Re: Visualizing LOD Linkage

2008-08-06 Thread Peter Ansell
- Yves Raimond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! It depends on whether you know that the external references are distinct just based on the URI string. If someone links out to multiple formats using external resource links then they would have to be counted as multiple links as you

Re: Visualizing LOD Linkage

2008-08-06 Thread Yves Raimond
Hello! Hello! It depends on whether you know that the external references are distinct just based on the URI string. If someone links out to multiple formats using external resource links then they would have to be counted as multiple links as you have no way of knowing that they are

Re: Visualizing LOD Linkage

2008-08-06 Thread Peter Ansell
- Yves Raimond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! Hello! It depends on whether you know that the external references are distinct just based on the URI string. If someone links out to multiple formats using external resource links then they would have to be counted as

sameAs proliferation (was Visualizing LOD Linkage)

2008-08-06 Thread Hugh Glaser
On 06/08/2008 09:54, Yves Raimond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! ... I am not sure if I interpret it correctly - do you mean that you could link to two URIs which are in fact sameAs in the target dataset? Indeed, in that case, the measure would be slightly higher than what it should

Re: Visualizing LOD Linkage

2008-08-06 Thread Hugh Glaser
D¹accord. My bit: We suspect that links have different value, and would like to capture that in some way. But that would be lots of numbers etc. And we would like to capture inbound links, but that is a full research project. But somehow I do think that I might like to know separately sameAs v.

Re: Visualizing LOD Linkage

2008-08-06 Thread Kingsley Idehen
Peter Ansell wrote: - Yves Raimond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! It depends on whether you know that the external references are distinct just based on the URI string. If someone links out to multiple formats using external resource links then they would have to be

RE: planet.linkeddata.org now live

2008-08-06 Thread Tom Heath
Hi Kingsley, -Original Message- From: Kingsley Idehen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 August 2008 16:14 To: Tom Heath Cc: public-lod@w3.org Subject: Re: planet.linkeddata.org now live Tom Heath wrote: Hi all, In the name of continuing the Linked Data outreach effort,

Fwd: [backstage] Muddy Boots + BBC Music Beta

2008-08-06 Thread Yves Raimond
Hello! I thought this would be interesting for this list, as an example of a service using several LOD sources. However, it is a bit sad they don't expose the data they produce as linked data themselves - perhaps we should have a GPL-like license for LOD datasets if you derive data from this

RE: [backstage] Muddy Boots + BBC Music Beta

2008-08-06 Thread Chris Sizemore
I'm sure they will expose the data if we ask ;-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yves Raimond Sent: 06 August 2008 16:34 To: public-lod@w3.org Subject: Fwd: [backstage] Muddy Boots + BBC Music Beta Hello! I thought this would be

RE: [backstage] Muddy Boots + BBC Music Beta

2008-08-06 Thread Michael Smethurst
another bit of a joined up bbc.co.uk clunks into place... mainly thru the efforts of you people if u were all in london and the bbc paid me enough i'd buy you all beers : ) btw: http://www.slideshare.net/fantasticlife/semweb-at-the-bbc is a presentation i gave (badly) the other day to various

Yo! Good timing, Re: ANN: SCOT specification

2008-08-06 Thread Dwight Hines
are you using SCOT in any financial applications? Law enforcement applications, like white collar crimes? see below, dh Final Report of the Advisory Committee on Improvements to Financial Reporting to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission Prepared by: SEC Advisory Committee on

RE: Fwd: [backstage] Muddy Boots + BBC Music Beta

2008-08-06 Thread Chris Sizemore
as i say, the Muddy Boots folks are very LOD-centric and dbpedia-sympathetic, so we should just mention these constructive criticisms to them and i'm sure they'll be taken seriously. also to note is that their work is the result of a BBC commission that i was involved with, so i expect the BBC

Re: Fwd: [backstage] Muddy Boots + BBC Music Beta

2008-08-06 Thread Kingsley Idehen
Chris Sizemore wrote: as i say, the Muddy Boots folks are very LOD-centric and dbpedia-sympathetic, so we should just mention these constructive criticisms to them and i'm sure they'll be taken seriously. also to note is that their work is the result of a BBC commission that i was

Re: Visualizing LOD Linkage

2008-08-06 Thread Peter Ansell
Thanks, I wasn't implying that people did use it ;) I was just a little confused at that stage but it was cleared up in following emails. Cheers, Peter - Original Message - From: Kingsley Idehen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: public-lod@w3.org Cc: public-lod@w3.org Sent: Wednesday, 6 August,

Re: ANN: SCOT specification

2008-08-06 Thread Karl Dubost
Le 7 août 2008 à 01:31, Kim, Haklae a écrit : We are happy to announce that an initial version of SCOT specification has recently been published athttp://scot-project.org/scot/spec . To give more context to the readers who might not know. The abstract of the DERI Galway Working Draft