Correct Usage of rdfs:idDefinedBy in Vocabulary Specifications with a Hash-based URI Pattern

2010-09-30 Thread Martin Hepp
Dear all: We use rdfs:isDefinedBy in all of our vocabularies (*) for linking between the conceptual elements and their specification. Now, there is a subtle question: Let's assume we have an ontology with the main URI http://purl.org/vso/ns All conceptual elements are defined as

Re: Correct Usage of rdfs:idDefinedBy in Vocabulary Specifications with a Hash-based URI Pattern

2010-09-30 Thread Michael Hausenblas
Martin, Opinions? We had the same discussion in the voiD team, see [1], and resolved it eventually - hope this helps. Cheers, Michael [1] http://code.google.com/p/void-impl/issues/detail?id=45 -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise

Re: Correct Usage of rdfs:idDefinedBy in Vocabulary Specifications with a Hash-based URI Pattern

2010-09-30 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 9/30/10 3:06 AM, Martin Hepp wrote: Dear all: We use rdfs:isDefinedBy in all of our vocabularies (*) for linking between the conceptual elements and their specification. Now, there is a subtle question: Let's assume we have an ontology with the main URI http://purl.org/vso/ns All

Re: Correct Usage of rdfs:idDefinedBy in Vocabulary Specifications with a Hash-based URI Pattern

2010-09-30 Thread Martin Hepp
Hi Kingsley, Thanks - that is what I had assumed. Note, however, the majority of the Web vocabularies use the same URI for the entity name reference and the descriptor reference, see the link provided by Michael Hausenblas: http://code.google.com/p/void-impl/issues/detail?id=45

Call for Papers - MUE 2011 (Crete, Greece, June 28-30, 2010)

2010-09-30 Thread Robert C. Hsu
[Please accept our apologies if you receive multiple copies of this email] *** IEEE/FTRA MUE-2011 CFP * The 5th IEEE/FTRA