On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Marcos Caceres wrote:
If you think it is possible to have read only Storage values, naturally
we would need some kind of access violation exception to be thrown when
someone tries to change a read only value...
Sure. For each Storage object that isn't sessionStorage or
This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish the First Public
Working Draft of the specs below.
As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and
encouraged and silence will be assumed to be assent. The deadline for
comments is April 10.
-Regards, Art Barstow
Begin forwarded
Nokia supports the publication of these FPWDs. -Regards, Art Barstow
On Apr 2, 2009, at 3:59 PM, Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote:
This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish the First Public
Working Draft of the specs below.
As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and
Ian Hickson wrote on 1/14/2009 4:07 PM:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Jonas Sicking wrote:
It's not just POST that we need to worry about, ideally we should
cover the GET case as well. Or at
