On 12/10/11 3:26 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Sean Hoganshogu...@westnet.com.au wrote:
On 24/09/11 7:16 AM, Adam Klein wrote:
- Is free of the faults of the existing Mutation Events mechanism
(enumerated in detail here:
On 10/12/2011 02:00 PM, Sean Hogan wrote:
On 12/10/11 3:26 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Sean Hoganshogu...@westnet.com.au
wrote:
On 24/09/11 7:16 AM, Adam Klein wrote:
- Is free of the faults of the existing Mutation Events mechanism
(enumerated in detail here:
Hi Sean,
I find it hard to reason about cases in the abstract. None of the
examples you list seem concerning to me (i.e. I believe they can be
properly handled), but perhaps it's a failure of my imagination.
Maybe you can provide concrete examples (i.e. with code snippets,
actual instances of
Currently IDBObjectStore.count/get/openCursor and
IDBIndex.count/get/openCursor/openKeyCursor all take a key or a
KeyRange. However IDBObjectStore.delete only accepts keys. We should
fix this to allow .delete to accept a KeyRange as well.
/ Jonas
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14441
Summary: Note in IDBIndex.getKey is incorrect
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
If a db connection is closed inside the onupgradeneeded handler, section 4.1
step #8 states that we should return an ABORT_ERR and abort steps. This implies
that the transaction should fail. Since today, the db is closed after all
requests have been processed, we don't see the reason why we
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
If a db connection is closed inside the onupgradeneeded handler, section 4.1
step #8 states that we should return an ABORT_ERR and abort steps. This
implies that the transaction should fail. Since today, the db is
On Wednesday, October 12, 2011 4:21 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
If a db connection is closed inside the onupgradeneeded handler, section 4.1
step #8 states that we should return an ABORT_ERR and abort steps. This
Hi Anne,
Talking with Doug this morning, it seems he didn't have a chance to reply to
your mail below since he's been pretty busy. I've provided responses below
inline, sorry for the delay!
Thanks,
Jacob
-Original Message-
From: Anne van Kesteren [mailto:ann...@opera.com]
Sent:
Ms2ger,
Thanks for all your suggestions on DOM3Events. There's some good grammatical
fix ups that you suggest. These shouldn't affect implementers, but Doug and I
can integrate these suggestions to improve the readability.
As for the functional comments:
4.3 Interface EventTarget
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 09:54:26 +0900, Jacob Rossi
jacob.ro...@microsoft.com wrote:
Talking with Doug this morning, it seems he didn't have a chance to
reply to your mail below since he's been pretty busy. I've provided
responses below inline, sorry for the delay!
Thanks for getting to them.
-Original Message-
From: Anne van Kesteren [mailto:ann...@opera.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 6:27 PM
To: Doug Schepers; Jacob Rossi
Cc: public-webapps; Adrian Bateman; Arthur Barstow; Chaals McCathieNevile;
www-...@w3.org
Subject: Re: [DOM3Events] Oustanding issues (was:
On 13/10/11 12:34 AM, Olli Pettay wrote:
On 10/12/2011 02:00 PM, Sean Hogan wrote:
On 12/10/11 3:26 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Sean Hoganshogu...@westnet.com.au
wrote:
On 24/09/11 7:16 AM, Adam Klein wrote:
- Is free of the faults of the existing Mutation
On 13/10/11 4:50 AM, Rafael Weinstein wrote:
Hi Sean,
I find it hard to reason about cases in the abstract. None of the
examples you list seem concerning to me (i.e. I believe they can be
properly handled), but perhaps it's a failure of my imagination.
I didn't say they can't be properly
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Sean Hogan shogu...@westnet.com.au wrote:
Maybe you can provide concrete examples (i.e. with code snippets,
actual instances of use cases, etc...)
Actually, it is the proponents of changing the status-quo and of the more
complex solution who bear more
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:32:34 +0900, Jacob Rossi
jacob.ro...@microsoft.com wrote:
Your welcome, I appreciate your tolerance! I made a sweep in good faith
through the list archives and was unable to find other unanswered issues.
It is somewhat sad comments are not being tracked. I just went
16 matches
Mail list logo