On Fri, 9 May 2008, Chris Wilson wrote:
Sunava will deliver [all the objections we have had] in a concise form.
From the comments in various responses in this topic, it is clear that
expectations are extremely high for the level of detail in those
objections; that takes much time to
Responses to several of the comments so far:
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure I like the way that the bytes are made accessible, but
that's a minor detail really.
I tend to agree. The 'Creating Blobs' section and the readAs*()
methods were
Hello,
I understood that prio 1 item on the july 1st-3rd agenda is going to be
XHR2 (XDR... input). What other items are (known to be) on the agenda ?
(probably 3 days are anyway just enough to finalize XHR)
regards,
-jy
On May 10, 2008, at 11:39 PM, Chris Prince wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 1:18 AM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm not really clear on why Blobs must be distinct from ByteArrays.
The only explanation is: The primary difference is that Blobs are
immutable*, and can therefore
On May 11, 2008, at 4:08 PM, Aaron Boodman wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Both of these can be addressed by the APIs (including the worker
transfer
mechanism) making a copy, which can use a copy-on-write mechanism
to avoid
actually
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's one additional question on how this would work with ByteArray.
The read API for ByteArray is currently synchronous. Doesn't this mean
that with large files accessing bytearray[n] could block?
If the ByteArray
On May 11, 2008, at 4:40 PM, Aaron Boodman wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Here's one additional question on how this would work with
ByteArray.
The read API for ByteArray is currently synchronous. Doesn't this
mean
that with large
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, that depends on how good the OS buffer cache is at prefetching. But in
general, there would be some disk access.
It seems better if the read API is just async for this case to prevent
the problem.
I see what
On May 11, 2008, at 6:01 PM, Aaron Boodman wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Well, that depends on how good the OS buffer cache is at
prefetching. But in
general, there would be some disk access.
It seems better if the read API is just
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
It seems better if the read API is just async for this case to prevent
the problem.
It can't entirely prevent the problem. If you read a big enough chunk, it
will cause swapping which hits the disk just as much as file reads. Possibly
more,
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Aaron Boodman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
Open question: can a File be stored in a SQL database? If
so, does the database store the data or a reference (such as a path or Mac
OS X Alias)?
There
11 matches
Mail list logo
