On Wed, 31 May 2006 02:56:46 +0200, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What we could maybe do though is to return a real ECMAScript array. I
actually like this idea a lot since that'll integrate much better with
scripts than a StaticNodeList would.
That makes a lot of sense. I support
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 31 May 2006 00:11:23 +0200, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not in love with having match in the name, but I could live
with matchAll() and matchOne().
I like these names. Having short names is nice and all, but having
clear ones is even better.
liorean wrote:
On 13/05/06, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 13 May 2006 21:08:26 +0200, liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And StaticNodeList looks to me to be pretty array-like.
Well, if StaticNodeList looks that way NodeList would look that way too
and I'd therefore
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Jonas Sicking wrote:
- Third, NodeLists being live means you cannot manually manipulate
them. StaticNodeLists don't have this problem. Since they are not
live, manipulation of them should not be a problem. This means array
functionality such as sort, push, pop
On May 30, 2006, at 15:55, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Jonas Sicking wrote:
What we could maybe do though is to return a real ECMAScript array. I
actually like this idea a lot since that'll integrate much better
with
scripts than a StaticNodeList would.
That makes a lot of
Robin Berjon wrote:
On May 30, 2006, at 15:55, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Jonas Sicking wrote:
What we could maybe do though is to return a real ECMAScript array. I
actually like this idea a lot since that'll integrate much better with
scripts than a StaticNodeList would.
That
On Wed, 17 May 2006 15:35:24 +0200, Jim Ley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The shortest name should represent the most efficient method imho.
Crazy notion, names should be clear, not short for efficiency.
The point was that if the more efficient one of the two actually had a
longer name,
On Wed, 17 May 2006 06:29:54 +0200, liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Several people have raised issues with naming the methods match and
matchAll as those might suggest a boolean return value. Alternate
suggestions
have been select and selectAll.
For ECMAScript, I think match is a
On Wed, 17 May 2006 15:19:46 +0200, Lachlan Hunt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like match() too because it's much shorter than
getElementsBySelector(),
Right... :-)
but I think the fact that it only returns a single node is confusing and
that, in most cases, authors would want the whole
On Mon, 15 May 2006 01:22:21 +0200, liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just have a look at the XPathNSResolver interface.
In the Selectors spec, the selector elm is equivalent to *|elm in
the case of a missing default namespace, but ns|elm where ns is
the default namespace if a default
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:45:21 +0100, Jim Ley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fair enough, here are the requirements for the name:
* short
* simple
Why are these requirements for the name, no other DOM names are short
and simple, they're clear and unambiguous, I'd say they were the
requirements.
On Sat, 13 May 2006 05:49:45 +0200, liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've written some commentary on the Selectors API draft on WebGraphics.
uri:http://web-graphics.com/2006/05/12/javascript-and-selectors/
1. I'm aware how selectors work in browsers and that that's different from
how
On Sat, 13 May 2006 21:08:26 +0200, liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do think you're unnecessarily limiting the use of the Selectors API
in the current draft by only allowing selector matching on the subtree
of the document node though. The same way you might want to use
getElementsByTagName
On 13/05/06, Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 13 May 2006 21:08:26 +0200, liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And StaticNodeList looks to me to be pretty array-like.
Well, if StaticNodeList looks that way NodeList would look that way too
and I'd therefore suggest raising that
I've written some commentary on the Selectors API draft on WebGraphics.
uri:http://web-graphics.com/2006/05/12/javascript-and-selectors/
--
David liorean Andersson
uri:http://liorean.web-graphics.com/
15 matches
Mail list logo
