-not.html.
As they say: its
Adrian
Don't dream of accessing the Google Knowledge Graph and query it through a
SPARQL endpoint as you do for DBpedia. As every Google critical
technological infrastructure, I'm afraid it will be well hidden under the
hood, and accessible only through the search interface. If they ever expose
On 5/16/12 6:55 PM, Bernard Vatant wrote:
Adrian
Don't dream of accessing the Google Knowledge Graph and query it
through a SPARQL endpoint as you do for DBpedia. As every Google
critical technological infrastructure, I'm afraid it will be well
hidden under the hood, and accessible only
On May 16, 2012, at 20:04 - 16/05/12, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 5/16/12 6:55 PM, Bernard Vatant wrote:
Adrian
Don't dream of accessing the Google Knowledge Graph and query it through a
SPARQL endpoint as you do for DBpedia. As every Google critical
technological
On 5/16/12 8:32 PM, Daniel Schwabe wrote:
On May 16, 2012, at 20:04 - 16/05/12, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 5/16/12 6:55 PM, Bernard Vatant wrote:
Adrian
Don't dream of accessing the Google Knowledge Graph and query it
through a SPARQL endpoint as you do for DBpedia. As every Google
23 matches
Mail list logo
