[Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model

2010-11-19 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11348 Summary: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug 11349] New: [IndexedDB] Null should not be a valid key type

2010-11-19 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11349 Summary: [IndexedDB] Null should not be a valid key type Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug 11350] New: [IndexedDB] ObjectStores should have a way to hint that they're evictable

2010-11-19 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11350 Summary: [IndexedDB] ObjectStores should have a way to hint that they're evictable Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status:

[Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)?

2010-11-19 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11351 Summary: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)? Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW

Re: [Bug 11350] New: [IndexedDB] ObjectStores should have a way to hint that they're evictable

2010-11-19 Thread Jeremy Orlow
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:05 PM, bugzi...@jessica.w3.org wrote: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11350 Summary: [IndexedDB] ObjectStores should have a way to hint that they're evictable Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified

Last Call of WOFF File Format 1.0; comment deadline December 14

2010-11-19 Thread Arthur Barstow
Earlier this week, the Web Fonts WG published a LCWD of WOFF File Format 1.0 and Chris Lilley suggested WebApps review this spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-WOFF-20101116/ This LC has a normative reference to CORS and and a normative requirement for the spec's UAs re CORS: [[

Re: requestAnimationFrame

2010-11-19 Thread Darin Fisher
How about just running the callback once the tab becomes visible again? It will run, but just not unless there is reason to animate/paint. -Darin On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Robert O'Callahan rob...@ocallahan.orgwrote: I suppose we could have a variant API that explicitly means I don't

Re: requestAnimationFrame

2010-11-19 Thread Bjoern Hoehrmann
* Ojan Vafai wrote: On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote: Darin Fisher: I can imagine a situation where you have an animation that goes for, say, 10 seconds, and once the animation finishes something else happens. The 1 second maximum period seems useful in

Re: requestAnimationFrame

2010-11-19 Thread Bjoern Hoehrmann
* Robert O'Callahan wrote: Those are good goals, except I think we need to drill down into (c). Are people changing stuff at 15Hz for crude performance tuning, or for some other reason? There are many kinds of animations where you cannot easily interpolate between frames, so drawing in Ones

RE: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)?

2010-11-19 Thread Pablo Castro
-Original Message- From: public-webapps-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of bugzi...@jessica.w3.org Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 4:16 AM Just looking at this list, I guess I'm leaning towards _not_ limiting the maximum key size and instead pushing it

Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)?

2010-11-19 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann derhoe...@gmx.net wrote: * Pablo Castro wrote: Just looking at this list, I guess I'm leaning towards _not_ limiting the maximum key size and instead pushing it onto implementations to do the hard work here.  If so, we should probably have some

Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)?

2010-11-19 Thread Bjoern Hoehrmann
* Jonas Sicking wrote: The question is in part where the limit for ridiculous goes. 1K keys are sort of ridiculous, though I'm sure it happens. By ridiculous I mean that common systems would run out of memory. That is different among systems, and I would expect developers to consider it up to an

Re: requestAnimationFrame

2010-11-19 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann derhoe...@gmx.net wrote: Obviously that does not address your question, since couldn't never applies here, you could always just use setTimeout and setInterval and burn cycles, or whatever else gurantees your script runs even when the tab is