Tom Heath wrote:
Hi Chris, all,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Sizemore
Sent: 04 April 2008 13:38
To: public-lod@w3.org
Cc: Michael Smethurst; Silver Oliver; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: imdb as linked open data?
all--
Richard Cyganiak wrote:
On 9 Jul 2008, at 00:11, Bijan Parsia wrote:
[big snip]
Complaining that the Big Nasty People Who Know What They're Talking
About are raining on your sameAs parade isn't constructive.
Ah Bijan. How about *you* grow up, flameboy?
(Please soften your language, both of
Hi folks
(sorry for not chiming in on LOD list before btw; I tried to join
sometime back but it got wedged, but I think that was the old MIT-hosted
list anyways)
Richard Cyganiak wrote:
I don't think this is a problem. For provenance purposes, whatever works
for RDF/XML documents will
Richard Cyganiak wrote:
Hi Mark,
On 14 Jul 2008, at 10:22, Mark Birbeck wrote:
I would say that RDFa has made the situation an order of magnitude
_less_ complicated, since authors and developers now have an easier
way to publish metadata;
Well, RDFa has made life simpler for those
David Huynh wrote:
[snip]
[many thanks for opensourcing btw!!]
Maybe there's a chance to collaborate here, what do you think?
I'm also not aware of any upcoming semweb UI workshops. WWW2009 might be
a good place...
We can carry on this conversation off the list.
Please don't dissapear
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Ed Summers wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Giovanni Tummarello
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really support your idea for a lod cloud that's actually useful to
write queries, i promise we'll do the best from sindice to deliver one
such a thing.
That
This is with the plain HTML tables on Wikipedia but should be fun for
DBPedia folks too...
Dan
Original Message
Subject: [mySociety:public] An actually useful mash-up
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:17:20 +0100
From: Francis Irving [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: mySociety:Public
Azamat wrote:
Monday, November 17, 2008 2:11 PM, Chris Bizer wrote:
'We are happy to announce the release of DBpedia version 3.2. ... More
information about the ontology is found at:
http://wiki.dbpedia.org/Ontology'
While opening, we see the following types of Resource, seemingly Entity
Chris Bizer wrote:
I think that the basic idea of the Semantic Web is that you reuse existing
terms or at least provide mappings from your terms to existing ones.
I'd say a rather than the; there are various key themes of the SW -
Term-reuse sure; but also common approaches to
Andreas Langegger wrote:
Hi,
does anybody know of a working and feasible vocabulary browser?
I'm thinking of some neat (preferably web-based) GUI which allows to
load (autom. via some API in the back or manually by the user) several
vocabularies which are possibly interlinked either
Sergio:
do we want to create this (artificial) URIs?
Richard:
You don't state any reasons against using URIs, you just say that you
prefer not to use them. So please clarify: What do you gain by not
introducing your own URI?
There are a few considerations...
One reason to be avoid
On 12/2/09 13:45, Georgi Kobilarov wrote:
Hi Matthias,
It works with HTTP GET as well, see the web-service descriptions at [1]
and [2] (scroll down a bit).
[1] http://lookup.dbpedia.org/api/search.asmx?op=KeywordSearch
[2] http://lookup.dbpedia.org/api/search.asmx?op=PrefixSearch
Cheers,
+cc: Robert, Yves
On 17/2/09 21:52, Simon Reinhardt wrote:
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
We have a new Musicbrainz dump, and it will be integrated into DBpedia
(I think Georgi is working on this). There will soon be a publicdump
available to others in the coming days.
Did you consider working
On 17/2/09 23:41, Yves Raimond wrote:
Hello!
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Dan Brickleydan...@danbri.org wrote:
+cc: Robert, Yves
On 17/2/09 21:52, Simon Reinhardt wrote:
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
We have a new Musicbrainz dump, and it will be integrated into DBpedia
(I think Georgi is
On 23/2/09 18:53, David Baxter wrote:
Hi all,
We at Cycorp have been publishing owl:sameAs links from our OpenCyc
concepts to WordNet synsets, e.g.
http://sw.opencyc.org/2008/06/10/concept/en/India owl:sameAs
http://www.w3.org/2006/03/wn/wn20/instances/synset-India-noun-1
We've done so with
On 23/2/09 20:04, Danny Ayers wrote:
2009/2/23 Matthias Samwaldsamw...@gmx.at:
In
contrast, I would still prefer an established, generic property to something
that needs to be invented anew. rdfs:seeAlso is established (which also
means that people are more likely to re-use it then
On 23/2/09 20:32, Frederick Giasson wrote:
Hi Dan,
Certainly a useful concept to have name(s) for, ... but I think not
quite what is needed to link these specific datasets. The W3C wordnet
data is a collection of descriptions of linguistic concepts. The
OpenCyc things they're linked to are not
On 23/2/09 22:24, Mike Bergman wrote:
David Baxter wrote:
We at Cycorp have been publishing owl:sameAs links from our OpenCyc
concepts to WordNet synsets, e.g.
http://sw.opencyc.org/2008/06/10/concept/en/India owl:sameAs
http://www.w3.org/2006/03/wn/wn20/instances/synset-India-noun-1
We've
On 28/2/09 21:49, Joshua Tauberer wrote:
Not related to this thread, but this just in:
The LOD cloud was just on a slide presented at
http://transparencycamp.org for the future of http://www.recovery.gov,
the website for tracking spending in the U.S.'s economic recovery
package. Very thrilling
On 1/3/09 01:30, Giovanni Tummarello wrote:
congrats and kudos to all those who've made this happen. I think the
cloud diagrams are proving a very compelling visual for people who
don't care about nerdy detail but understand the idea of interlinked
datasets.
Yes they're great
On 2/3/09 15:23, Daniel Schwabe wrote:
On 02/03/2009 10:55, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
...
De-referencable URIs, Negotable Representation of Resource
Descriptions, and other elements of the Linked Data Web's FORCE as are
simply there to be tapped by current/next generation of innovators on
the Web
On 6/3/09 10:21, Yrjänä Rankka wrote:
Georgi Kobilarov wrote:
Hi Kingsley,
DESCRIBE http://dbpedia.org/resource/London takes 3 minutes to
execute on lod.openlinksw.com ...
It took only a few seconds when I tried it. Takes time to warm up a pan
of this size, as is the case with any DBMS. As
On 12/5/09 12:14, Steve Harris wrote:
On 12 May 2009, at 10:49, John Goodwin wrote:
Hi,
I was just curious how many OWL sceptics we have in the LOD community?
Rightly or wrongly I get the impression there are a few?
OWL hasn't historically been very practical over large datasets, but I
have
On 13/5/09 15:23, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
I desperately hope that you can see the Google is providing a huge
opportunity to showcase Linked Data meme value. Again, so what -- if
they don't use existing vocabularies? What matters is that they are
using RDFa to produce structured data, and that is
On 20/5/09 07:44, David Huynh wrote:
Sherman Monroe wrote:
That's when I was turned on
to Frame Semantics, which I immediately praised, it is by far the most
expressive and elegant knowledge representation framework for NL I
have come across (although, it's been 3 or 4 years since I really
On 22/5/09 19:47, Pat Hayes wrote:
Yes, that's a great topic for discussion. It is clear that semantic
drift is a natural part of natural language: a word that meant one thing
years ago may mean something quite different now.
And the same is happening with URIs. My favorite example is
On 25/5/09 17:45, David Booth wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 20:49 +0200, Dan Brickley wrote:
On 22/5/09 19:47, Pat Hayes wrote:
David Booth wrote:
Yes, that's a great topic for discussion. It is clear that semantic
drift is a natural part of natural language: a word that meant one thing
years
On 26/5/09 14:45, Wolfgang Orthuber wrote:
[...]
Though different HTTP URIs always refer to different addresses
Where do you get this from?
Do you mean though different HTTP URIs are different URIs?
http://example.com:80/foo
and
http://EXAMple.COM/foo
...both address (or fail to address)
On 26/5/09 16:19, Wolfgang Orthuber wrote:
Dan,
can a http URI refer transiently or accidentally to some address?
Which term do you suggest for something which permanently refers to a
(unique, permanent) web address, and which differs if and only if the
web address differs?
I don't think
On 26/5/09 17:44, Ed Summers wrote:
I forgot to mention that if you are interested in reading more about
the use of the Object Reuse and Exchange vocabulary (OAI-ORE) in
linked data, and web based digital repositories you'll want to check
out this recent paper from LDOW2009:
H. Van de
On 30/5/09 15:50, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Danbri: have you had time to work on the generic faceted browsing spec
we discussed a few weeks ago? Even a rough dump Wiki-style will do re.
getting all interested parties engaged.
Nothing written up yet, but am just back from a digital libraries
(I changed subject line again, sorry but to avoid misleaing further :)
OK, you goaded me into writing up what I was thinking about...
On 31/5/09 21:09, Andreas Harth wrote:
Hi,
Dan Brickley wrote:
Basic idea in a nutshell is that SPARQL is great for data access, but
there may be additional
On 1/6/09 17:14, Tom Heath wrote:
Hi Dan,
2009/6/1 Dan Brickleydan...@danbri.org:
On 1/6/09 10:48, Tom Heath wrote:
Hi Dan,
2009/5/31 Dan Brickleydan...@danbri.org:
On 31/5/09 10:40, Tom Heath wrote:
Hi Michael,
The proposed time (7pm on the 1st) clashes with the LarKC Reception;
from a
Excuse the 3-way crosspost, but I think it's quite important to
strengthen the links between W3C Social Web, Semantic Web / linked data
and data portability discussions. For those in or near San Jose, there's
a Data Portability community meeting happening, with details below. This
should be
On 4/6/09 01:54, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
Hugh, Ian,
Great work -- simple, visually attractive, does what it says on the tin.
A pleasure to use.
Yup! :)
I think it would be pretty cool to make it
#this owl:sameAs U1, U2, U3, U4 .
That way, I could add a nice triple to my FOAF file:
#cygri
On 4/6/09 10:45, Hugh Glaser wrote:
Might it be possible to have the site offer
URIs, and some commitment they'll probably be around for a few years (or
somehow opensourced to collaborative maintainance if Southampton decide
not to maintain it later?).
No :-)
Thanks for the clear answer :)
On 5/6/09 10:16, Knud Hinnerk Möller wrote:
Hi Luciano,
a lot of RDF libraries will do this for you. I usually use the rapper
tool [1], which comes with the Redland RDF API. Another option I find
nice is cwm (which can do a lot of other things as well) [2].
Cheers,
Knud
[1]
On 15/6/09 08:41, Giovanni Tummarello wrote:
We are currently processing from 500 to 5 pings per day in
sindice. (this is excluding semantic sitemaps, and excluding crawler
findings)
We are now scaling using hadoop, so that each one is completely
reassoned upon (closure of all the imported
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Licensing_update/Implementation
[[
As per the licensing update vote result and subsequent Wikimedia
Foundation Board resolution, any content on Wikimedia Foundation
projects currently available under GFDL 1.2 with the possibility of
upgrading to a later version
On 18/6/09 13:31, Bernard Vatant wrote:
Rob, Danny (and Dan)
... why not use simply dc:creator and dc:date to this effect?
Right. dc:date would seem a good choice, though I reckon foaf:maker
might be a better option than dc:creator as the object is a resource
(a foaf:Agent) rather than a
On 18/6/09 15:07, Thomas Baker wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 01:49:56PM +0200, Dan Brickley wrote:
Well I actually meant dcterms:creator when I wrote dc:creator, sorry. So
you can link your personal tags to your foaf profile, for example.
And it's consistent even for tag:AutoTag, since
[snip]
Yup, re owl:imports, I enthusiastically added it to the FOAF spec when
some OWL WG insider suggested it was the right thing to use, and
dutifully removed it when someone (I forget who in both cases - quite
possibly same person!) a few years later told me it had fallen from
fashion
On 22/6/09 23:16, Martin Hepp (UniBW) wrote:
Yves Raimond wrote:
Ontology modularization is
a pretty difficult task, and people use various heuristics for deciding what
to put in the subset being served for an element. There is no guarantee that
the fragment you get contains everything that
On 23/6/09 09:33, Martin Hepp (UniBW) wrote:
Hi Dan:
I think Alan already gave examples this morning. An ontology can contain
statements about the relationship between conceptual elements - classes,
properties, individuals - that (1) influence the result to queries but
(2) are not likely
Interesting discussion!
On 25/6/09 14:15, Simon Reinhardt wrote:
Hi
Bernhard Schandl wrote:
[1] http://www.ifs.univie.ac.at/schandl/2009/06/domain+range_bad.png
[2] http://www.ifs.univie.ac.at/schandl/2009/06/domain+range_better.png
I like this. The former has several problems anyway: you
On 26/6/09 10:51, Toby Inkster wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 09:35 +0200, Dan Brickley wrote:
Does every major RDF toolkit have an integrated RDFa parser already?
No - and even for those that do, it's often rather flaky.
Seseme/Rio doesn't have one in its stable release, though I believe one
http://sw.opencyc.org/2008/06/10/concept/Mx4rv8L0_JwpEbGdrcN5Y29ycA
says it is owl:sameAs dbpedia:Spaced
And DBpedia reports the same. They're both wrong! The DBpedia page is
about a television situation comedy show; the Cyc page is about a
freeware computer game.
cheers,
Dan
On 30/6/09 13:33, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Dan Brickley wrote:
(I was reminded about the SW bug tracker after posting this; good idea)
http://sw.opencyc.org/2008/06/10/concept/Mx4rv8L0_JwpEbGdrcN5Y29ycA
says it is owl:sameAs dbpedia:Spaced
And DBpedia reports the same. They're both wrong
On 1/7/09 17:51, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Linked Music Data or Linked Open Music Data, either provides a clear
moniker for a music oriented Linked Data Space on the Web :-)
It does rather suggest the music files are up there too. And I wouldn't
complain if they were... :)
Dan
I don't normally forward conference CFPs, but it seems it would be
useful to build some links with this community. Aw crap, can't believe I
typed that. But you know what I mean...
Dan
Original Message
Subject:2nd CFP: ISWC'09 workshop on Ontology Matching (OM-2009)
On 10/7/09 12:23, Juan Sequeda wrote:
Steve is right.
If I am not wrong, when TBL gave his talk at CERN for the 20th
aniversary of the web, he said that he was amazed that people were
hacking HTML by hand. He never expected it.
Now... we are the geeks doing RDF, conneg, linked data by hand...
On 20/7/09 11:01, Danny Ayers wrote:
Second Life objects to become HTTP-aware :
http://www.massively.com/2009/07/08/second-life-objects-to-become-http-aware/
cool, right? well not exactly, it uses shortlived-by-design URIs:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/LSL_http_server
Well, we can't have
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Aldo Bucchi aldo.buc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I found a dataset that represents countries as two letter country
codes: DK, FI, NO, SE, UK.
I would like to turn these into URIs of the actual countries they represent.
( I have no idea on whether this follows an
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Dave Reynolds
dave.e.reyno...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Jeni,
[Rest of post snipped for now, I'll respond properly later. Seems like we
are on sufficiently similar wavelengths that it is just a matter of
working the details.]
I don't know where the best place
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Richard Light
rich...@light.demon.co.uk wrote:
In message c74badc3.20683%t.hamm...@nature.com, Hammond, Tony
t.hamm...@nature.com writes
Normal developers will always want simple.
Surely what normal developers actually want are simple commands whereby data
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Jeni Tennison j...@jenitennison.com wrote:
Richard,
My opinion, based on the reactions that I've seen from enthusiastic,
hard-working developers who just want to get things done, is that we (the
data.gov.uk project in particular, linked data in general) are
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Daniel O'Connor
daniel.ocon...@gmail.com wrote:
Psst, Chris, Tobias - any chance of RDFBookMashup rendering 'owl:sameAs
urn:isbn:12434567' ?
I might see if I can glue freebase's 1.8 million or so ISBNs onto
rdfbookmashup.
It's probably common knowledge, but
Hi all
http://www.idpf.org/2007/opf/OPF_2.0_final_spec.html#AppendixA defines
a Dublin Core-based XML metadata format used for ebooks.
This is very nice but a little disconnected from other Dublin Core
data in RDF. It would be great to have some XSLT to explore closer
integration and use of
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Ross Singer rossfsin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I have a question about something I've run across when trying to
parse the RDF coming from the BBC. If you take a document like:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/artists/72c536dc-7137-4477-a521-567eeb840fa8.rdf
notice
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Georgi Kobilarov
georgi.kobila...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Matthias,
So you're asking for the perfect entity recognition service, applicable to
the easy domain of scientific texts? Sure, I developed one in my spare time,
it's much better than OpenCalais, I was just too
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Ying Ding dingy...@indiana.edu wrote:
Hi,
If you are interested to know the Semantic Web: Who is who from the
perspective of Scopus and Web Of Science, recently we conduct a bibliometric
analysis in this field
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Damian Steer d.st...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
Historical aside:
On 17/02/10 11:20, Hugh Glaser wrote:
More recently I have also badged as Web of Data;
See [1], since 1998 :-) It's been used fairly regularly since then, although
I'd highlight [2] as a
On 17 Feb 2010, at 18:14, Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote:
On Feb 17, 2010, at 6:37 AM, Dan Brickley wrote:
... . RDF was originally
standardised as a metadata system, a mechanism for finding stuff ...
whether that stuff was photos, videos, HTML pages, excel
spreadsheets,
SQL databases
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote:
Does anyone know of URIs which identify colors? Umbel has the general notion
of Color, but I want the actual colors, like, you know, red, white, blue and
yellow. I can make up my own, but would rather use some already out there,
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Dan Connolly conno...@w3.org wrote:
The proposal from the editors and chairs it that it is not needed;
i.e. not cost-effective.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Feb/0794.html
Dan B., your message suggests (without actually saying so) that
On 21 Mar 2010, at 12:47, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
Hi Kingsley, I am right with you - finding stuff is hard.
But I do think we could make it easier for all of us.
Just the esw wiki alone requires me to put every set I create into a
bunch of places
10 years ago, looking for
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Yves Raimond yves.raim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
We are in the process of rolling out some links to DBpedia over in BBC
Programmes. However, we are facing a small issue. We use our own
categorisation scheme based on SKOS, and then want to add some sameAs
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Yves Raimond yves.raim...@gmail.com wrote:
Is that an issue? Should we drop SKOS altogether if we go on with
that, or should we use skos:exactMatch instead of owl:sameAs?
see also http://wiki.foaf-project.org/w/term_focus
I'm running out of excuses for not
[snip]
Couple of almost-independent points -
Re DBpedia, I share a concern that the Wikipedia turned into a
database product remain fairly clearly defined, even though the
RDFization naturally includes a bit of creativity. However even that
has subtleties - there are the different language
But I love it :) Do the numbers include dates?
Dan
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Matthias Samwald samw...@gmx.at wrote:
Hi Denny,
I am sorry, but I have to voice some criticism of this project. Over the
past two years, I have become increasingly wary of the excitement over large
numbers
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Martin Hepp (UniBW)
martin.h...@ebusiness-unibw.org wrote:
Hi Denny:
Without spooling your All Fools' Day joke: I think it is a dangerous one,
because there is obviously a true core in the expected criticism.
I think that without any need, you give outsiders
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Leigh Dodds leigh.do...@talis.com wrote:
Hi,
Yes.
PDF: http://patterns.dataincubator.org/book/linked-data-patterns.pdf
EPUB: http://patterns.dataincubator.org/book/linked-data-patterns.epub
Something of a tangent but this reminds me, what's the latest on RDF
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Pierre-Antoine Champin
swlists-040...@champin.net wrote:
Even more tangent, but when I read in detail the XMP spec last year (in
relation to the Media Annotation WG), I came to two conclusions:
- XMP specifies RDF at the level of the XML serialization, which is
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Some have cleaned up their act for sure.
Problem is, there are others doing the same thing, who then complain about
the instance in very generic fashion.
They're lucky it exists at all. I'd refer them to this
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Daniel Koller dakol...@googlemail.com wrote:
Dan,
...I just setup some torrent files containing the current english and german
dbpedia content: (.. as a test/proof of concept, was just curious to see how
fast a network effect via p2p networks).
To try, go to
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Ian Davis wrote:
When you use the term: SPARQL Mirror (note: Leigh's comments yesterday re.
not orienting towards this), you open up a different set of issues. I don't
want to revisit SPARQL and SPARQL extensions
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Ian Davis wrote:
When you use the term: SPARQL Mirror (note: Leigh's comments yesterday re.
not orienting towards this), you open up a different set of issues. I don't
want to revisit SPARQL and SPARQL extensions
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Ian Davis li...@iandavis.com wrote:
Kingsley,
You should address your question directly to the project organisers,
we're a technology provider and host some of the data but it is not up
to us when or where the dumps get shared. My understanding is that
+cc: Ed Summers
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Chris Sizemore
chris.sizem...@bbc.co.uk wrote:
the main problem is gonna be the cognitive dissonance over whether a tweet
is an information or non-information resource and how many URIs are needed
to fully rep a tweet...
so, who's gonna
around the concept of 'linkage', I think it'll go a long
way towards explaining what we're up to with RDF.
Thoughts?
Dan
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dan Brickley dan...@danbri.org
Date: Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:52 AM
Subject: backronym proposal: Universal Resource Linker
To: u
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Wonder what would happen if we just called them Links?
I think that would confuse people. And would put stress just on the
point where SemWeb and HTML notions of link diverge.
An HTML page can have two (hyper-)links, a
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Ian Davis m...@iandavis.com wrote:
When talking to people who aren't semweb engineers then i use
URL/URI/link interchangeably. I don't think it matters because the 1%
that care will look it all up and get the distinction and the rest
will just get on and use
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Jeni Tennison wrote:
Kingsley,
On 15 Apr 2010, at 23:19, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Do you have any idea as to the whereabouts of RDF data sets for the
SPARQL endpoints associated with data.gov.uk?
[...]
One thing
2010/6/3 Haijie.Peng haijie.p...@gmail.com:
[Apologies for cross-posting]
Why should we publish ordered collections or indexes as RDF? is it necessary?
On the Web, very little is 'necessary'. But some things can be useful.
Indexes and summaries can help software prioritise, and allow larger
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Stuart A. Yeates syea...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Dave Reynolds
dave.e.reyno...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 17:06 +1200, Stuart A. Yeates wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Dave Reynolds
dave.e.reyno...@googlemail.com
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 3:07 PM, William Waites william.wai...@okfn.org wrote:
On 10-06-03 09:01, Dan Brickley wrote:
I don't find anything particularly troublesome about the org: vocab on
this front. If you really want to critique culturally-loaded
ontologies, I'd go find one that declares
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:17 PM, William Waites william.wai...@okfn.org wrote:
On 10-06-07 23:03, Emmanouil Batsis (Manos) wrote:
b) what happens when organizations change legal status?
I'm not certain but I don't think this ever really
happens. In practice the old organisation ceases to
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:21 PM, William Waites william.wai...@okfn.org wrote:
On 10-06-08 04:27, Todd Vincent wrote:
By adding OrganizationType to the Organization data model, you provide
the ability to modify the type of organization and can then represent
both (legal) entities and (legally
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Peristeras, Vassilios wrote:
Hello all,
I have the feeling that we are (at least partly) reinventing the wheel
here. There have been several initiatives drafting generic models and
representations for
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Paul Groth pgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I've wrapped the Slideshare.net API to expose it as RDF. You can find a blog
post about the service at [1] and the service itself at [2]. An interesting
bit is how we deal with Slideshare's API limits by letting you
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Angelo Veltens
angelo.velt...@online.de wrote:
Hi,
Ian Davis schrieb:
Hi all,
Now we are getting a steady growth in the number of Linked Data sites,
products and services I thought it was time to create a low-volume
announce list for Linked Data related
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote:
On Jun 30, 2010, at 6:45 AM, Toby Inkster wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:54:20 +0100
Dan Brickley dan...@danbri.org wrote:
That said, i'm sure sameAs and differentIndividual (or however it is
called) claims could probably make
(rejigged subject line)
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:35 AM, Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote:
Pat, I wish you had been there. ;)
I have very mixed views on this, I have to say. Part of me wanted badly to
be present. But after reading the results of the straw poll, part of me
wants to completely
Hi Patrick,
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Patrick Durusau patr...@durusau.net wrote:
Dan,
Just a quick response to only one of the interesting points you raise:
It's clear that many workshop participants were aware of the risk of
destabilizing the core technologies just as we are gaining
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Jeremy Carroll jer...@topquadrant.com wrote:
I am still not hearing any argument to justify the costs of literals as
subjects
I have loads and loads of code, both open source and commercial that assumes
throughout that a node in a subject position is not a
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Sandro Hawke san...@w3.org wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 17:10 +0100, Nathan wrote:
In all honesty, if this doesn't happen, I personally will have no choice
but to move to N3 for the bulk of things, and hope for other
serializations of N3 to come along.
RIF
(cc: list trimmed to LOD list.)
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Cut long story short.
[-cut-]
We have an EAV graph model, URIs, triples and a variety of data
representation mechanisms. N3 is one of those, and its basically the
foundation that
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
The sequence went something like this.
TimBL Design Issues Note. and SPARQL emergence. Before that, RDF was
simply
in the dark ages.
It's only simple if you weren't there :)
You mean you didn't see me lurking
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Hammond, Tony t.hamm...@nature.com wrote:
Hi Kingsley:
Kill me with the PDF URL :-(
I think we could have been a tad more gracious here. This kind of remark
only serves to alienate the well intentioned.
You know, it's not actually (yet) a crime to put out a
[snip]
This is the second time in a few hours that a thread has degenerated
into talk of accusations and insults.
I don't care who started it. Sometimes email just isn't the best way
to communicate. If people are feeling this way about an email
discussion, it might be worth the respective
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
