Sherman Monroe wrote:
Kingsley wrote:
There are half a dozen Entities across N graphs in the Quad Store.
The UI issue here is that we don't show the source Graphs in the
results page. Reason, we know we can actually provide distinct
results cheaper than listing the Graph Names
Hi Richard!
As Matthias already told you, you should have a look at loomp
(http://loomp.org). I have to mention that this is ongoing development
but we have recently developed a typolight plugin which allows you to
pull content from loomp into your CMS as XHTML/RDFa. Have a try and feel
free to
David,
On 2009-05 -18, at 07:20, David Huynh wrote:
Sherman Monroe wrote:
[...] For example, when I search for Microsoft on Google, the first
result not only IS what I want, but also LOOKs like what I want. I
can make the decision to click on it within maybe 1 or 2 seconds.
The URL
It might be better to say owning the description of an URI.
The Semantic Web allows anyone can say anything anywhere, so we
cannot stop people adding more descriptions to a URI. As seen in
Swoogle Term search, many URIs have been defined by many places: the
official address' indicated by the
It is important to track the ownership (further provenance) of the
description of URI. we may want to know who published the definition,
and where the definition is copied from. Being able to connect RDF
triples with authors is an important step towards the social semantic
web.
In my proposal
I think a key point of David's original post, which I would like to
emphasize, is that if I use a URL to refer to a web page, the owner is
generally either readily visible (in the URL) or discoverable (via
domain lookup). When I represent a term as a URL, it is at least known
who is
Hi:
While we can traditionally buy domain name and own the URI, people
You do not buy domain names. You register domain names. It might be
generally helpful to use the proper terminology.
From the InterNIC FAQ:
How long does a registration last? Can it be renewed?
Each registrar has
David Huynh wrote:
Sherman Monroe wrote:
Kingsley wrote:
There are half a dozen Entities across N graphs in the Quad Store.
The UI issue here is that we don't show the source Graphs in the
results page. Reason, we know we can actually provide distinct
results cheaper than
Wolfgang Orthuber wrote:
It is important to track the ownership (further provenance) of the
description of URI. we may want to know who published the definition,
and where the definition is copied from. Being able to connect RDF
triples with authors is an important step towards the social
John Graybeal wrote:
I think a key point of David's original post, which I would like to
emphasize, is that if I use a URL to refer to a web page, the owner is
generally either readily visible (in the URL) or discoverable (via
domain lookup). When I represent a term as a URL, it is at least
David Huynh wrote:
John Graybeal wrote:
I think a key point of David's original post, which I would like to
emphasize, is that if I use a URL to refer to a web page, the owner
is generally either readily visible (in the URL) or discoverable (via
domain lookup). When I represent a term as a
David,
I guess I'm just trying to close the gap between Google's search
results--which people are familiar with--and razorbase's or any novel
search engine's results. For example, when I search for Microsoft on Google,
the first result not only IS what I want, but also LOOKs like what I
Kingsley,
The view we have is this:
1. Hook into Google and Yahoo and MSFT for pages and even apply a weighting
or our algorithm so that Google|Yahoo|MSFT first page will be the same as
ours (* this is deliberately not part of the LOD instance since sponging is
disabled for now*)
2. Extend
David wrote:
[...] For example, when I search for Microsoft on Google, the first result
not only IS what I want, but also LOOKs like what I want. I can make the
decision to click on it within maybe 1 or 2 seconds. The URL
www.microsoft.com in that search result is perhaps the most convincing
Tim,
Tim Berners-Lee wrote:
On 2009-05 -18, at 07:20, David Huynh wrote:
Sherman Monroe wrote:
[...] For example, when I search for Microsoft on Google, the first
result not only IS what I want, but also LOOKs like what I want. I
can make the decision to click on it within maybe 1 or 2
=
We apologies if you receive multiple copies of this announcement.
Please disseminate this CFP in any lists you subscribed and among
your colleagues/students. We also take this chance to invite you
(or anyone from your research
David,
Why can't the semantic web track 'whois' information of domain ownership,
and maybe even SLL certificate information, of sites and be aware of the
social relationships, and use them intelligently? (perhaps more safely than
a human who will be confused by
Kingsley,
What I wanted to say is that the existing system for registration of domain names can be also efficiently used
to
initiate well defined task sharing in the definition of a global vocabulary for the semantic web, using a
simple standard as proposed in my initial email of today.
If
Sherman Monroe wrote:
David wrote:
[...] For example, when I search for Microsoft on Google, the
first result not only IS what I want, but also LOOKs like what I
want. I can make the decision to click on it within maybe 1 or 2
seconds. The URL www.microsoft.com
If there is no explicit official standard and recommendation for such global
task sharing, there is the
danger that those who need a special vocabulary develop many incompatible
standards for exchange of machine
readable data.
The earlier such a standard for well defined task sharing is
David Huynh wrote:
Tim,
Tim Berners-Lee wrote:
On 2009-05 -18, at 07:20, David Huynh wrote:
Sherman Monroe wrote:
[...] For example, when I search for Microsoft on Google, the first
result not only IS what I want, but also LOOKs like what I want. I
can make the decision to click on it
21 matches
Mail list logo
