with
http://www.w3.org/ns/adms#representationTechnique
Bearing in mind it's more or a hint that a bot can stiff when it gets
confused, rather than, a hard and fast rule ...
HTH
Phil.
On 03/01/2013 11:55, Tim Haynes wrote:
On 01/02/2013 10:59 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
Was wondering
On 18 January 2013 11:23, Dan Brickley dan...@danbri.org wrote:
With RDFa maturing (RDFa 1.1, particularly Lite), I wanted to ask here
about attitudes to RDFa.
I have acquired the impression somehow that in the Linked Data scene,
people lean more towards the classic 'a doc for the humans,
On 15 February 2013 15:51, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 2/15/13 8:42 AM, Sarven Capadisli wrote:
Ahoy hoy,
OECD Linked Data:
http://oecd.270a.info/
BFS Linked Data:
http://bfs.270a.info/
FAO Linked Data:
http://fao.270a.info/
Linked SDMX Data:
On 14 February 2013 17:46, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
It's my first time here, but I've been attracted to the Linked data
initiative for quite a while now. A couple of weeks ago I needed to build
my first RDF vocabulary.. I cannot tell you how hard this process was for
On 20 March 2013 12:36, Sarven Capadisli i...@csarven.ca wrote:
Dear community,
I would like to know which venues (e.g., conferences, journals) are out
there that accepts research documents in (X)HTML+CSS+JavaScript+MathML+**SVG
etc. as the primary and final format. On that note, which
http://betsofbitco.in/
On 1 April 2013 01:13, Christopher Gutteridge c...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
Apparently http://uri4uri.net/ launched today and claims to solves many
of the problems of Linked data. It looks promising..
Thanks for the pointer!
The single most important development in the history of the Semantic
On 1 May 2013 13:14, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 5/1/13 6:09 AM, Luca Matteis wrote:
Dear Hugh,
o linkeddata.org could feed off a subset of semanticweb.org, by
re-skinning
o linkeddata.org might simply lead to semanticweb.org
I like the strict separation between
On 6 May 2013 13:33, Sarven Capadisli i...@csarven.ca wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to invite you to sign the petition International Semantic Web
Conference: ISWC calls to allow scientific research submission in Web
friendly formats [1].
For the sake of building towards what we care about,
On 18 May 2013 04:15, Pascal Hitzler pascal.hitz...@wright.edu wrote:
We just finished a piece indicating serious legal issues regarding the
commercialization of Linked Data - this may be of general interest, hence
the post. We hope to stimulate discussions on this issue (hence the
On 7 June 2013 18:52, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
There have been a few recent threads on the LOD and Semantic
Web mailing lists that boil down to the fundamental issues of
profitability, business models, and Linked Data.
Situation Analysis
==
Business
On 11 June 2013 19:59, David Booth da...@dbooth.org wrote:
On 06/11/2013 12:18 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 6/11/13 11:56 AM, David Booth wrote:
On 06/11/2013 10:59 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
[ . . . ] many RDF advocates
want to conflate Linked Data and RDF. This is technically wrong,
On 11 June 2013 21:40, Robert Sanderson azarot...@gmail.com wrote:
We have successfully used two different tools in this realm:
1. JSON-LD. This doesn't quite fit your definition, but JSON-LD is an
easy to produce and consume RDF serialization. http://www.json-ld.org/
2. RdfQuery. A
On 11 June 2013 22:51, David Booth da...@dbooth.org wrote:
On 06/11/2013 04:20 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 6/11/13 4:12 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
This is the goal of the Semantic Web: to enable machines to
usefully and (semi-)automatically, find, share, combine and
process
On 11 June 2013 23:59, Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote:
On Jun 11, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 6/11/13 11:56 AM, David Booth wrote:
On 06/11/2013 10:59 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
[ . . . ] many RDF advocates
want to conflate Linked Data and RDF. This is technically
On 13 June 2013 19:19, David Booth da...@dbooth.org wrote:
[Sidebar: A term of art is A word or phrase that has special
meaning in a particular context. (The Free Dictionary)]
A heated debate has been raging about the accepted meaning
of the term Linked Data in the context of the Semantic
On 13 June 2013 21:04, Norman Gray nor...@astro.gla.ac.uk wrote:
Greetings.
On 2013 Jun 13, at 19:36, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
[reordered]
So RDF may spring to mind when you say Linked Data, given it's so
prevalent, but Linked Data refers to a set of things, RDF is just one of
On 13 June 2013 21:34, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
Again, not sure what the big deal is. It's like asking: Does the term
Web imply the use of CSS?
Sure it does. It's an important part of the Web as it allows people to
style their documents.
So is RDF to Linked Data, as it allows
On 13 June 2013 21:38, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 6/13/13 3:34 PM, Luca Matteis wrote:
Again, not sure what the big deal is. It's like asking: Does the term
Web imply the use of CSS?
It doesn't.
HTML, maybe-ish.
Sure it does. It's an important part of the Web as
On 17 June 2013 12:02, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
Plus, if you don't have RDF strictly within the definition of Linked Data,
what else do you have? Just any generic data that is linked? Isn't that the
Web (not Linked Data)?
It depends whether or not you consider the web a data
On 17 June 2013 12:32, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Melvin Carvalho
melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote:
It depends whether or not you consider the web a data space.
Wasn't the whole point of Linked Data to create a Web of Data rather
than a Web
On 17 June 2013 14:34, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
Come on! If you're building something that works like the Web but isn't
using HTTP, then it's *not* the Web. It's something else that has similar
dynamics to the Web (like, I dunno, a gazillion of other things?).
SPDY?
On
On 17 June 2013 14:49, Barry Norton barry.nor...@ontotext.com wrote:
Agreed. It always amuses me to hear how Web/REST is not coupled to HTTP.
Applying for a Web job without HTML/HTTP skills is like applying for a
Linked Data job without RDF/HTTP.
The rest might be interesting to some, but
On 17 June 2013 15:32, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Barry Norton
barry.nor...@ontotext.comwrote:
LINKED DATA IS PEOPLE.
LINKED DATA IS YOUR MOM
-1 Was that really necessary?
ps: kindly don't ban me :)
On 17 June 2013 23:26, David Wood da...@3roundstones.com wrote:
Nicely done, Kingsley! That is an excellent exploration of the boundaries.
Yes, it is RDF (of course), but crappy RDF since the predicates are hardly
likely to be reused by others or even mapped via owl:sameAs.
Yes, it is
is black.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Melvin Carvalho
melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 June 2013 23:26, David Wood da...@3roundstones.com wrote:
Nicely done, Kingsley! That is an excellent exploration of the
boundaries.
Yes, it is RDF (of course), but crappy RDF since
On 18 June 2013 06:44, David Booth da...@dbooth.org wrote:
On 06/17/2013 08:11 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
On 06/17/2013 06:21 PM, Luca Matteis wrote:
This still doesn't answer my initial question How do you produce
Linked Data without RDF?.
Here's the first way (plain 'ol JSON object):
{
On 18 June 2013 13:43, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 6/18/13 1:01 AM, David Booth wrote:
On 06/18/2013 12:05 AM, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program wrote:
The debate about whether linked data requires RDF is actually a typical
example of a wrong formulation in the applicable
On 18 June 2013 15:24, David Booth da...@dbooth.org wrote:
On 06/18/2013 08:29 AM, Luca Matteis wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com
mailto:kide...@openlinksw.com** wrote:
Luckily, I believe only a minority of folks hold the distorted views
On 19 June 2013 14:09, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
Firstly, having now read the threads, I thank you all for a lot of very
interesting and thoughtful words.
Also, as best I can describe what I think, it seems that David Booth has
eloquently said much of what I would say.
I'm not
On 19 June 2013 14:44, Bernard Vatant bernard.vat...@mondeca.com wrote:
I guess I'm not the only one : I'm about to put a filter rule on my inbox
from public-lod AND (contains RDF and Linked Data) = trash
No one having a decent full-time job and normal life can have the
bandwidth (not even
On 20 June 2013 15:37, Courtney, Paul K. paul_court...@dfci.harvard.eduwrote:
To be honest, this entire thread has reminded me of the lengthy threads
on the ontolog listserv that finally caused me to unsubscribe. I could not
characterize those threads as discussions because so many of the
to
them.
Kingsley
Sincerely
Stephane Fellah
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Melvin Carvalho
melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote:
• Restate/reflect ideas that in other posts that are troubling/puzzling
On 21 June 2013 17:32, Stephane Fellah fella...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with you David. Unfortunately the title of rating system (Linked
Open Data) is often misinterpreted.
The first 3 stars are really describing Open Data. The last two are really
Linked Data. A better title could be: From
On 22 June 2013 01:03, Nathan Rixham nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Linked Data is a moving target, it's not Linked Data 1.0, 1.1, 2.0 etc,
it's a set of technologies which make it easy to have machine readable data
that is interlinked on the web.
If Linked Data is built on HTTP currently, then the
It took me quite a while to understand this fully. IMHO, it is really
worth digesting. I think it also sheds light on how to approach some of
the topics raised in the last week.
[[
*The Test of Independent Invention*
There's a test I use for technology which the Consortium is thinking of
On 22 June 2013 18:56, Dominic Oldman do...@oldman.me.uk wrote:
So publishing linked data is easy but creating applications that make use
of it is a completely different kettle of fish and very difficult,
particularly in the way I described.
My assumption is that the linked data community is
that apps like this need to be user
friendly and well documented. To an extent we rely on volunteer
contributions, so any feedback or help is appreciated! :)
Best
Hugh
On 22 Jun 2013, at 18:08, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 22 June 2013 18:56, Dominic Oldman do
On 23 June 2013 15:39, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 June 2013 20:01, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
Hi Melvin,
I wouldn't really say that Tabulator was suitable for general non
technical users.
Fair, comment, but that's something we'd like to change
On 23 June 2013 23:58, Barry Norton barry.nor...@ontotext.com wrote:
On 23/06/13 22:46, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Please, I told you before, and I will tell you again don't try to teach
parents how to make babies!
Kingsley, your conduct on this list is beyond a joke.
I would ask you to
On 24 June 2013 01:09, Dan Brickley dan...@danbri.org wrote:
On 23 June 2013 23:46, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 6/23/13 5:36 PM, Barry Norton wrote:
Are you confusing Linked Data and Linked Open Data?
Of course not!
Web-like structured data enhanced with explicit
is inevitable. One thing that I think we can
all agree on, is that interoperablity is a good thing.
David
On 06/22/2013 08:55 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
It took me quite a while to understand this fully. IMHO, it is really
worth digesting. I think it also sheds light on how to approach some
On 24 June 2013 21:56, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
All,
I've taken the time to embellish TimBL's original WWW proposal
illustration with Linked Data URIs [1].
Why?
Because, it seems to be unclear (to many) if the original WWW design had
Linked Data in mind all along.
On 24 June 2013 15:45, Bonnie MacKellar macke...@stjohns.edu wrote:
Hi,
** **
I am one of the female lurkers. I am working on a project that is
attempting to pull together some of the health/medical datasets. I may have
posted once or twice when looking for some information.
On 25 June 2013 06:19, David Booth da...@dbooth.org wrote:
On 06/22/2013 04:47 AM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
What it means now, or at any point in time, must be inclusive to new
in-development or in-use things, other wise it will never mean anything
else later down the line.
If you want it to
, at 18:08, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 22 June 2013 18:56, Dominic Oldman do...@oldman.me.uk wrote:
So publishing linked data is easy but creating applications that make
use of it is a completely different kettle of fish and very difficult,
particularly
On 27 June 2013 17:08, Bernadette Hyland bhyl...@3roundstones.com wrote:
Hi,
On behalf of the editors, I'm pleased to announce the publication of the
peer-reviewed *Linked Data Glossary* published as a W3C Working Group
Note effective 27-June-2013.[1]
We hope this document serves as a
and x2 such that both pairs
(x1,y) and (x2,y) are instances of P.
Although as someone has pointed out, this might be a little too OWL specific
Cheers,
Bernadette
On Jun 27, 2013, at 2:31 PM, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 27 June 2013 17:08, Bernadette Hyland bhyl
On 12 July 2013 17:03, Larry Masinter masin...@adobe.com wrote:
Re Angels and Pins:
http://masinter.blogspot.com/2010/03/resources-are-angels-urls-are-pins.html
Larry, thanks for sharing, I enjoyed reading that. Re:
[[
is http://larry.masinter.net; an identifier for me or for my web
Some people on this list are involved with lod2 [1], a european initiative
to promote open source and linked data. I was wondering if anyone knew if
there were any other world wide projects of a similar nature, with a focus
on creating open source software.
[1]
Does anyone know if there is any ontology for adverts?
I'd like to take a product or service or project, then put up a banner link
or a text ad on my site based on machine readable data
Is DOAP the best bet?
On 30 July 2013 15:21, Laurens Rietveld laurens.rietv...@vu.nl wrote:
Something related to YASGUI: I'm interested in how we as a community
access endpoints, and what tasks we try to perform.
I would strongly appreciate it if you could spare 5 minutes filling in this
questionnaire
On 6 August 2013 13:37, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
Well, RWW.IO looked exciting, so I decided to start with it.
It *is* exciting! :)
And it seemed a good idea to have an account, so I decided I would finally
create a WebID login - I know that lots of people think that this is
On 6 August 2013 13:37, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
Well, RWW.IO looked exciting, so I decided to start with it.
And it seemed a good idea to have an account, so I decided I would finally
create a WebID login - I know that lots of people think that this is the
Way Ahead.
I have a
On 6 August 2013 17:54, Norman Gray nor...@astro.gla.ac.uk wrote:
Hugh and Kingsley, hello.
On 2013 Aug 6, at 14:27, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
In reality though, for your particular user profile I would encourage
you to simply manually add insert the relations required by the WebID+TLS
On 9 August 2013 15:51, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
This is great!
Thanks guys.
I normally really, really don't care about all that crypto stuff (it
should all happen transparently), but I'm find all this interesting!
So yes, I created a p12 (using
On 9 August 2013 16:45, Norman Gray nor...@astro.gla.ac.uk wrote:
Henry, hello.
I don't have much more to add here, because I can't fundamentally add much
more than assertion, but I have a couple of brief responses.
On 2013 Aug 9, at 14:41, Henry Story wrote:
I don't have an easy
On 9 August 2013 17:09, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
Thanks Kingsley,
On 9 Aug 2013, at 15:09, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com
wrote:
On 8/9/13 9:51 AM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
So now all (!!!) I really need to do is make my wordpress site look for
the ID thing.
Hmmm.
On 9 August 2013 18:22, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
Hugh comes back to play /
Thanks Kingsley, and Melvin and Henry and Norman.
So, trying to cut it down to the minimum.
(Sorry, I find some/many of the pages about it really hard going.)
If I have a photo on a server,
On 9 August 2013 18:55, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
Thanks.
I've looked at quite a bit of this stuff, but still don't see where the
ACL document gets stored and used.
I am beginning to get the sense that I may have to write some code, other
than the ACL rdf to do this.
Surely
On 9 August 2013 20:32, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
Thanks.
Fair enough indeed.
And thanks for sticking with me through the process.
I know it's a pain when n00bs like me get involved trying to use bleeding
edge code :-)
I look forward to the consumer version.
In fact, I have
On 10 August 2013 10:56, Henry Story henry.st...@bblfish.net wrote:
On 10 Aug 2013, at 00:18, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
When talking about this with Alexandre Bertails he thought that
rel=meta was
not the right relation and that rel=acl would be more correct.
Yes.
On 10 August 2013 14:23, Andrei Sambra andrei.sam...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 10 August 2013 10:56, Henry Story henry.st...@bblfish.net wrote:
On 10 Aug 2013, at 00:18, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com
On 14 August 2013 13:37, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
Great job Andrei!
I love it and looking forward to using it *a lot*.
For making money out of this sort of thing, look at how these guys have
done it: http://www.iriscouch.com/ - it's a CouchDB cloud thingy.
They have a good
On 20 September 2013 01:17, Fabio Barone holon.ea...@gmail.com wrote:
I was thinking about this a bit more. This is quite a smart model, but I
think we can do better!
Why not let RWW.IO issue it's own currency which allows you use extra
bandwidth, storage etc.
Brilliant. How would you
attractive to a wider audience ...
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 20 September 2013 01:17, Fabio Barone holon.ea...@gmail.com wrote:
I was thinking about this a bit more. This is quite a smart model, but
I think we can do better
On 20 September 2013 17:08, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 9/20/13 4:43 AM, Luca Matteis wrote:
I was just wondering how RWW.io could be making some cash with the
service it's offering.
Melvin,
Luca is trying to brainstorm a business model for RWW.io and similar
Quite an innovative use of Open Data:
http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/innovate/developers/minecraft-map-britain.html
On 17 October 2013 15:05, Andrei Sambra andrei.sam...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
For those of you who know me, please skip this paragraph. For the others,
I would first like to introduce myself. My name is Andrei Sambra and for
the past three years I have been involved in different W3C
On 29 January 2014 22:36, Maloney, Christopher (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]
malon...@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov wrote:
Apologies if this topic has come up before (I feel certain that it has)
but I've searched the archives and Googled, and can't find anything (maybe
too many false positives).
What are the
wrote:
On 1/30/14 1:09 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
If not bad, is there any provision for allowing that an HTTPS URI
that only differs in the scheme part from HTTPS URI be identified
as the same resource?
http and https are fundamentally different resources, but you can link
On 11 April 2014 03:45, Pascal Hitzler pascal.hitz...@wright.edu wrote:
An opinion piece re. linked data quality and reusability:
http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/five-
stars-linked-data-vocabulary-use
(Semantic Web journal)
All comments and feedback welcome.
Interesting
On 28 April 2014 17:23, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
The current Linked Data principles rely on specific standards and
protocols such as HTTP, URIs and RDF/SPARQL. Because I think it's
healthy to look at things from a different prospective, I was
wondering whether the same idea of a
On 29 April 2014 19:28, Giovanni Tummarello g.tummare...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
the Sindice team announces today the end of the support of the Sindice.com
service. Effective late March we have put the service in “read only” mode.
Maintenance on our side will continue until August 30th.
Congrats, this is a really cool resource!
Will the latest release be used at?
http://any23.org/
On 16 May 2014 23:31, Lewis John Mcgibbney lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
The Apache Any23 PMC are proud to announce the immediate release of Any23
1.0 which is a major release for the
, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com
wrote:
Congrats, this is a really cool resource!
Will the latest release be used at?
http://any23.org/
On 16 May 2014 23:31, Lewis John Mcgibbney lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
The Apache Any23 PMC are proud to announce
On 16 July 2014 16:41, Sergio Fernández
sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at wrote:
On 16/07/14 16:33, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
Do you know if JSON LD will be supported?
AFAIK 1.0 should already come with JSON-LD support:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ANY23-177
Thanks
On 16 July 2014 17:27, Lewis John Mcgibbney lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Melvin,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Melvin Carvalho
melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the pointer. Sorry if I may have missed something, but I was
referring to the any23.org website, rather
On 18 July 2014 14:05, Mark Fallu m.fa...@griffith.edu.au wrote:
I am attempting to understand how the the CoolURI 303 redirect pattern for
the semantic web (http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/) can be implemented
without negative impact on search engines.
Just a quick question:
Is there any
On 4 September 2014 20:57, Hugh Glaser h...@glasers.org wrote:
Nice.
That enumerates the choices, I think.
In a world where the services are themselves being used as LD URIs
(because everything is a LD URI, of course!) there is the orthogonal
question of whether the URI needs to be
On 19 September 2014 14:21, Hugh Glaser h...@glasers.org wrote:
We are keen to have someone who can do Linked Data technologies, although
it would be hard to make it a requirement, as it would restrict the market
too much.
On 19 December 2014 at 17:57, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com
wrote:
On 12/19/14 10:49 AM, Steffen Lohmann wrote:
Hi all,
we are glad to announce the release of WebVOWL 0.3, which integrates our
OWL2VOWL converter now. WebVOWL works in modern web browsers without any
installation so
On 23 December 2014 at 00:17, Sarven Capadisli i...@csarven.ca wrote:
On 2014-12-22 13:04, Steffen Lohmann wrote:
On 21.12.2014 04:11, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
I would normally expect a ? in the query string however, rather than,
# which I presume is the 1337 way to hide the ontology from
On 3 February 2015 at 10:53, Giovanni Tummarello g.tummare...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
would anyone be able to recommend/point to available system/library to get
opengraph search capabilities like.. like in facebook .. things like
pictures that my friends like
people depicted in pictures
On 15 January 2015 at 12:20, Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche
py.vandenbuss...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have the pleasure to announce the release of a new version of the Linked
Open Vocabularies (LOV) application. A massive re-engineering of the
application has been made, now using the power of
On 4 March 2015 at 11:41, Ghislain Atemezing auguste.atemez...@eurecom.fr
wrote:
Hello Melvin,
Le 4 mars 2015 à 09:54, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com a
écrit :
I was looking to model presence for a chat app using linked data. I
thought about using
http://online-presence.net
On 6 March 2015 at 11:04, Ghislain Atemezing auguste.atemez...@eurecom.fr
wrote:
Melvin,
Le 6 mars 2015 à 10:56, Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com a
écrit :
OPO would be a good match, but is the vocab / project still alive?
If you really want to use OPO, you can visit the page
I was looking to model presence for a chat app using linked data. I
thought about using
http://online-presence.net/
But the site has not been up for about a year. Does anyone have experience
of this use case?
On 23 June 2015 at 16:55, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 6/23/15 9:07 AM, Ali Khalili wrote:
Dear all,
we are happy to announce the beta release of our LD-R (Linked Data
Reactor) framework for developing component-based Linked Data applications:
http://ld-r.org
The LD-R
On 11 November 2015 at 18:25, Ruben Verborgh
wrote:
> Hi Kingsley,
>
> While your main points are correct, I disagree with your conclusion.
> I guess everything depends on what you mean with "The Semantic Web",
> but if I read the article with that title, we're arguably
On 11 November 2015 at 15:17, Kingsley Idehen
wrote:
> All,
>
> I think I inadvertently forgot to share this blog post [1] with this
> community.
>
Really enjoyed.
I think sem web has evolved on a number vectors
1. Big data and gov, seems to be really embracing linked
On 11 November 2015 at 23:56, Wouter Beek wrote:
> Hi Ruben, Kingsley, others,
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Ruben Verborgh
> wrote:
>
>> Of course—but the emphasis in the community has mostly been on servers,
>>
> The emphasis has been on
On 12 November 2015 at 12:45, Nicolas Chauvat
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:27:10PM -0500, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> > > To me, The Semantic Web is like Google, but then run on my machine.
> >
> > To me its just a Web of Data [...]
>
> Ruben says "The
On 5 November 2015 at 00:21, Silvio Peroni wrote:
> Dear friends,
>
> We are pleased to announce a new LOD dataset
>
> http://www.sparontologies.net/mediatype
>
> that makes available media types defined as proper resources in RDF,
> according to the SPAR Ontologies [1]
On 26 August 2015 at 10:45, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya nmihi...@fi.upm.es
wrote:
Hi,
Is there a standard or widely used way of discovering a query endpoint
(SPARQL/LDF) associated with a given Linked Data resource?
I know that a client can use the follow your nose and related link
On 4 September 2015 at 12:02, Stian Soiland-Reyes <
soiland-re...@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> +1 to minimize RDF/XML use!
>
> I do also think there is the same danger now of JSON-LD being seen as
> a dialect of JSON, rather than a way to serialize RDF.
>
> I have seen people trying to do
On 3 September 2015 at 19:03, David Booth wrote:
> Side note: RDF/XML was the first RDF serialization standardized, over 15
> years ago, at a time when XML was all the buzz. Since then other
> serializations have been standardized that are far more human friendly to
> read and
On 24 January 2016 at 16:58, Alexandre Rademaker
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone know vocabs for describe votes and suggestions? Our Portuguese
> Wordnet in http://wnpt.brlcloud.com/wn/ is distributed from its
> beginning as RDF. We have recently develop this web
On 1 April 2016 at 15:01, Sarven Capadisli wrote:
> There is overwhelming research [1, 2, 3] and I think it is evident at this
> point that owl:sameAs is used inarticulately in the LOD cloud.
>
> The research that I've done makes me conclude that we need to do a massive
> sweep
On 14 July 2016 at 17:16, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> On 7/8/16 10:40 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > Smart Agents and Bots are now hot topics across the industry at large.
> >
> > Bearing in mind years of knowledge and experience this community has in
> >
101 - 200 of 203 matches
Mail list logo