.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2008Jan/0108.html
(In fact, since the grammars are quite different in design, it would be an
interesting challenge to prove this statement.)
Hugh
--
Hugh Glaser, Reader
Dependable Systems Software Engineering
School of Electronics
On 03/04/2008 12:41, Kingsley Idehen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hugh Glaser wrote:
...
Hugh
Hugh,
This is an example of many to come, where LOD needs to pitch the value
of Linked Data to Information Publishers :-) I think they will
ultimately publish and host their own RDF Linked Data
Me too, and possible Afraz and Ian (Millard).
On 04/04/2008 12:01, Kingsley Idehen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Heath wrote:
[note the forward to the new mailing list :)]
Yves, count me in. There's no informal meetup planned yet, so if it
suits you then yes, let's combine the two and
Hmm.
In a linked data world, the location of the institution would be published,
and then another linked world would be used to map place to lat/long?
This could actually happen just within dbpedia.
So looking up the institution in dbpedia will often give the p:city, which
leads to geo:lat and
://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#lat ?long
}
You can try pasting this into http://dbpedia.org/sparql
On 30/05/2008 03:19, David Huynh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hugh Glaser wrote:
Hmm.
In a linked data world, the location of the institution would be published,
and then another linked world
://dbpedia.org/sparql with
SELECT ?lat ?long WHERE {
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Edinburgh
http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#lat ?lat .
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Edinburgh
http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#long ?long
}
Best
Hugh
--
Hugh Glaser, Reader
Dependable
Good stuff - Got me distracted from my marking!
I have added some structure (I found someone had added imdb while I was
adding it myself :-) ).
We need to distinguish between the real supplier providing the data, and
someone else (such as me) providing a linked data version of it.
So, as an
Just how good are the Search services - are they as good as they claim?
I've been worrying about this for quite a while now, running round the
engines I know about, submitting URIs, etc.. I usually get assured that
things will be really good soon, but I'm not sure how much things are
improving.
Hi Giovanni,
Thanks. Yes, we have been worrying about this for a while, and been trying
to tease apart some of the requirements.
On 05/07/2008 19:10, Giovanni Tummarello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Bernard, there were talks on LOD some time ago (now migrating the
dicussion there) from Hugh
By context we mean quite a lot more (I would call your context something like
provenance, which is a part of the whole context).
So we might like to say when the statements were believed to be true; what was
the policy we applied to build the knowledge (did we allow false positives to
avoid
take architectural steps to reduce it,
introducing canons and things like that, but the fundamental big O problem
is still there.
Best
Hugh
--
Hugh Glaser, Reader
Dependable Systems Software Engineering
School of Electronics and Computer Science
?
Numbers such as 1,4,5,6 will be much easier to see and compare on a diagram
than 10, 1, 234712, 2437145.
On 06/08/2008 11:34, Yves Raimond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Hugh Glaser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 06/08/2008 09:54, Yves Raimond [EMAIL PROTECTED
If you have people who want to see some code.
Last year I put a little hack on this list.
Like quite a few of us, we resolve URIs by trapping a 404 and then doing
an SCBD or whatever on a triplestore, and returning the RDF.
Caching is good, however.
So when we resolve a URI, we also put it in the
Very nicely put, Richard.
We are opening up the discussion here of when to define one's own and when to
(re-)use from elsewhere.
I am a bit uncomfortable with the idea of you should use a:b from c and d:e
from f and g:h from i...
It makes for a fragmented view of my data, and might encourage me
All praise to the work, but..
Although the Semantic Web Client library and middleware that uses it are
exciting, and undoubtedly part of the correct way to go, I am worried about
overclaiming; please can we avoid it.
On 24/11/2008 15:09, Juan Sequeda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Now just
out...
A
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Hugh Glaser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As Kingsley said, most sites will provide such things.
If you want a load of SPARQL endpoints to have a go at (but please don't do
too much wrong!),
*.rkbexplorer.com/sparql currently has 35.
Eg
Try putting SELECT
:42 PM, Hugh Glaser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean I can SELECT * WHERE {?s ?p ?o } and get a sensible answer?
That is exciting.
On 25/11/2008 19:25, Aldo Bucchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well,
The good news is that with OpenLink's new offering, you're pretty much
entitled to do all
that my software is poor and I
should be using (buying?) something else.
On 26/11/2008 02:12, Kingsley Idehen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hugh Glaser wrote:
I thought that might be the answer.
So what is the ontology of the error, so that my SW application can deal with
it appropriately
On 27/11/2008 13:43, Georgi Kobilarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John,
Do you think the argument is mostly settled, or would you agree that
duplicating a massive set of URIs for 'local technical simplification'
is a bad practice? (In which case, is the question just a matter of
scale?)
Thanks Aldo.
Interesting points.
However..
On 27/11/2008 16:47, Aldo Bucchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
A simple metadata on this therad, from my POV.
I am obviously missing some more thorough analysis.
What I intend to show is just how this discussions usually tend to be
too broad and
is still a fairly
complex business. As long as these problems are not solved, we pretty
much are stuck with SPARQL endpoints.
Best,
Richard
On 27 Nov 2008, at 00:18, Hugh Glaser wrote:
Prompted by the thread on linked data hosted somewhere I would
like to ask
the above question that has been
It may have meant a number of things.
But if you look at thread
Managing Co-reference (Was: A Semantic Elephant?)
which you can find in the middle of
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2008May/thread.html
you should get a sense of some of what might have been meant.
A chunk of
Thanks Yves.
Sorry, I haven't had the time to get into the voiD details, but it is certainly
the case that we have a lot of linksets that are independent of the KBs; in
fact, that is our primary linkage mechanism.
So if voiD has a problem with that, then there may be a problem.
(In fact years
Hi.
Good stuff.
And yes, the rkbexplorer world is an exception, as there is an
infrastructure that is based around such external link sets (as you call
them) for doing the linkage. And in fact this sits uneasily in the current
LOD world; so for example rkbexplorer is only one circle in the LOD
Exciting stuff, Kingsley.
I'm not quite sure I have worked out how I might use it though.
The page says that hosting data is clearly free, but I can't see how to get at
it without paying for it as an EC2 customer.
Is this right?
Cheers
Hugh
On 01/12/2008 15:30, Kingsley Idehen [EMAIL
you give me a clue how to get at the data without using my credit card
please? :-)
Best
Hugh
On 05/12/2008 02:28, Kingsley Idehen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hugh Glaser wrote:
Exciting stuff, Kingsley.
I'm not quite sure I have worked out how I might use it though.
The page says that hosting
, who is firing up the
Virtuoso magic to deliver the RDF for the resolved URI?
Best
Hugh
On 07/12/2008 03:34, Kingsley Idehen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hugh Glaser wrote:
Thanks Kingsley.
In case I am still misunderstanding, a quick question:
On 06/12/2008 23:53, Kingsley Idehen [EMAIL PROTECTED
That looks great.
And if you wanted to do more linkage, we have put the UN/LOCODE data [1] at
http://unlocode.rkbexplorer.com/
(RDF:
http://unlocode.rkbexplorer.com/models/unlocode-towns.rdf
http://unlocode.rkbexplorer.com/models/unlocode-countries.rdf
Hi Kingsley,
On 18/12/2008 16:53, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
All,
We are now ready to load the entire LOD cloud into a Virtuoso 6.0
(Cluster Edition) instance that will be available to the public (in
identical manner to what we currently offer re. DBpedia).
Cool.
I
On 21/12/2008 17:49, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Hugh,
Hi,
Of course the VoiD descriptions will do, but right now how many exist?
Great.
34 at the moment.
A note re. VoiD should be added to ESW Wiki esp. in relation to RDF data
set discovery.
Already there :-)
Hugh
Another interesting version of the diagram.
Good work.
However, it is a bit disappointing to see that the many sites at the
rkbexplorer activity are treated as one node.
(Cathy Dolbear of the OS raised the strangeness of this quite a while ago on
this list, in relation to connection from the
Thanks Tom,
Appended, with values as of today.
Or we can provide a separate picture (as well)?
I should mention that we had a chat with Richard about this when we were in
Galway, and agreed that the maintenance of the original one was a problem,
and maybe we would propose to add just some of the
On 19/01/2009 21:51, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 1/19/09 4:31 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
Don't know if it helps, but the equivalent of the LOD diagram is at
http://www.rkbexplorer.com/linkage/crs-linkage-neat.png
http://www.rkbexplorer.com/linkage/crs-linkage-neat.svg
On 27/01/2009 16:31, Jun Zhao jun.z...@zoo.ox.ac.uk wrote:
...
that there are things that cannot be done without LD. And I would really
want to know what the LD community feels about how far the LD technology
is reaching outside the SW community.
I would be interested to know how far LD
I was of course excited by the appearance of the news article about
OpenCalais in the esw wiki.
So like many of us, I hope, I trundled over there to see if I could do some
linkage to it from my LD.
Having failed, I guess my question is, how do I find the URIs in Calais so I
can link to them?
A
(Note to self: Ooh - a lot of interesting stuff here - must try very hard to be
brief.)
I think this is actually part of the I can't host your Linked Data for you
issue.
Once a resolvable URI has broken, for any reason, it is dead.
The same knowledge might be out there, but the link is dead,
Many thanks for all the stimulating response to brighten up this dreary
Saturday and help me to avoid the things I really have to do.
A digest of some of my further responses (so it is easy to ignore me all at
once if you want!):
On 07/02/2009 15:02, Andraz Tori and...@zemanta.com wrote:
Hi
On 07/02/2009 19:57, Yves Raimond yves.raim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
Sorry, I just cannot accept that a SPARQL endpoint is th esort of thing that
we should be expecting new casual users to try to use, even with a query
builder.
You made the point about linkage systems - I was answering
OK.
Let me be a bit optimistic here :-)
And plug my technology :-)
Despite my frustrations, I did manage to do some linking.
I had a quick go at the languages, and the fruits of those labours can be
found in the CRS of the courseware.rkbexplorer.com KB.
This means that for example users of
Given your encouragement, I have dared to create such a page:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/LinkingOpenData/BrokenLinksInLOD
There is a link from the main page.
I have tried to add a bit of structure as well, and I even remembered to
subscribe to it :-)
Best
Hugh
As some of you have worked out by now, I am getting frustrated trying to
provide links from my stuff to the other stuff.
When I do find the links, they may be of dubious quality, but worse still, I
am having difficulty finding them at all.
So I started at dbpedia, and followed outgoing arrows.
On 16/02/2009 00:45, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
As for MusicBrainz and DBpedia, that's kinda in flux as the first cut is
relatively scant, old, and based on Zitgist URIs. We have a new cut as
per my mail about MusicBrainz and EC2, and it is based on MusicBrainz
URIs. We
On 17/02/2009 22:57, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
You can do this when lod.openlinksw.com/sparql comes online in the next
24 hrs. Remember, this is the LOD instance comprised of:
Part 1:
1. DBpedia (with Yago, UMBEL, and OpenCyc inference rules)
2. MusicBrainz
3.
Maybe:
Mint a new URI in a (new?) opencyc class that is what you think the
wordnet:NounSynset is (or use the same class, which would be better).
Then establish the exact property you want between
http://sw.opencyc.org/2008/06/10/concept/en/India
And your new URI.
And assert owl:sameAs between
Nice going Ted.
Sanity checking (and even QA) is always good.
(I'll try and find the time to respond accurately to the RKB queries soon.)
Just one general comment I'd like to make - size isn't everything!
Millions of links between dbpedia and yago or freebase might give us a nice
warm feeling,
Hi Bernard.
Great stuff.
I'm trying to get together all these sameAs links, and put them in one
service.
I had done the lingvoj ones I needed, but I hope you don't mind, but I have
now asserted all your sameAs from lingvoj.rdf into it.
For example:
Hi,
OK Kjetil, I clearly need to respond to your injunction to respond to Daniel.
Perhaps I avoided answering because it would feel a bit negative - not sure.
I am rather uncomfortable with even the idea that users might browse the
semantic web.
I know that is not what you are suggesting, Daniel,
/rdf+xml
http://www.rkbexplorer.com/sameAs/?uri=http://bio2rdf.org/dbpedia:3-Methylf
entanyl
To get the rdf sameAs list.
Hope that might help a little.
Best
Hugh
--
Hugh Glaser, Reader
Dependable Systems Software Engineering
School of Electronics and Computer Science
Hi Juan,
Nice stuff.
I hate to pick up on something from interesting stuff like this, but:
which executes queries over the whole Web of linked data and, hence, enables
applications to access the whole Web as if it is a single database.
I don't think so.
It doesn't do the whole Web of linked data,
Services:
You might want to look at our
http://www.rkbexplorer.com/demos/
for such services.
It is our internal page, but you should be able to work out what to do.
The Network and Detail services might interest you:
http://www.rkbexplorer.com/network/?uri=http://dblp.rkbexplorer.com/id/peopl
On 12/05/2009 11:59, Toby Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 11:37 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
I was thinking more of this issue:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2009May/0071.html
re. slide 26. I've seen this done too, and it's quite concerning.
owl:sameAs
the LOD data, which it is not.
Also, I am not sure it is right to call it a linked data browser; I can't
work out how to use it to browse any other sites than the Virtuoso EC2 one.
Best
Hugh
PS Sorry to those who feel I have been here before, but I think there are
important things here.
--
Hugh
...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Hugh Glaser wrote:
Dear Sherman,
It's great to have more activity, and all strength to you.
However, I would like to ask if you could modify some of your description to
more accurately reflect what it is doing.
Referring to the dataset as the public LOD cloud instance of Virtuoso
://lod.openlinksw.com/ as a linked data browser!
Best
Hugh
On 16/05/2009 01:06, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Hugh Glaser wrote:
I have difficulty in interpreting what you say - we are looking at the same
linked data browser page?:
http://ec2.monrai.com:8890/facets/
All I can see
Hi.
On 16/05/2009 00:51, Sherman Monroe sdmon...@gmail.com wrote:
I don¹t think I can give your browser any URI I choose that resolves using
http to a typical LD document?
If not, it is not a linked data browser.
Under this strict definition (which I am now inclined to accept, in that
On 18/05/2009 17:50, Sherman Monroe sdmon...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Type the
URL in the WWW browser, you get the thing being shared. Type the URI in the SW
browser, you get the things people say about the thing.
I would not agree.
Type the URL into the WWW browser, and you get what the browser
Hi David,
Excellent stuff.
It is important, as you do, to make statements about what is good
citizenship, and to distinguish these from what might be enforced etc..
I was about to suggest that you might want a ³URI is deprecated² in your
figure, but then I found that was the title of the Event 4
We use dbpedia as part of the linked data world when computing networks and
service details of things that we know have dbpedia entries; we also use the
sameAs information.
Eg
For example see the ³Description² bit of
http://www.rkbexplorer.com/detail/?uri=http://southampton.rkbexplorer.com/id
Nice work.
However :-)
It should be
@prefix : http://ontologi.es/rail/stations/gb/ .
not
@prefix : http://ontologi.es/rail/station/gb/ .
Cheers
Hugh
On 20/05/2009 16:15, Toby Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 14:57 +0100, Yves Raimond wrote:
3) An interface for submitting
I think sitemap may already have what you want.
We use slicing=subject-object
For our sets such as:
(See http://acm.rkbexplorer.com/sitemap.xml).
http://sw.deri.org/2007/07/sitemapextension/
Says:
The sc:linkedDataPrefix and sc:sparqlEndpointLocation tags can have an
optional slicing attribute
Sorry, I'll try harder :-)
I understand that what you are asking is something like this.
For some sites (including rkbexplorer), when you resolve a URI, it constructs a
SPARQL query and returns the result of the query.
This might be all the triples with the subject, or object, or both, or
Hi David,
On 20/05/2009 06:01, David Booth da...@dbooth.org wrote:
A last comment, which I know we have discussed, and you possibly disagree:
Community expropriation of a URI
Might have meant something else.
One of the problems is that many authors will not discharge their Statement
Author
On 21/05/2009 00:02, Daniel Schwabe dschw...@inf.puc-rio.br wrote:
On 20/05/2009 17:14, Hugh Glaser wrote:
Sorry, I'll try harder :-)
I understand that what you are asking is something like this.
For some sites (including rkbexplorer), when you resolve a URI, it constructs
a SPARQL query
An interesting question - should be a classic for Linked Data.
As I understand it, your primary problem for New Zealand is that there is no
reliable information about the administrative geography.
It doesn't help for New Zealand (!), but for the UK you could use the Ordnance
Survey's, which can
On 25/05/2009 00:40, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Hugh Glaser wrote:
An interesting question - should be a classic for Linked Data.
As I understand it, your primary problem for New Zealand is that
there is no reliable information about
Thanks Kingsley.
I'm not sure why you have raised all this again.
I simply suggested to Richard another way of doing what he wanted.
You then asked me whether what you had proposed failed to resolve his
problem.
I can't say whether it does, but perhaps Richard can better answer that.
But it would
of things.
Best
Hugh
On 25/05/2009 13:02, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Hugh Glaser wrote:
Thanks Kingsley.
I'm not sure why you have raised all this again.
I simply suggested to Richard another way of doing what he wanted.
I don't have an issue with you point Richard
.
In addition, by providing formats oriented towards non-Linked Data
application, we hope that the use of Linked Data can be spread even wider.
We currently have about 18M URIs, with an average of 3 URIs per bundle.
Best
Ian Millard and Hugh Glaser
--
Hugh Glaser, Reader
Dependable
to the other responders as well.
On 03/06/2009 22:40, Toby A Inkster m...@tobyinkster.co.uk wrote:
On 3 Jun 2009, at 20:48, Hugh Glaser wrote:
The following formats are also supported:
rdf+xml, text/n3, application/json, text/plain
Starting on the HTML search result page and clicking though to the
rdf
-examples-part-2 [2] on using
razorbase to do co-reference lookups.
Thanks.
Thanks,
Pleasure
Hugh
-sherman
[1] http://lod.openlinksw.com
[2] http://www.slideshare.net/sdmonroe/razorbase-examples-part-2
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
We
Hi John,
Yes, I had noticed the Southampton problem - possibly like you because of
where we live :-)
We have plans, but not sure if there is time to execute them.
As you rightly worked out, the process is that someone identifies a
(possible) problem, and so the source needs to be informed of the
On 04/06/2009 09:20, Dan Brickley dan...@danbri.org wrote:
On 4/6/09 01:54, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
Hugh, Ian,
Great work -- simple, visually attractive, does what it says on the tin.
A pleasure to use.
Yup! :)
I think it would be pretty cool to make it
#this owl:sameAs U1, U2, U3,
On 04/06/2009 09:26, Chris Wallace chris.wall...@uwe.ac.uk wrote:
Hugh
This is excellent stuff and I totally support your views about composable Sem
Web tools:
Brian Kernighan et al. must be proud of us.
Just a couple of observations:
- the AJAX interface is neat but its no good for
finished
- I do get enthusiastic, and the workers have to pay :-)
Again, thanks for this service.
Pleasure - prefix.cc provided some inspiration.
And many thanks for the thoughtful comments.
Hugh
Richard
On 3 Jun 2009, at 20:48, Hugh Glaser wrote:
We are pleased to offer http
On 05/06/2009 04:09, Giovanni Tummarello g.tummare...@gmail.com wrote:
a New Zealander and a Kiwifruit)
throws up a radio station, an animated cartoon and lots of wordnet links to
a
juggle of plumbing but no juice. No sign of
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Kiwi however
Ah.
We only
something like that, so is there a URI
to describe that please?
Best
Hugh
Thanks Peter.
On 05/06/2009 10:37, Peter Ferne pe...@jivatechnology.com wrote:
On 4 Jun 2009, at 23:47, Hugh Glaser wrote:
Added some words in the about - any advice as to what the licence
might be?
I guess
On 08/06/2009 20:59, Toby A Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk wrote:
On 8 Jun 2009, at 12:22, Bernard Vatant wrote:
http://sameas.org/html?uri=http://www.lingvoj.org/lang/fr provides
16 equivalent URIs (including the original one).
At http://www.lingvoj.org/lang/fr I've gathered painfully only 10
of
Thank you all.
Very helpful.
On 08/06/2009 12:45, Tim Berners-Lee ti...@w3.org wrote:
Agreed. Go for CC0.
Disclaimers are an orthogonal issue I *hope*.
On 2009-06 -08, at 00:13, Marc Wick wrote:
Added some words in the about - any advice as to what the licence
might be?
I guess
.
Thanks for the suggestions.
Hugh
Richard
On 3 Jun 2009, at 20:48, Hugh Glaser wrote:
We are pleased to offer http://sameas.org/ as a service to provide
you with
help finding URIs.
It sort of does what it says:- if you provide a URI, it will give
you back
URIs that may well be co
Hi,
To put it in simple terms for me :-)
Are you after the algorithms we use to identify when two instances are the same?
Best
Hugh
On 11/06/2009 12:57, François Scharffe francois.schar...@inria.fr wrote:
Dear LODers,
There has been a couple of discussions already on this list on the need
for a
Many thanks.
I hadn't got round to it :-)
Added it to our swse and sindice auto-submits.
So now it is grinding through the 4017 rdf files from the 49 rkb sitemaps.
Very helpful indeed.
On 14/06/2009 15:54, Martin Hepp (UniBW) martin.h...@ebusiness-unibw.org
wrote:
Dear all:
I am sure you all
On 15/06/2009 00:18, Toby A Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk wrote:
On 14 Jun 2009, at 10:23, Danny Ayers wrote:
It's Ian Davis' birthday tomorrow, and for it he wants some linked
data.
Happy Birthday Ian!
ISO 3166-1 and -2 codes, e.g.: Warwickshire
http://ontologi.es/place/GB-WAR
On 15/06/2009 10:14, Toby Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 01:03 +0100, Hugh Glaser wrote:
On 15/06/2009 00:18, Toby A Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk wrote:
I still need to add some 303 redirects in there.
Better hurry up, people might find it...
http://sameas.org/html?uri
Thanks mate - nice.
I had a go at your ttl, and it seemed that http://purl.org/NET/book/vocab#isbn
was not actually the right prefix for i:.
I messed about and got to a pure prefix of http://purl.org/NET/book/isbn/
So I went and used
http://purl.org/NET/book/isbn/0001841572
(ie no #book) which
OK, I'll have a go :-)
Why did I think this would be fun to do on a sunny Sunday morning that has
turned into afternoon?
Here are the instructions:
1. Create a web-accessible directory, let's say foobar, with all your .rdf,
.ttl, .ntriples and .html files in it.
2. Copy lodpub.php and
Thanks Azamat.
On 07/07/2009 00:01, Azamat abd...@cytanet.com.cy wrote:
HG: We have revamped a lot of the RKB and RKBExplorer infrastructure since
last
exposing it here, so you may well like to give it another visit at
http://www.rkbexplorer.com/
Visited and found some ontology tendered
Sorry to hear that, Pat.
On 08/07/2009 14:51, Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote:
On Jul 5, 2009, at 10:16 AM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
OK, I'll have a go :-)
Why did I think this would be fun to do on a sunny Sunday morning
that has turned into afternoon?
Here are the instructions
On 09/07/2009 00:38, Toby A Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk wrote:
On 8 Jul 2009, at 19:58, Seth Russell wrote:
Is it not true that everything past the hash (#alice) is not
transmitted back to the server when a browser clicks on a
hyperlink ? If that is true, then the server would not be able to
On 09/07/2009 07:56, Peter Ansell ansell.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/9 Juan Sequeda juanfeder...@gmail.com:
On Jul 9, 2009, at 2:25 AM, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
snip hash URI comments
Mind you, it does mean that you should make sure that you don't put too
many
LD URIs in one
I am finding the current discussion really difficult.
Those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat it.
As an example:
In the 1980s there were a load of hypertext systems that required the users
to do a bunch of stuff to buy into them. They had great theoretical bases,
and their
Hi.
Looks exciting.
But I think there are a few problems still.
Wordnet.owl has some mismatched tags (owl:SymmetricProperty
owl:ObjectProperty).
And probably rdf:about and rdf:resource in both need sorting so that the files
can be moved around without the URI changing.
rapper picks up stuff
Excellent Alan, thank you for pointing this out, both as a general point and
the specific case.
I had puzzled over the equivalences, since they seemed implausible (just given
the number), but not worked out why (I guess the lack of the backlink did not
help).
However they, along with good
On 24/07/2009 16:28, Alan Ruttenberg alanruttenb...@gmail.com wrote:
As a constructive suggestion, an incremental improvement to sameAs.org
would be to systematically eradicate any references to dbpedia entries
that are disambiguation pages on wikipedia.
-Alan
Thanks Alan.
I'm not quite
On 27/07/2009 11:50, Ivan Herman i...@w3.org wrote:
Eric,
although not directly relevant to your question (ie, sorry to chime in
on another subject) but you might want to consider using the bibo
ontology for the books:
http://bibliontology.com/
this ontology is certainly getting
and follow the redirect don't I still get the non-wikipedia data with the
wikipedia data?
Or am I not understanding something?
Best
Hugh
On 28/07/2009 11:17, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Hugh Glaser wrote:
For the record ( © Alan!).
I consider it bad practice to keep the knowledge
Hugh, Mark and Ian.
--
Hugh Glaser, Reader
Dependable Systems Software Engineering
School of Electronics and Computer Science,
University of Southampton,
Southampton SO17 1BJ
Work: +44 (0)23 8059 3670, Fax: +44 (0)23 8059 3045
Mobile: +44 (0
On 28/07/2009 14:56, Alan Ruttenberg alanruttenb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Hugh Glaserh...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
For the record ( © Alan!).
I consider it bad practice to keep the knowledge about linking in the same KB
as the substantive knowledge you are
On 29/07/2009 12:35, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Hugh Glaser wrote:
On 28/07/2009 14:46, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Hugh Glaser wrote:
Good stuff.
However, I don't think that Named Graphs are the answer.
I get my Linked Data by resolving
Please no! Not another manual entry system.
I had already decided I just haven't got the time to manually maintain this
constantly changing set of numbers, so would not be responding to the request
to update.
(In fact, the number of different places that a good LD citizen has to put
their data
On 11/08/2009 15:47, Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote:
On Aug 11, 2009, at 5:45 AM, Chris Bizer wrote:
Hi Kingsley, Pat and all,
snip/
Everything on the Web is a claim by somebody. There are no facts,
there is
no truth, there are only opinions.
Same is true of the Web and of
1 - 100 of 458 matches
Mail list logo
