Hi Jeni:
Agree with this:
a normal developer would want to just get:
[{
book: http://example.org/book/book6;,
title: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
},{
Wondered if you'd seen the JSONC proposal coming from the Google Data API
work:
Hi,
As part of the
(Sorry for my last post. That'll learn me for composing in place.
Hamfistedly hit the wrong buttons.)
Hi Jeni:
Agree with this:
a normal developer would want to just get:
[{
book: http://example.org/book/book6;,
title: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
},{
In message c74badc3.20683%t.hamm...@nature.com, Hammond, Tony
t.hamm...@nature.com writes
Normal developers will always want simple.
Surely what normal developers actually want are simple commands whereby
data can be streamed in, and become available programmatically within
their chosen
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Richard Light
rich...@light.demon.co.uk wrote:
In message c74badc3.20683%t.hamm...@nature.com, Hammond, Tony
t.hamm...@nature.com writes
Normal developers will always want simple.
Surely what normal developers actually want are simple commands whereby data
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Jeni Tennison j...@jenitennison.com wrote:
Richard,
My opinion, based on the reactions that I've seen from enthusiastic,
hard-working developers who just want to get things done, is that we (the
data.gov.uk project in particular, linked data in general) are
Hi Damian:
Sorry 'bout that. I did indeed include the wrong link (I was logged in at at
the time). DeWitt's mail on the OpenSearch list is here:
http://groups.google.com/group/opensearch/msg/f2f724e0e3123150
Here he's advocating JSONC as a possible (and practical) way forward.
Cheers,
Tony
Hi Richard,
Isn't:
Give 'em RDF and tell them to develop better toolsets ...
exactly the approach that the RDF community has been pursuing for a
decade or two, with less than impressive results?
;)
Regards,
Mark
--
Mark Birbeck, webBackplane
mark.birb...@webbackplane.com
In message
eb19f3360912140143m291c464brb76379d3cc2b0...@mail.gmail.com, Dan
Brickley dan...@danbri.org writes
RDF tooling still has some rough edges, it must be said. I am as
enthusiastic about RDF as anyone (having been involved since 1997) but
I've also seen the predictable results where on
Hi Richard,
Despite the Bah, Humbug! tone of my previous mail, I am actually in favour
too. I just want to tease out the extent to which we would be giving
developers what they say they want, rather than what they could actually
use.
The value of JSON is surely that JSON support is
In message
eb19f3360912140217w109daf1ah3c9320fa3363d...@mail.gmail.com, Dan
Brickley dan...@danbri.org writes
With every passing year the RDF tools do get a bit better, but also
the old ones code rot a bit, or new things come along that need
supporting (GRDDL, RDFa etc.). What can be done in
Jeni Tennison wrote:
On 12 Dec 2009, at 22:27, Danny Ayers wrote:
I can't offer any real practical suggestions right away (a lot to
digest here!) but one question I think right away may some
significance: you want this to be friendly to normal developers - what
kind of things are they actually
Jeni Tennison wrote:
It's worth noting that most of these APIs support a callback= parameter
that makes the API return Javascript containing a function call rather
than simply the JSON itself. I regard this as an unquestionably
essential part of a JSON API, whether it uses RDF/JSON or RDFj or
Hi Jenni,
Jeni Tennison wrote:
On 13 Dec 2009, at 13:34, Dave Reynolds wrote:
I agree we want both graphs and SPARQL results but I think there is
another third case - lists of described objects.
I absolutely agree with you that lists of described objects is an
essential part of an API.
Mark Birbeck wrote:
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Jeni Tennison j...@jenitennison.com wrote:
One thing that we want to do is provide JSON representations of both RDF
graphs and SPARQL results. I wanted to run some ideas past this group as to
how we might do that.
Great again. :)
In the
On Monday 14. December 2009 11:17:37 Dan Brickley wrote:
I wish that kind of funding was easy to come
by, but it's not. A lot of the work we need to get done around here to
speed up progress is pretty boring stuff. It's not cutting edge
research, nor the core of a world-changing startup, nor a
Very early days yet, but started a simple OS OpenSpace map interface for
sameas.org.
I hope to extend this to all administrative/voting regions in GB.
But just to get going:
http://www.johngoodwin.me.uk/boundaries/constsameas.html
John
This email is only intended for the person to whom it is
2009/12/14 Richard Light rich...@light.demon.co.uk:
In message c74badc3.20683%t.hamm...@nature.com, Hammond, Tony
t.hamm...@nature.com writes
Normal developers will always want simple.
Surely what normal developers actually want are simple commands whereby data
can be streamed in, and
17 matches
Mail list logo
