On Feb 20, 2009, at 04:39, Ben Adida wrote:
Henri Sivonen wrote:
Also, if RDFa turned out to be successful in text/html (with or
without
a blessing by the HTML 5 spec), we'd be left with syntactic
complexity
in the platform. In particular, if RDFa succeeds for a couple of use
cases and
On Feb 20, 2009, at 07:49, Manu Sporny wrote:
Henri Sivonen wrote:
I'm particularly worried about ccREL succeeding to the point that an
alternative solution can no longer be launched into the market to
replace it and Free Culture then getting encumbered by the syntactic
complexity preventing
I figure it is unlikely most of you are tracking the HTTP activity.
This is of particular interest since they are doing things with a rel
value registry for the link header.
--
Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director
Henri Sivonen wrote:
I'm particularly worried about ccREL succeeding to the point that an
alternative solution can no longer be launched into the market to
replace it and Free Culture then getting encumbered by the syntactic
complexity preventing even further success.
Note that I didn't
Hello,
Firefox, Safari and Chrome report parsing error with an RDFa document which:
- has some HTML character entities (e.g. nbsp; uuml; etc)
- declares XHTML+RDFa 1.0 DOCTYPE
- delivered as application/xhtml+xml
probably because XHTML+RDFa DTD doesn't include HTML character entity
module
