On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Nov 8, 2009, at 11:12 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
-Regards, Art Barstow
[1] http://www.w3.org/2009/11/02-webapps-minutes.html#item12
[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0477.html
From a
On Nov 8, 2009, at 11:12 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
-Regards, Art Barstow
[1] http://www.w3.org/2009/11/02-webapps-minutes.html#item12
[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0477.html
From a technical point of view, are we expecting that there will
actually be
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
On Nov 8, 2009, at 11:12 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Indeed. I still personally wouldn't call it multiple independent
implementations though.
Would you call multiple implementations that use the standard C library
On Nov 9, 2009, at 3:12 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com
wrote:
On Nov 8, 2009, at 11:12 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Indeed. I still personally wouldn't call it multiple independent
implementations though.
Would you call multiple
On Nov 9, 2009, at 09:58 , Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Nov 8, 2009, at 11:12 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Indeed. I still personally wouldn't call it multiple independent
implementations though.
Would you call multiple implementations that use the standard C
library independent? Obviously
On Nov 9, 2009, at 3:49 AM, Robin Berjon wrote:
On Nov 9, 2009, at 09:58 , Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Nov 8, 2009, at 11:12 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Indeed. I still personally wouldn't call it multiple independent
implementations though.
Would you call multiple implementations that use
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
If that were the extent of the implementation, I might agree. However, that
doesn't accurately characterize at least WebKit's WebDatabase
implementation. WebKit has around 15k lines of code which implement
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote:
I agree that your Gecko example would be questionable. But to give an
example on the other side of the fence, WebKit uses a copy of Mozilla's
image decoding code, and yet I think our implementation of the img element
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:44:09 -0800, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com
wrote:
At the Web Apps WG face-to-face meeting at TPAC, all parties agreed (in
the room at least) to let the spec continue without fully specifying the
SQL dialect.
This is not at all the sense that I got. Hixie agreed
On Nov 9, 2009, at 12:58 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
I think the likely outcome of the current situation will be that
new mobile
browsers will have a harder time establishing themselves in the
market,
since many popular mobile web apps will be using a database
technology where
the
On Nov 7, 2009, at 3:53 PM, ext Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
The draft minutes are included at
http://www.w3.org/2009/11/02-webapps-minutes.html starting from the
WebIDL
Thanks for the summaries Chaals!
Offline storage / databases
The SQL-based Web Database proposal will probably not
On Nov 8, 2009, at 12:43 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Arthur Barstow
art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
On Nov 7, 2009, at 3:53 PM, ext Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
The draft minutes are included at
http://www.w3.org/2009/11/02-webapps-minutes.html starting from
-Regards, Art Barstow
[1] http://www.w3.org/2009/11/02-webapps-minutes.html#item12
[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0477.html
From a technical point of view, are we expecting that there will
actually be multiple independent interoperable implementations?
13 matches
Mail list logo
