Re: Vocabulary to describe software projects and their dependencies

[Tom Johnson]

This crossed my radar today: http://ontologi.es/doap-deps#

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Paul Worrall 
wrote:

> I don’t invest any more time on this project or semantic tech myself but
> if there was someone who wanted to do it I am happy to advise.
>
>
> On 10 Aug 2016, at 10:40, Ghislain Atemezing 
> wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> Le 10 août 2016 à 11:26, Paul Worrall  a
> écrit :
>
> I had been working on describing software https://sparqlycode.com/ .   It
> used DOAP and PROV and its own vocab. Produced RDF/OWL representations of
> the code, its build, version history etc.. I could’t get an early adopter
> so I abondoned it last year.
>
> Would be happy to help someone pick up on the code.
>
>
> You can also help the community by submitting the vocabulary [0] for
> inclusion into LOV [1].
> That would be great and a good way to watch any adopter of the vocab.
>
> [0] http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/suggest
> [1] lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/
>
>
>
> Paul Worrall
>
> Interition: wisdom in the web
>
> web: www.interition.net, www.zonafide.net
> email: paul.worr...@interition.net
> twitter: @interition
> mobile: +44 (0) 771 133 0213
> phone: +44 (0) 203 637 5196
> eth: 0x93d41b29acf6204c9a9f03e335988e498388a2cc
>
> Registered in England and Wales. Number 08460806
> Registered office: Elm Barn, Stoke Golding Lane, Higham on the Hill,
> Nuneaton,CV13 6ES
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 9 Aug 2016, at 07:36, Graham Klyne  wrote:
>
> On 08/08/2016 14:57, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
>
> DOAP vocabulary comes very close: https://github.com/edumbill/doap
>
> Too bad it looks to be unmaintained. Strangely, the schema does not
> seem to support relationships (dependencies) between projects.
>
>
> Just a thought:  would DOAP + PROV fit the bill?
>
> #g
> --
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D
> Mail: ghislain.atemez...@gmail.com
> Web: https://w3id.org/people/gatemezing 
> Twitter: @gatemezing
> About Me: https://about.me/ghislain.atemezing
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
-Tom Johnson

Re: Vocabulary to describe software projects and their dependencies

[Martynas Jusevičius]

Thanks everyone!

DOAP + PROV sounds like a good idea actually.

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Graham Klyne  wrote:
> On 08/08/2016 14:57, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
>>
>> DOAP vocabulary comes very close: https://github.com/edumbill/doap
>>
>> Too bad it looks to be unmaintained. Strangely, the schema does not
>> seem to support relationships (dependencies) between projects.
>
>
> Just a thought:  would DOAP + PROV fit the bill?
>
> #g
> --
>

Re: Vocabulary to describe software projects and their dependencies

[Graham Klyne]

On 08/08/2016 14:57, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:

DOAP vocabulary comes very close: https://github.com/edumbill/doap

Too bad it looks to be unmaintained. Strangely, the schema does not
seem to support relationships (dependencies) between projects.


Just a thought:  would DOAP + PROV fit the bill?

#g
--

Re: Vocabulary to describe software projects and their dependencies

[matteo casu]

Hi Martynas,

a couple of years ago, while searching for a similar use case, I came across 
this one:

https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/adms_foss/description 



> On 8 Aug 2016, at 14:57, Martynas Jusevičius  wrote:
> 
> Hey,
> 
> I am looking for a way to describe a software project in RDF, in detail.
> 
> DOAP vocabulary comes very close: https://github.com/edumbill/doap
> 
> Too bad it looks to be unmaintained. Strangely, the schema does not
> seem to support relationships (dependencies) between projects.
> 
> Are there any other vocabularies I should know about?
> 
> Please do not suggest https://schema.org/SoftwareApplication as it is
> not nearly expressive enough.
> 
> 
> Martynas
> 

Re: Vocabulary to describe software projects and their dependencies

[Tom Johnson]

You may be interested in https://github.com/codemeta/codemeta.

I've lost touch with progress on this, and not clear on the current status
w.r.t. describing dependency graphs, but I know it was a question this
group was considering in the spring.

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 6:57 AM, Martynas Jusevičius 
wrote:

> Hey,
>
> I am looking for a way to describe a software project in RDF, in detail.
>
> DOAP vocabulary comes very close: https://github.com/edumbill/doap
>
> Too bad it looks to be unmaintained. Strangely, the schema does not
> seem to support relationships (dependencies) between projects.
>
> Are there any other vocabularies I should know about?
>
> Please do not suggest https://schema.org/SoftwareApplication as it is
> not nearly expressive enough.
>
>
> Martynas
>
>


-- 
-Tom Johnson

Vocabulary to describe software projects and their dependencies

[Martynas Jusevičius]

Hey,

I am looking for a way to describe a software project in RDF, in detail.

DOAP vocabulary comes very close: https://github.com/edumbill/doap

Too bad it looks to be unmaintained. Strangely, the schema does not
seem to support relationships (dependencies) between projects.

Are there any other vocabularies I should know about?

Please do not suggest https://schema.org/SoftwareApplication as it is
not nearly expressive enough.


Martynas