BONDI Candidate Release 1.0 - open for public comment until 9th of March 2009

2009-02-26 Thread David Rogers
Dear all, As discussed in the Widgets F2F in Paris, please find the links to the OMTP BONDI Candidate Release 1.0 documentation as follows. This is open for public comment at the moment until the 9th of March 2009 and can be downloaded from the BONDI site [1]: 1) BONDI Architecture

Re: [xhr2] Redirect during send question

2009-02-26 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:34:19 +0900, David Levin le...@chromium.org wrote: Just to round out the thread :), I fixed my test for IE and found that IE7 also throws an exception in this case. So all is good, right? :-) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/

Re: Minutes Re: DOM3 Events call today/tonight

2009-02-26 Thread Robin Berjon
On Feb 25, 2009, at 21:14 , Charles McCathieNevile wrote: Mutation events are proposed for next week Are these still as contentious as they used to be? If so, splitting them out into their own spec might make sense. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ Feel like hiring me? Go to

Re: ACTION-315: Widget URI scheme thoughts

2009-02-26 Thread Thomas Roessler
As a follow-up from trashing this through with Josh, the one open issue is navigation of iframes: Assume a widget frames a resource that is retrieved from the Web. Would navigation of that iframe have to go through the manifest based indirection or not? The sense in our conversation was

Re: ACTION-315: Widget URI scheme thoughts

2009-02-26 Thread Jon Ferraiolo
My opinion is that having a widget URI scheme is not worth all of this complexity. I propose that the W3C ship Widgets 1.0 as quickly as possible with less flexibility on URI addressing. I think it is acceptable for a 1.0 release if all assets in the ZIP can only be addressed by relative

Re: ACTION-315: Widget URI scheme thoughts

2009-02-26 Thread Thomas Roessler
Jon,I was proposing to *not* have a widget URI scheme, and outlining how to make that work. Note that, since we're talking about DOM-based technology, both the origin and the base URI are actually important properties to consider.Regards, --Thomas Roessler, W3C t...@w3.org On 26 Feb 2009, at

WebApps WG the OMTP Turin Rules are now Public

2009-02-26 Thread Arthur Barstow
The so-called OMTP Turin Rules can be downloaded from WebApps' wiki: http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/images/8/8b/BONDI-W3C-IPR- Turin-Rules-v04.pdf -Regards, Art Barstow On Feb 23, 2009, at 4:32 AM, ext Engel-Flechsig wrote: Dear Art, Please find below the (revised) version 04 of the

[widgets] Minutes from 26 February 2009 Widgets F2F Meeting

2009-02-26 Thread Arthur Barstow
The minutes from the February 26 Widgets f2f meeting are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2009/02/26-wam-minutes.html WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before 5 March 2009 (the next

[widgets] Minutes from 25 February 2009 Widgets F2F Meeting

2009-02-26 Thread Arthur Barstow
The minutes from the February 25 Widgets f2f meeting are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-wam-minutes.html WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before 5 March 2009 (the next

[widgets] Minutes from 24 February 2009 Widgets F2F Meeting

2009-02-26 Thread Arthur Barstow
The minutes from the February 24 Widgets f2f meeting are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2009/02/24-wam-minutes.html WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before 5 March 2009 (the next

Widget Requirement 37 (URI scheme etc)

2009-02-26 Thread Thomas Roessler
Marcos, R37 currently reads: A conforming specification MUST recommend that, at runtime, the addressing scheme used by a resource that addresses another resource within a widget package be resolved to some hierarchical URI scheme for the purpose of DOM normalization. A conforming

RE: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec

2009-02-26 Thread Travis Leithead
I went through the test results in IE8 just to see what the breakdown was and thought I'd pass this info along. I appreciate the thoroughness of these tests, though it bothers me a bit that we get hammered because of the various WebIDL binding issues (e.g., IE8's exception can't be mapped to

Re: [selectors-api] Test Suite Analysis (was: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec)

2009-02-26 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Travis Leithead wrote: I went through the test results in IE8 just to see what the breakdown was and thought I'd pass this info along. Thanks for this analysis, it's very informative. 1 - Actual Selectors API bugs 288

fyi: W3C XML Security Specifications announcement

2009-02-26 Thread Nokia-CIC/Boston
Signature Syntax and Processing Version 1.1 http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-xmldsig-core1-20090226/ (2) XML Encryption Syntax and Processing Version 1.1 http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-xmlenc-core1-20090226/ (3) XML Signature Transform Simplification: Requirements and Design http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD

[widgets] slides from Scott's presentation

2009-02-26 Thread Scott Wilson
Hi everyone, Here are the images I showed at the F2F in Paris: http://www.slideshare.net/scottw/widgets-and-wookies Cheers, Scott /-/-/-/-/-/ Scott Wilson Assistant Director, JISC CETIS University of Bolton scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com http://www.cetis.ac.uk/members/scott smime.p7s