On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Arun Ranganathan a...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 9/7/10 10:08 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Kenneth Russell k...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Jian Li wrote:
Hi,
Several specs,
On 9/7/10 10:08 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Kenneth Russell k...@google.com
mailto:k...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org
mailto:nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Jian Li wrote:
Hi,
Several specs, like
Yes, we only need to add it to BlobBuilder so that it can be applied to both
FileReader, XHR.send and any other place that take the blob.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Eric Uhrhane er...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Jian Li jia...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
Several
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:09:13 +0200, Jian Li jia...@chromium.org wrote:
Several specs, like File API and WebGL, use ArrayBuffer, while other
spec, like XMLHttpRequest Level 2, use ByteArray. Should we change to
use the same name all across our specs? Since we define ArrayBuffer in
the Typed
On Sep 8, 2010, at 12:13 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:09:13 +0200, Jian Li jia...@chromium.org wrote:
Several specs, like File API and WebGL, use ArrayBuffer, while other spec,
like XMLHttpRequest Level 2, use ByteArray. Should we change to use the same
name all
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:22:44 +0200, Chris Marrin cmar...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 8, 2010, at 12:13 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:09:13 +0200, Jian Li jia...@chromium.org wrote:
Several specs, like File API and WebGL, use ArrayBuffer, while other
spec, like
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Jian Li jia...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
Several specs, like File API and WebGL, use ArrayBuffer, while other spec,
like XMLHttpRequest Level 2, use ByteArray. Should we change to use the same
name all across our specs? Since we define ArrayBuffer in the Typed
On Sep 8, 2010, at 9:44 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:22:44 +0200, Chris Marrin cmar...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 8, 2010, at 12:13 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:09:13 +0200, Jian Li jia...@chromium.org wrote:
Several specs, like File API and
On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:13:19 +0200, Chris Marrin cmar...@apple.com wrote:
ArrayBuffer certainly has momentum behind it. It started as a part of
the WebGL spec as a way of passing buffers of data of various types
(sometimes heterogeneous types) to the WebGL engine. Since then, it
has found
On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
Web Sockets is certainly another candidate, but I meant Web Workers. There
have been informal discussions on using ArrayBuffers as a way to safely share
binary data between threads. I don't believe anything has been formalized
here.
You
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Oliver Hunt oli...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
Web Sockets is certainly another candidate, but I meant Web Workers. There
have been informal discussions on using ArrayBuffers as a way to safely
share binary data between
On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
Web Sockets is certainly another candidate, but I meant Web Workers. There
have been informal discussions on using ArrayBuffers as a way to safely
share binary data between threads. I don't
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Chris Marrin cmar...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
Web Sockets is certainly another candidate, but I meant Web Workers.
There have been informal discussions on using
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:37 AM, Chris Marrin cmar...@apple.com wrote:
On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:13 AM, Chris Marrin wrote:
Web Sockets is certainly another
Hi,
Several specs, like File API and WebGL, use ArrayBuffer, while other spec,
like XMLHttpRequest Level 2, use ByteArray. Should we change to use the same
name all across our specs? Since we define ArrayBuffer in the Typed Arrays
spec (
Jian Li wrote:
Hi,
Several specs, like File API and WebGL, use ArrayBuffer, while other spec,
like XMLHttpRequest Level 2, use ByteArray. Should we change to use the same
name all across our specs? Since we define ArrayBuffer in the Typed Arrays
spec (
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Jian Li wrote:
Hi,
Several specs, like File API and WebGL, use ArrayBuffer, while other spec,
like XMLHttpRequest Level 2, use ByteArray. Should we change to use the
same
name all across our specs? Since we define ArrayBuffer
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Kenneth Russell k...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Jian Li wrote:
Hi,
Several specs, like File API and WebGL, use ArrayBuffer, while other
spec,
like XMLHttpRequest Level 2, use ByteArray. Should we
18 matches
Mail list logo
