Re: Hash vs Slash in relation to the 303 vs 200 debate (was: Is 303 really necessary - demo)

2010-11-07 Thread Ian Davis
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Toby Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk wrote: Not necessarily. If you take your ex:isDescribedBy predicate and add that to a triple store where the non-Information-Resource resources are identified using hash URIs, then the SPARQL query is just:        DESCRIBE uri ?res

Hash vs Slash in relation to the 303 vs 200 debate (was: Is 303 really necessary - demo)

2010-11-06 Thread Ian Davis
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote: URI resolution is essentially:  dereference( uri.toAbsolute() ); Which gives us the simplicity and semantic indirection which we need. Use frags, forget HTTP, know that uri#frag is never going to be a document (unless you

Re: Hash vs Slash in relation to the 303 vs 200 debate (was: Is 303 really necessary - demo)

2010-11-06 Thread Toby Inkster
On Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:33:34 + Ian Davis li...@iandavis.com wrote: On a practical level using frags can be inefficient when your linked data output is backed by a triple store. If you use a slash URI then generating the data for html/xml/turtle output is just a simple describe uri. For