To abuse an overused quote: And now you have two problems.
Firstly, you have an additional kitten (URI) to pay for with the
descriptions resource in addition to the other URIs.
Secondly, the semantics of your descriptions resource are unclear. Is it an
information resource or not? Is it a
Hi Nathan,
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Robert Sanderson wrote:
Secondly, the semantics of your descriptions resource are unclear. Is it
an
information resource or not? Is it a conceptual set of all of the
formats
of the descriptions of the original
A quick question...
2010/4/13 Niklas Lindström lindstr...@gmail.com:
I've found it very valuable to formally declare the pieces from which
an URI is to be composed of. Especially in our environment where we
have a central design of the URI:s, but decentralized publishing of
data (which is of
I have to add my 2 cents here.
However, if you see some specific harm in permitting statements about
literals, please tell us what that harm would be.
The specific harm that I would see is that statements would be made about
literals given some particular context of that literal, rather than
Is there some reason not to use LODE?
http://linkedevents.org/ontology/
-- Rob Sanderson
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Toby Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 13:26:15 +0100
Michael Schneider schn...@fzi.de wrote:
For your information, the term EON is also used as the
I agree with Kingsley, an identifier that identifies more than one
thing is a common name, not an identifier.
To say that a URI can identify multiple things is as meaningless as
saying that the string Rob identifies me.
That is all. Carry on.
Rob Sanderson
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 7:42 AM,
Dear all,
We would like to invite you to participate in the Open Annotation
Community Group, in particular to discuss the use of RDF and Linked
Data. We have run into some interesting issues which we would love to
discuss in more detail.
Open Annotation is a RDF / Linked Data specification
Hi Matteo,
The Annotation Ontology has merged with Open Annotation Collaboration
in the W3C community group:
http://www.w3.org/community/openannotation/
And Paolo is co-chair along with myself.
We're *just* about to release the next version of the Community Group
draft, so your interest comes
Hi David,
(And cc'ing the Open Annotation list as well)
Yes that looks fine. If the annotation is about the citation, rather
than the paper, then it should definitely target a resource that
identifies the citation. I don't want to comment on the use of Named
Graphs (see [2]) for the citation,
Dear all,
Thank you for the comments on Open Annotation!
We agree, of course, that fragments are extremely important. In Open
Annotation we have a hybrid approach consisting of three parts:
* If the resource can be described solely using fragments, then we promote
that.
meaning of house in the sense of abode/a
You can not put RDF into the href attribute and you would need extra
infrastructure (a server + service for minting and resolving URIs) to send
around a simple link.
--Sebastian
Am 03.05.2013 09:23, schrieb Robert Sanderson:
Dear all,
Thank
Hi David, Jan,
This came up in a recent modelling discussion around Open Annotation[1] and
its use in Shared Canvas[2].
Open Annotation has a Choice resource (think rdf:Alt) where, for example,
the body of the annotation could be an HTML document or the equivalent text
in PDF from a different
We have successfully used two different tools in this realm:
1. JSON-LD. This doesn't quite fit your definition, but JSON-LD is an easy
to produce and consume RDF serialization. http://www.json-ld.org/
2. RdfQuery. A JQuery extension that handles various RDF serializations.
are welcomed on the discussion list at
iiif-disc...@googlegroups.com
Sincerely and on behalf of the community,
Benjamin Albritton
Michael Appleby
Robert Sanderson
Stuart Snydman
Jon Stroop
Simeon Warner
[1] Loris: https://github.com/pulibrary/loris/
[2] IIP Server: https://github.com/ruven/iipsrv
And to pile on, +1 to WebACL for this. We also use it in the Fedora4 (LDP
based) repository solution.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Víctor Rodríguez Doncel <
vrodrig...@fi.upm.es> wrote:
> Sebastian,
>
> I understand you want to implement some sort of RBAC.
> I believe WebAccessControl
15 matches
Mail list logo
