On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:22:37 +0100, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org
wrote:
Why couldn't FormData.append(Blob) provide optional parameters to allow
the caller to specify the name and type?
Why wouldn't you provide a File object instead then? It seems a lot of use
cases here and elsewhere
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:22:37 +0100, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org
wrote:
Why couldn't FormData.append(Blob) provide optional parameters to allow
the caller to specify the name and type?
Why wouldn't you provide a
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:26:32 +0100, Jian Li jia...@google.com wrote:
To be safe, probably UA can choose to create the unique name from the
GUID, like blob-5597cb2e-74fb-479a-81e8-10679c523118.
Which GUID? Is that in the File API specification?
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
I mean UUID. It is the UUID part in URN of the File API spec. The UA can
choose any appropriate way to generate a unique string, like UUID.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:26:32 +0100, Jian Li jia...@google.com wrote:
To be
Unless we want to treat the blob same as string, we might have to provider
some sort of filename. Since without it, the server side might have problem
to save it temporarily.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:24:52 +0100, Dmitry
Why couldn't FormData.append(Blob) provide optional parameters to allow the
caller to specify the name and type?
-Darin
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:24:52 +0100, Dmitry Titov dim...@google.com
wrote:
Seriously though, it
What about using a filename that is unique with repect to files sent in that
FormData (but it is up to the UA)? For example, a UA may choose to do Blob1,
Blob2, etc. For the content-type, application/octet-string seems most
fitting.
Here's the result applied to your example:
To be safe, probably UA can choose to create the unique name from the GUID,
like blob-5597cb2e-74fb-479a-81e8-10679c523118.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:43 PM, David Levin le...@google.com wrote:
What about using a filename that is unique with repect to files sent in
that FormData (but it is up
To be even safer, I'd remove dashes from it... I never knew why GUIDs have
those dashes - to make them easier to memorize? :-)
Seriously though, it would be nice to have XHR2 spec to have these details
spelled out, especially mime type (I think David meant
application/octet-stream)
Dmitry
On
