On 2014-10-02 01:48, Pablo N. Mendes wrote:
I never claimed it was not social. But as it is often the case, it may
be rooted in or (falsely) justified by technical misinformation.
You are right, that is of course likely. However, based on the feedback,
the bottleneck is about OC passing on
On 2014-10-01 22:32, Pablo N. Mendes wrote:
It may help to preemptively address concerns here. Does anyone have a
HTML+CSS(+RDFa) template that looks exactly like the LNCS-formatted
PDFs? Can we show that papers using this template:
- look consistent with each other (follow the LNCS typesetting
Sarven, great work! We definitely need more initiatives like yours.
It seems to me a big hindrance to this adoption is more sociologically than
technological.
A quick suggestion - in the current thread we have people saying HTML/RDFa
-- LaTeX - why not the other way around?
Having LaTeX --
Hey all,
is there any established and/or widely supported LaTeX XML schema?
I have found several projects, but not sure how much they're used:
- http://dlmf.nist.gov/LaTeXML/
- http://getfo.org/texml/
- http://www-sop.inria.fr/marelle/tralics/
If there would be an agreed XML schema, it would be
Actually LaTeXML seems to do pretty much I what I was thinking about:
http://dlmf.nist.gov/LaTeXML/manual/usage/usage.single.html#SS0.SSS0.P7
Could be packaged in a more user-friendly way though.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Martynas Jusevičius
marty...@graphity.org wrote:
Hey all,
is
I never claimed it was not social. But as it is often the case, it may be
rooted in or (falsely) justified by technical misinformation.
Sorry for having missed the discussions that addressed these concerns.
Thanks for reiterating, because others may have missed them too. Perhaps we
should go even
