Hugh Glaser wrote:
Hi,
To put it in simple terms for me :-)
Are you after the algorithms we use to identify when two instances are the same?
Best
Hugh
Yes !
François
On 11/06/2009 12:57, François Scharffe francois.schar...@inria.fr wrote:
Dear LODers,
There has been a couple of
Hi,
* Francois said, initially:
There has been a couple of discussions already on this list on the need
for a vocabulary to represent correspondences between terms of different
vocabularies
* Hugh asked:
Are you after the algorithms we use to identify when two instances
are the same?
*
Hi,
I think we all want to do the same thing: aligning vocabularies in order
to enhance interoperability in the cloud. There is the top-down
approach: aligning vocabularies first, and using the alignment to
provide functionalities for the data. For example, if Google releases a
dataset using
Hello!
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Danny Ayersdanny.ay...@gmail.com wrote:
Really good to see this work!
May be nothing, but...it appears the tagging date is associated with
the tag. I assume most systems would want to infer that tags with the
same meaning were equivalent (even though
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 12:15 +0200, Peter Mika wrote:
Indeed, you cannot do this merging: a ctag:Tag refers to the tagging
event. So the concepts they refer to (ctag:means) might be the same, the
Tags are not.
Then http://commontag.org/mapping is wrong. It states:
ctag:Tag
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 11:47 +0100, Toby Inkster wrote:
In essence it seems ctag:Tag is a sort of hybrid between tag:Tagging
and tag:Tag. There's nothing wrong with that per se, but it does mean
that your mappings to Richard Newman's tag ontology are probably never
going to work especially
François Scharffe wrote:
Hugh Glaser wrote:
Hi,
To put it in simple terms for me :-)
Are you after the algorithms we use to identify when two instances
are the same?
Best
Hugh
Yes !
François
So if the answer is Yes. Then do you mean things in the ABox and TBox?
Must be clear here as
François Scharffe wrote:
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
François Scharffe wrote:
Hugh Glaser wrote:
Hi,
To put it in simple terms for me :-)
Are you after the algorithms we use to identify when two instances
are the same?
Best
Hugh
Yes !
François
So if the answer is Yes. Then do you mean
Peter, maybe you could explain why you guys found it useful to date tagging
events in the first place. I suppose the point of it might be that it could
provide some context? If so, the date is only one aspect of the context and
probably not the richest one.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Danny
Maybe others can comment as well, but I do think it's an important piece
of information, e.g. to determine recently popular tags.
Cheers,
Peter
François Dongier wrote:
Peter, maybe you could explain why you guys found it useful to date
tagging events in the first place. I suppose the point of
François,
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:07 AM, François
Scharffefrancois.schar...@inria.fr wrote:
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
François Scharffe wrote:
Hugh Glaser wrote:
Hi,
To put it in simple terms for me :-)
Are you after the algorithms we use to identify when two instances are
the same?
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 10:31 -0400, Valeska Oleary wrote:
It’s hard to comment without understanding the use cases and
scenarios, but high level speaking I’m inclined to think date is a
valuable piece of information to most publishers.
I imagine the date of publication of an article, plus dates
2009/6/12 Peter Mika pm...@yahoo-inc.com
Maybe others can comment as well, but I do think it's [taggingDate] an
important piece of information, e.g. to determine recently popular tags.
In my very humble opinion, **who** tagged a resource with ctag T at time t
could also be a very useful
Francois -
Agree - I think knowing who created a tag is an important annotation.
The thought was that you could mix in another vocabulary's property
like foaf:maker for things like that.
Common Tag is simply a small skeleton for representing the basic Tag
structure. The hope was people
Hi,
2009/6/10 Ian Davis li...@iandavis.com:
We will also be blogging constantly highlighting cool uses of the data on
the Talis Platform developer blog at http://blogs.talis.com/n2/
These posts are are now accumulating under the bbc tag on the blog,
so if you're not already signed up to the
Leigh Dodds wrote:
Hi,
2009/6/10 Ian Davis li...@iandavis.com:
We will also be blogging constantly highlighting cool uses of the data on
the Talis Platform developer blog at http://blogs.talis.com/n2/
These posts are are now accumulating under the bbc tag on the blog,
so if you're
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Toby Inkstert...@g5n.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 01:33 +0200, Andraz Tori wrote:
also to note is that there exist proper mappings to other efforts at
tagging ontologies:
http://commontag.org/mappings
The question is though, will Search Monkey, Sindice,
17 matches
Mail list logo
