Thank you for your responses to our comments. The PFWG formally accepts
your disposition of these issues. There is some discussion inline below
as input into requirements for future versions of the spec.
Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Michael Coopercoo...@w3.org wrote:
On Oct 7, 2009, at 1:57 PM, ext Michael Cooper wrote:
Thank you for your responses to our comments. The PFWG formally
accepts your disposition of these issues. There is some discussion
inline below as input into requirements for future versions of the
spec.
I added a pointer to this
Hi Michael,
WebApps is awaiting on a response from WAI before we republish the
Widgets PC specification.
FYI, as I alluded to in my previous email (below), we have created a
new document for conformance checkers:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-pc-cc
Again, I would be happy to collaborate
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Michael Coopercoo...@w3.org wrote:
This is a review of Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-widgets-20090528/, the Last Call Working
Draft. These comments are submitted on behalf of the Protocols and Formats
Working Group and
This is a review of Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-widgets-20090528/, the Last Call Working
Draft. These comments are submitted on behalf of the Protocols and
Formats Working Group and are focused on accessibility to people with
disabilities.
We apologize
