voiD to describe graphs

2009-01-30 Thread Toby Inkster
My parser http://buzzword.org.uk/swignition/ understands a variety of techniques for embedding triples in HTML (and a number of other formats), but until recently had kept them all in one big graph. I'm now beginning the work needed to make it aware of multiple graphs. So for example, the

Re: LOD in the webpage

2009-05-06 Thread Toby Inkster
, they can do an AJAX lookup for it on geonames.org and the site will save that location into their profile as a URI. Under the hood, geonames' JSON API is used, because parsing RDF/XML in Javascript in a web browser doesn't sound like my idea of a good time. -- Toby Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk

Re: OWL and LOD

2009-05-12 Thread Toby Inkster
is capable of that.)  -- Toby Inkster m...@tobyinkster.co.uk

Re: last.fm events RDFizing

2009-05-12 Thread Toby Inkster
-Triples of my profile on my local installation: http://nixtape.g5n.co.uk/rdf.php?fmt=ntpage=/user/tobyink I'm on #swig today if you have any suggestions for improvements. -- Toby Inkster m...@tobyinkster.co.uk

Re: OWL and LOD

2009-05-13 Thread Toby Inkster
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 00:59 +0100, Hugh Glaser wrote: But generating equivalency predicates for every conceivable domain is not the way to go, I would suggest. That's not quite what I meant. Rather that OWL should provide the right tools to enable existing domain-specific vocabularies (e.g.

Linked railway data for the UK

2009-05-14 Thread Toby Inkster
I saw this on the linkeddata.org shopping list a few days ago, and thought it would be a good thing to noodle with in my spare time. So I've turned my screen scraping expertise at various railway-related websites and put together this: http://ontologi.es/rail/ It's still at a very early stage.

Re: DBpedia user, who are you?

2009-05-20 Thread Toby Inkster
be especially efficient in terms of dbpedia's CPU time. The other thing I'd like to see is some sort of better reasoning about redirects. I don't know quite how, but there must be something better than what we have now. -- Toby Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk

Re: DBpedia user, who are you?

2009-05-20 Thread Toby Inkster
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 14:57 +0100, Yves Raimond wrote: 3) An interface for submitting out-going links, instead of having to ping the dbpedia list each time Ooh!! This can be done?! Ping! http://ontologi.es/rail/links_dbpedia.ttl -- Toby Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk

Re: ANN: sameas.org

2009-06-04 Thread Toby Inkster
; ex:accordingTo http:/// , http:/// ; ex:discoveredByUs 2009-04-05 ] . Harry Halpin's IRW ontology may also be of use, but I've not entirely been able to figure out how it works. It's here: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/web/irw.owl -- Toby Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk

Re: ANN: sameas.org

2009-06-09 Thread Toby Inkster
to be able to cope with blank nodes. -- Toby Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk

Re: Common Tag - semantic tagging convention

2009-06-12 Thread Toby Inkster
especially well. And this includes MOAT and SCOT which are built on Richard's ontology. (And SIOC and SKOS use ideas which are fairly compatible with Richard's ontology too - indeed, tag:Tag is a subclass of skos:Concept.) -- Toby Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk

Re: Common Tag - semantic tagging convention

2009-06-12 Thread Toby Inkster
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 11:47 +0100, Toby Inkster wrote: In essence it seems ctag:Tag is a sort of hybrid between tag:Tagging and tag:Tag. There's nothing wrong with that per se, but it does mean that your mappings to Richard Newman's tag ontology are probably never going to work especially well

Re: Common Tag - semantic tagging convention

2009-06-12 Thread Toby Inkster
of modification and other document lifecycle dates are valuable to most publishers. The date an article has had a particular tag added though is probably of secondary importance. -- Toby Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk

Re: gimmee some data!

2009-06-15 Thread Toby Inkster
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 01:03 +0100, Hugh Glaser wrote: On 15/06/2009 00:18, Toby A Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk wrote: I still need to add some 303 redirects in there. Better hurry up, people might find it... http://sameas.org/html?uri=http://ontologi.es/place/GB-WAR It was late, so I was

Re: gimmee some data!

2009-06-15 Thread Toby Inkster
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 10:38 +0100, Ian Davis wrote: I noticed a slight encoding error on http://ontologi.es/place/ I think you have unescaped ampersands in there. Thanks, fixed. Had remembered to escape '', '' and '' (which are never going to appear in place names really) but not ampersand!

Re: gimmee some data!

2009-06-16 Thread Toby Inkster
some kind of cross-links out. owl:sameAs assuming that the ontologies we're using are compatible enough; ov:similarTo otherwise. PS: your related manifestations links are broken (need /LODThing prepended to href attributes). -- Toby Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk

Re: gimmee some data!

2009-06-16 Thread Toby Inkster
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 07:30 -0400, Ross Singer wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Toby Inkstert...@g5n.co.uk wrote: Definitely. Since it's not an absolute that the coverage of ISBNs are 1:1 (in either direction, but definitely from yours to here) -- how to determine what actually exists?

Re: gimmee some data!

2009-06-17 Thread Toby Inkster
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 22:31 -0400, Ross Singer wrote: http://dilettantes.code4lib.org/LODThing/isbns/0002157926#book You probably want to remove the resource RDFa attribute from the Wikipedia references. That's because: http://dilettantes.code4lib.org/LODThing/isbns/0002157926#book

Re: RDFa vs RDF/XML and content negotiation

2009-06-23 Thread Toby Inkster
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 13:09 +0100, Toby Inkster wrote: For my railway data http://ontologi.es/rail/ I publish static XHTML +RDFa files (all but two of which are generated by script) and use a combination of Apache .htaccess files and small PHP scripts to dynamically generate other formats

Re: Visualization of domain and range

2009-06-25 Thread Toby Inkster
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 13:49 +0200, Bernhard Schandl wrote: Something like this might be a nice visualisation: http://buzzword.org.uk/2009/domain-range-illustration.png It would be even better to flip it so that the ontology level is on top of the instance level, so to be in line with

Re: .htaccess a major bottleneck to Semantic Web adoption / Was: Re: RDFa vs RDF/XML and content negotiation

2009-06-26 Thread Toby Inkster
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 09:35 +0200, Dan Brickley wrote: Does every major RDF toolkit have an integrated RDFa parser already? No - and even for those that do, it's often rather flaky. Seseme/Rio doesn't have one in its stable release, though I believe one is in development for 3.0.

Re: .htaccess a major bottleneck to Semantic Web adoption / Was: Re: RDFa vs RDF/XML and content negotiation

2009-06-29 Thread Toby Inkster
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 13:30 +0100, Mark Birbeck wrote: If we go back a step, RDFa was carefully designed so that it could carry any combination of the RDF concepts in an HTML document. In the end we dropped reification and lists, because it didn't seem that the RDF community itself was clear

Re: .htaccess a major bottleneck to Semantic Web adoption / Was: Re: RDFa vs RDF/XML and content negotiation

2009-07-08 Thread Toby Inkster
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 15:13 +0100, Mark Birbeck wrote: The original point of this thread seemed to me to be saying that if .htaccess is the key to the semantic web, then it's never going to happen. It simply isn't the key to the semantic web though. .htaccess is a simple way to configure

Re: Dons flame resistant (3 hours) interface about Linked Data URIs

2009-07-10 Thread Toby Inkster
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 10:40 +0100, Steve Harris wrote: Personally I think that RDF/XML doesn't help, it's too hard to write by hand. MicroTurtle, the sloppy RDF format: http://buzzword.org.uk/2009/microturtle/spec I really need to document my implementation's error recovery too. It

Re: temporary URLs on Second Life

2009-07-20 Thread Toby Inkster
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 11:10 +0200, Dan Brickley wrote: Well, we can't have it both ways. Either we want everything of interest to have HTTP URIs. Or we want all HTTP URIs to de-reference usefully forever. Of course, but there's a difference between URLs getting broken because resources have

Re: Merging Databases

2009-07-21 Thread Toby Inkster
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 19:52 +0300, Bernhard Schandl wrote: I would say: Never assert sameAs. It's just too big a hammer. Instead use a wider palette of relationships to connect entities to other ones. which ones would you recommend? skos:exactMatch = asserts that the two resources

Re: ANN: RDF2RDFa: Turning RDF/XML into Snippets for Copy-and-Paste

2009-08-14 Thread Toby Inkster
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 23:50 +0200, Martin Hepp (UniBW) wrote: The tool is available at http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/tools/rdf2rdfa/ A few bits of feedback: 1. The contents of the @content attributes don't seem to be properly HTML-escaped. This is especially problematic for literals that

Re: ProductDB

2009-08-14 Thread Toby Inkster
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 15:17 +0200, Martin Hepp (UniBW) wrote: Note that the GoodRelations seeks patterns allows using the full amount of details and the same vocabulary for specifying wish lists you can say that you are interested in TV sets with at least 11 inches of screen size etc. So it

Re: ProductDB

2009-08-14 Thread Toby Inkster
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 18:12 +0200, Simon Reinhardt wrote: barter:wants owl:propertyChainAxiom (gr:seeks gr:includesObject gr:typeOfGood) . owl:propertyChainAxiom = awesome. I really need to take a closer look at OWL2. Without knowing about owl:propertyChainAxiom, I would have suggested N3:

Re: data.gov now live with RDFa

2009-08-19 Thread Toby Inkster
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 06:50 -0400, rick wrote: http://www.data.gov/ The page has two triples. Ten by my count. The namespace for Dublin Core is wrong though. It's currently pointed at http://dublincore.org/documents/2008/01/14/dcmi-terms/ which is a documentation file. The namespace should be

Re: Top three levels of Dewey Decimal Classification published as linked data

2009-08-20 Thread Toby Inkster
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 14:27 -0400, Panzer,Michael wrote: I would like to announce the availability of the DDC Summaries as a linked data service that uses SKOS and other vocabularies for representation [1]. Please take a look if you like. Comments, suggestions, and advice are really

Project idea: cviki (or some better name than that)

2009-09-01 Thread Toby Inkster
I think this is a great idea for a project, but I don't have time to do it myself... 1. Set up a wiki (pref MediaWiki) for people to publish their CVs/ Resumés. This might need slightly different access restrictions than normal MediaWiki installations to prevent people from negatively

Re: What about music-related URIs???

2009-09-07 Thread Toby Inkster
On 6 Sep 2009, at 17:06, Dan Brickley wrote: ps. i am just running MusicBrainz Picard tagger over all my mp3s (includes all the CDs I ever bought...). ... Is there a tool / workflow people here can recommend to turn all that into RDF locally? does picard keep a db somewhere, or all metadata is

Re: SPARQL: restricting DESCRIBE queries

2009-09-07 Thread Toby Inkster
On 7 Sep 2009, at 15:36, Bernhard Schandl wrote: DESCRIBE ?concept WHERE { ?concept rdfs:label Berlin@en . } LIMIT 2 returns some ~4500 triples because it includes the description of dbpedia:Berlin. Any suggestions how I could limit the number of triples returned by such a query? Fake

Re: Quick Update re. DBpedia RDFa pages

2009-09-18 Thread Toby Inkster
On 18 Sep 2009, at 14:26, Kingsley Idehen wrote: We've enhanced the initial release of DBpedia's HTML+RDFa pages. All the literals are @en. Would be nice to have a few xml:lang attributes where appropriate. -- Toby A Inkster mailto:m...@tobyinkster.co.uk http://tobyinkster.co.uk

Re: how to consume linked data

2009-09-25 Thread Toby Inkster
On 25 Sep 2009, at 07:41, Graham Klyne wrote: Interesting... I'm doing work at the moment with CIDOC-CRM (http:// cidoc.ics.forth.gr/) and its expression in OWL (http:// www8.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/IMMD8/Services/cidoc-crm/ versions.html). Have you seen Simon Reinhardt's recent OWL2

Re: Linked (genealogy) data

2009-10-02 Thread Toby Inkster
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 21:51 +0100, John Goodwin wrote: I've been working on my family tree as linked data in my spare time. I've been looking at doing something similar but haven't gotten around to it yet. I have quite a bit on paper, but very little typed up. My plan was to enter everything

Re: Newbie LOD Questions :)

2009-10-29 Thread Toby Inkster
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 23:48 +, Nathan wrote: - which are the preferred ontologies to use when trying to be very specific about a subject (rather than dc.subject dc.creator etc which are essentially free text based not URI identifier based) It's worth mentioning that RDFa makes it pretty

Re: Subjects Tagging - Help?

2009-11-04 Thread Toby Inkster
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 18:16 +, Nathan wrote: Hoping for a little bit of guidance here on tagging assigning subjects to content etc - I can't quite grasp how to describe what an item of content is about # TIMTOWTDI # Here's a few abbreviations for starters... @prefix dct:

Re: Subjects Tagging - Help?

2009-11-04 Thread Toby Inkster
On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 14:26 +, Nathan wrote: Primary question in this scenario is why dc:subject through to local tag then tag associated with moat:localMeaning rather than dc:subject straight through to dbpedia resource? ... .. as from the dc docs I gathered that This term (dc:subject)

Re: differentFrom?

2009-11-16 Thread Toby Inkster
On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 22:52 +, Richard Light wrote: But owl:disjointWith does rather better (scoring 19979). owl:disjointWith serves a rather different purpose though. The following classes are owl:differentFrom each other: ex:AcademyAwardWinner ex:GrammyAwardWinner

Re: Data linking to Geonames

2009-11-17 Thread Toby Inkster
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 17:31 +0100, Bernard Vatant wrote: I would like to get updated estimation about the size of the linked data using geonames URIs (outside Geonames publication itself, of course). libre.fm profiles include a location field. After filling in this field in the edit profile

Re: RDF Update Feeds

2009-11-17 Thread Toby Inkster
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 16:45 +0100, Georgi Kobilarov wrote: How do we deal with RDF diffs? Talis' changeset vocab is a good start: http://n2.talis.com/wiki/Changesets It has enough level of details for changes to be rewound, replayed, etc. -- Toby A Inkster mailto:m...@tobyinkster.co.uk

Re: RDF Update Feeds + URI time travel on HTTP-level

2009-11-26 Thread Toby Inkster
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 00:04 +, Richard Cyganiak wrote: If you choose such a rather broad definition for agent-driven negotiation, then you surely must count the practice of sending different responses based on client IP or User-Agent header, both of which are common on the Web, as

Re: attaching multiple licenses

2009-12-06 Thread Toby Inkster
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 19:40 +0100, Georgi Kobilarov wrote: Say I publish one URI for an artist: http://example.org/resource/Madonna I aggregate information from multiple sources about that artist, and those sources have different licenses. One triple comes from a source under GNU FDL,

Re: quick advice on content negotiation

2009-12-08 Thread Toby Inkster
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 16:43 +, Nathan wrote: I've implemented content negotiation as follows: where we have a URI resource http://example.org/user/23 when that URI is requested then content negotiation using the Accept header kicks in, if any of the RDF formats are specified and data

Re: attaching multiple licenses

2009-12-09 Thread Toby Inkster
On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 07:15 -0500, Kingsley Idehen wrote: Yes, I still stand by my case for HTTP URIs as implicit vehicles of Attribution. http://dbpedia.org/resource/Arthur_Brown_(musician) http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Person/homeTown

Re: Creating JSON from RDF

2009-12-13 Thread Toby Inkster
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 21:42 +, Jeni Tennison wrote: To put this in context, what I think we should aim for is a pure publishing format that is optimised for approachability for normal developers, *not* an interchange format. RDF/JSON [1] and the SPARQL results JSON format [2] aren't

Re: RDF, XML, XSLT: Grit

2010-01-19 Thread Toby Inkster
On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 23:32 +0100, Christoph LANGE wrote: … of that kind: I have successfully done some XSLT processing with RXR (http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/RXR, http://www.dajobe.org/papers/xmleurope2004/). I found it very nice for XSLT processing, as there is exactly one way for

[Fwd: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43 (combining fragments)]

2010-03-10 Thread Toby Inkster
I wonder if the semantics of the proposed solution to ticket 43 below have implications for httpRange-14? Original Message Subject: Request for feedback on HTTP Location header syntax + semantics, Re: Issues 43 and 185, was: Issue 43

Re: RDFa for Turtles 2: HTML embedding

2010-03-11 Thread Toby Inkster
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 22:50 +0100, Danny Ayers wrote: On 10 March 2010 18:19, Paul Houle ontolo...@gmail.com wrote: head xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xmlns:dcterms=http://purl.org/dc/terms/; meta rel=dcterms:creator content=Ataru Morobishi /head ... This does bend the

Re: RDFa for Turtles

2010-03-11 Thread Toby Inkster
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 12:03 -0500, Paul Houle wrote: meta rel={predicate} content={object} / meta rel={predicate} content={object} datatype={type_of_object} / You want to use @property, not @rel. Also, don't forget @xml:lang! Am I missing anything? To bullet-proof it, you may want to

Re: Notes on RDFa For Turtles

2010-03-14 Thread Toby Inkster
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 10:21 -0500, Paul Houle wrote: I think the differential use of href and resource here maximizes backwards and forwards compatibility. It is non-conformant to use legacy link/@rel elements if @about is not set in the html element. Also, link about=”{any_subject}”

Re: SPARQL: sorting resources by label?

2010-03-14 Thread Toby Inkster
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 04:16 +0100, Axel Rauschmayer wrote: OPTIONAL { ?subj ?labelPred ?label . FILTER ( (?labelPred = http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label) # (1) ) FILTER( isLiteral(?label) ) } I use

Re: SPARQL: sorting resources by label?

2010-03-14 Thread Toby Inkster
On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 21:01 +0100, Danny Ayers wrote: On 14 March 2010 20:04, Toby Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk wrote: I use something like: OPTIONAL { ?subject ?labelprop ?label . GRAPH http://buzzword.org.uk/2009/label-properties { ?labelprop a http

Public domain icons

2010-05-09 Thread Toby Inkster
I'm writing an RDF linter/visualiser and need some icons, preferably public domain. I've been using Tango, but they don't cover all the concepts I need. I want a coherent icon set covering the following: - Person - Organisation - Group (of people) - Document - Project - Book

Re: Linking a vCard to its holder

2010-05-15 Thread Toby Inkster
On Fri, 14 May 2010 14:23:47 +0100 Ian Davis li...@iandavis.com wrote: http://open.vocab.org/terms/businessCard Nathan has also posted this, but http://purl.org/uF/hCard/terms/hasCard has pretty much identical semantics. It's part of a vocabulary I put together a couple of years ago

Re: Migrating from slash to fragment

2010-05-15 Thread Toby Inkster
On Fri, 14 May 2010 17:53:50 +0100 Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote: I'm wondering if there are any recommended paths for migrating RDF or specifically an ontology from slash to fragment URIs (?) Cool URIs don't change. -- Toby A Inkster mailto:m...@tobyinkster.co.uk http://tobyinkster.co.uk

Re: Migrating from slash to fragment

2010-05-23 Thread Toby Inkster
On Tue, 18 May 2010 19:39:02 +0900 KangHao Lu (Kenny) kennyl...@csail.mit.edu wrote: I think this can be generalized and it shouldn't be con:preferredURI but something like link:preferredURI. Have you taken a look at http://purl.org/NET/uri#? It's a vocab for talking about the different

Re: Request for Feedback, Suggestions on TaxonConcept Species Concepts

2010-06-06 Thread Toby Inkster
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 18:06:08 -0500 Peter DeVries pete.devr...@gmail.com wrote: I would appreciate feedback on these models and any suggestions for how they could be improved. :-) The following: @prefix txn: http://lod.taxonconcept.org/ontology/txn.owl# .

Re: Org. Namespace Example

2010-06-23 Thread Toby Inkster
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:52:29 -0700 (PDT) Gannon Dick gannon_d...@yahoo.com wrote: An RDF/XML example for each type is below These examples are strange. Firstly, bridges and beaches are not typically considered organisations. Secondly, you appear to be using some of the classes defined by the

Re: The Ordered List Ontology

2010-06-30 Thread Toby Inkster
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:54:20 +0100 Dan Brickley dan...@danbri.org wrote: That said, i'm sure sameAs and differentIndividual (or however it is called) claims could probably make a mess, if added or removed... You can create some pretty awesome messes even without OWL: # An rdf:List

Re: Subjects as Literals

2010-06-30 Thread Toby Inkster
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:54:47 -0600 Robert Sanderson azarot...@gmail.com wrote: London dcterms:isPartOf England That is true only for the particular London which is the capital of England, not London, Texas, London, Ontario or London in Kiribati. Consider: London dcterms:isPartOf

Re: Subjects as Literals, [was Re: The Ordered List Ontology]

2010-06-30 Thread Toby Inkster
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:18:25 -0700 Jeremy Carroll jer...@topquadrant.com wrote: Here are the reasons I voted this way: - it will mess up RDF/XML No it won't - it will just mean that RDF/XML is only capable of representing a subset of RDF graphs. And guess what? That's already the case. --

Re: Show me the money - (was Subjects as Literals)

2010-07-01 Thread Toby Inkster
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:05:54 -0400 Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote: W3C only officially acknowledges RDF/XML as Markup Language for RDF Data Model. I hear this time and time again, but it is not true anymore. XHTML+RDFa 1.0 became a W3C Recommendation in October 2008. It has the

Re: Subjects as Literals

2010-07-06 Thread Toby Inkster
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010 17:43:17 -0500 Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote: Well, nobody is suggesting allowing literals as predicates (although in fact the RDF semantics would easily extend to this usage, if required, and the analogous structures are allowed, and do have genuine use cases, in

Re: Subjects as Literals

2010-07-06 Thread Toby Inkster
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 16:30:06 +0200 Michael Schneider schn...@fzi.de wrote: What do you mean by false statement? False in the same sense that this is false: http://danbri.org/foaf.rdf#danbri foaf:name Barry Chuckle . Whether it is provably false by an automated agent is

Re: RDF Extensibility

2010-07-07 Thread Toby Inkster
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 16:11:19 -0500 Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote: The world doesn't have facts like that in it. Classes and properties are intellectual constructs, not the stuff of reality. Hell, if a particle can be a wave, then surely a class can be a property. Anyway, RDF doesn't make

Re: RDF Extensibility

2010-07-08 Thread Toby Inkster
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 12:16:06 -0500 Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote: I would veto this option. To do this would be a lot more work than not doing it; and it would greatly complicate the semantic specification, which would have to keep track of this 'meaninglessness'. Why would tools need to

Re: FYI: Blog on HTTP Link header and host-wide well-known URI-s, and Linked Data

2010-07-08 Thread Toby Inkster
On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 07:03:21 +0200 Ivan Herman i...@w3.org wrote: http://www.w3.org/QA/2010/07/new_opportunities_for_linked_d.html Not sure why my comment yesterday has still not shown up, but for the benefit of these lists... I've been supporting some of these technologies in my Perl modules

Re: CPAN as linked data

2010-07-09 Thread Toby Inkster
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 15:20 +0100, Toby Inkster wrote: This lunch time I threw together a quick Linked Data wrapper around CPAN::SQLite. And today I've added a few updates. The most immediately apparent is that all data is available as RDFa. Example author: http://purl.org/NET/cpan-uri

Re: spam

2010-07-17 Thread Toby Inkster
On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:02:19 +0100 Richard Light rich...@light.demon.co.uk wrote: If [a museum] were to follow the dbpedia model, and publish a set of [unrelated] triples with the object identifier as subject, embedded in their web page for the object, there is nothing to stop someone else

Re: Predicate for external links on dbpedialite.org?

2010-07-17 Thread Toby Inkster
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:09:36 +0100 Nicholas Humfrey nicholas.humf...@bbc.co.uk wrote: I have added external links to dbpedialite, for example see Berlin: http://dbpedialite.org/things/3354 Is there a better predicate to use than rdfs:seeAlso? You could use the very matter-of-fact

Re: The Counter Ontology

2010-07-21 Thread Toby Inkster
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:56:05 +0200 Bob Ferris z...@elbklang.net wrote: How can I make sure that the value of my counter concept is of the type xsd:Integer? co:Counter rdfs:subClassOf [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:onProperty rdf:value ;

Re: The Counter Ontology

2010-07-21 Thread Toby Inkster
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:07:25 +0200 Bob Ferris z...@elbklang.net wrote: Finally, what do you think should we use now: rdf:value and some restrictions on it for co:Counter or co:count as it is already defined + a cardinality restriction of 1 on co:Counter for co:count? I'm indifferent as to

LOB - linked open bard

2010-09-03 Thread Toby Inkster
Every play by Shakespeare in RDF: http://ontologi.es/lob/ For example: http://ontologi.es/lob/Hamlet.ttl Two Noble Kinsmen is not included, as I couldn't find a good XML version to convert to RDF, and Shakespeare only co-wrote it anyway. -- Toby A Inkster

Re: LOB - linked open bard

2010-09-04 Thread Toby Inkster
On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 14:44:38 -0400 Ed Summers e...@pobox.com wrote: Do you have idea where the file URIs are coming from? rapper -o turtle http://ontologi.es/lob/ Thanks - fixed. index.rdf and vocab.rdf had been generated by rapper from index.ttl and vocab.ttl, but without setting the base

WordNet RDF

2010-09-08 Thread Toby Inkster
Dear all, I've created a think RDF wrapper around the WordNet 3.0 database (nouns only). For example: http://ontologi.es/WordNet/data/Fool This is nothing especially new - Dan Brickley did something similar with WordNet 1.6, many moons ago, and the W3C has also published an RDF version of

Re: WordNet RDF

2010-09-21 Thread Toby Inkster
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:45:07 +0200 Antoine Isaac ais...@few.vu.nl wrote: Very interesting! I'm curious though: what's the application scenario that made you create this version? It makes it easy to insult people in RDF. #you a wordnet:Fool . #!!! More seriously, it's mostly just

Re: Reification alternative

2010-10-13 Thread Toby Inkster
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 15:02:01 +0200 Mirko idonthaveenoughinformat...@googlemail.com wrote: I try to understand alternatives to reification for Linked Data publishing, since reification is discouraged. For completeness, as it's not been mentioned, one method would be to publish two files. This

Re: Hash vs Slash in relation to the 303 vs 200 debate (was: Is 303 really necessary - demo)

2010-11-06 Thread Toby Inkster
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:33:34 + Ian Davis li...@iandavis.com wrote: On a practical level using frags can be inefficient when your linked data output is backed by a triple store. If you use a slash URI then generating the data for html/xml/turtle output is just a simple describe uri. For

Fw: [foaf-dev] EON - event of note

2010-11-06 Thread Toby Inkster
Begin forwarded message... Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 00:32:50 + From: Toby Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk To: foaf-dev foaf-...@lists.foaf-project.org Subject: [foaf-dev] EON - event of note Let's do a bit of collaborative work to flesh out a FOAF-like lightweight vocabulary for describing events

Re: [foaf-dev] EON - event of note

2010-11-07 Thread Toby Inkster
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 13:26:15 +0100 Michael Schneider schn...@fzi.de wrote: For your information, the term EON is also used as the acronym of the International Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools, an (almost-) yearly event that exists since 2002. See [1] for the proceedings of the

Re: [foaf-dev] EON - event of note

2010-11-07 Thread Toby Inkster
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 14:50:58 -0700 Robert Sanderson azarot...@gmail.com wrote: Is there some reason not to use LODE? http://linkedevents.org/ontology/ A few, though they could possibly be addressed by a revision of LODE: 1. lode:Event appears to be restricted to events which have already

Re: Is 303 really necessary?

2010-11-08 Thread Toby Inkster
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 13:22:09 + Ian Davis m...@iandavis.com wrote: http://iand.posterous.com/is-303-really-necessary Ian brings up numerous difficulties with 303 responses. The two biggest issues in my opinion are: 1. 303s can be tricky to configure unless you know your

Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates

2010-11-08 Thread Toby Inkster
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 15:53:34 + Ian Davis li...@iandavis.com wrote: Suppose I assign the ID 'mars' to represent the planet mars in my RDFa document. I can then refer to it using http://example.com/foo#mars. What does it mean when my javascript calls document.getElementById('mars')? Should I

Re: Is 303 really necessary?

2010-11-08 Thread Toby Inkster
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010 10:24:43 + Ian Davis m...@iandavis.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote: Not at all, I'm saying that if big-corp makes a /web crawler/ that describes what documents are about and publishes RDF triples  /toucan :primaryTopic

Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates

2010-11-08 Thread Toby Inkster
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:05:09 + Phil Archer phil.arc...@talis.com wrote: I wrote a short blog entry-like piece last night [1]. My basic point being that I agree wholly with Ian's analysis but disagree with his conclusions and I argue the case for a new HTTP status code. I also had that

Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?)

2010-11-10 Thread Toby Inkster
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 17:04:44 -0500 (EST) joel sachs jsa...@csee.umbc.edu wrote: I think we can, though we might not be properly understood, e.g. Kingsley was great in Gandhi and Sexy Beast. Wasn't this part of the summer's argument regarding literals as rdf:subjects , i.e. But:

Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200

2010-11-10 Thread Toby Inkster
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:30:35 -0800 Bradley Allen bradley.p.al...@gmail.com wrote: Nathan- I think you are overly discounting scalability problems with fragment URIs. Most of the use cases I am dealing with in moving linked data into production at Elsevier entail SKOS concept schemes with

Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200

2010-11-10 Thread Toby Inkster
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:13:42 -0800 Bradley Allen bradley.p.al...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks; that's a useful example. So the convention in that case is to append '#concept' to the end of the IR? #concept is what LOC is using for their SKOS Concepts. #me or similar might be more conventional for

Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200

2010-11-10 Thread Toby Inkster
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 23:07:19 + Toby Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk wrote: http://id.loc.gov/authorities/sh85121735#concept http://id.loc.gov/authorities/sh85121591#concept http://id.loc.gov/authorities/sh85119315#concept http://id.loc.gov/authorities/sh86001831#concept http://id.loc.gov

Re: survey: who uses the triple foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label?

2010-11-12 Thread Toby Inkster
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:08:36 +0100 Dan Brickley dan...@danbri.org wrote: This is one of several things that OWL DL oriented tools (eg. http://www.mygrid.org.uk/OWL/Validator) don't seem to like, since it mixes application schemas with the W3C builtins. DL is a tiresome bore. Add a few more

Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game?

2010-11-20 Thread Toby Inkster
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 18:28:24 +0100 Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote: 1. Would each 'location' be a document or a resource? Web of Documents vs Web of Resources? 2. Could we use foaf:image and dcterms:desc for the game pages? 3. How would you model the link on each page?

Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game?

2010-11-21 Thread Toby Inkster
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 15:05:12 +0100 Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote: The way I've written this client, the nodes themselves can extend the pre-defined link directions:        #node1 #hide-under-rug #node2 .        #hide-under-rug                rdfs:label hide under

Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game?

2010-11-21 Thread Toby Inkster
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 20:43:34 +0800 Joshua Shinavier j...@fortytwo.net wrote: 1) a node should not be *only* a location, but should also include a game-specific context. E.g. instead of a node for London, have a node for running from zombies in London, with a geo:location link to the DBpedia

Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game?

2010-11-21 Thread Toby Inkster
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 21:24:22 +0100 Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote: Im also looking for a CYOA game that has the data available. http://outer-court.com/goodies/madv.htm http://jerz.setonhill.edu/if/crowther/ Aside: this is quite a cool article - http://samizdat.cc/cyoa/ --

Re: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo

2010-11-24 Thread Toby Inkster
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:12:50 + Ben O'Steen bost...@gmail.com wrote: That's not the point that is being made. A competent developer, using all the available links and documentation, spending days researching and learning and trying to implement, is unable to make an app using a triplestore

Re: Is 303 really necessary?

2010-11-28 Thread Toby Inkster
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:52:21 +0100 Giovanni Tummarello giovanni.tummare...@deri.org wrote: is clearly a web page but its also an actor, it is pointed by their graph in other pages as such and the same page contains the opengraph triple type actor That's consistent with the definition of the

Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game?

2010-12-01 Thread Toby Inkster
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 23:06:42 +0100 Melvin Carvalho melvincarva...@gmail.com wrote: I think the next thing I need to model is 'items'. At present need to work out a way to say a location has an item. Perhaps model it the other direction? item22 game:initial_position node394 . --

  1   2   >