On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 03:19:26 +0200, Jacob Rossi
jacob.ro...@microsoft.com wrote:
Note: For programming languages which do not allow optional method
parameters, such as Java, the implementation may provide two
EventTarget.addEventListener methods, one with 2 parameters, and one
with 3
On Wednesday, October 12, 2011, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
On Wednesday, October 12, 2011 4:21 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
If a db connection is closed inside the onupgradeneeded handler,
section 4.1
On 13/10/11 2:33 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Sean Hogan shogu...@westnet.com.au
mailto:shogu...@westnet.com.au wrote:
Maybe you can provide concrete examples (i.e. with code snippets,
actual instances of use cases, etc...)
Actually, it is the
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Sean Hogan shogu...@westnet.com.au wrote:
It is different to event listeners. The following
document.body.**addEventListener(**DOMAttrModified, handler, false);
document.getElementById(**target).addEventListener(**DOMAttrModified,
preferred_handler,
On 13/10/11 7:58 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Sean Hogan shogu...@westnet.com.au
mailto:shogu...@westnet.com.au wrote:
Why do you assume that all other mutation observers should ignore
such changes? If there's a library that's automatically syncing
On 10/13/2011 05:51 AM, Sean Hogan wrote:
My main reservation towards the proposal is its complexity - it promises
a lot and I will be surprised if it is as trivial to implement as you
have implied. Even then, I'm expecting that it isn't the improvement
(over the status-quo) that everyone is
On 10/13/2011 11:32 AM, Sean Hogan wrote:
On 13/10/11 2:33 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Sean Hogan shogu...@westnet.com.au
mailto:shogu...@westnet.com.au wrote:
Maybe you can provide concrete examples (i.e. with code snippets,
actual instances of use
Although the bug list for Web Storage is back to zero, rev 1.182 [1]
which replaces the initXXXEvent method with a constructor (ala DOM4)
requires a new LC. As such, this a Call for Consensus to publish a new
LCWD of this spec:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/
The Process Document states
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:33:40 +0900, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:32:34 +0900, Jacob Rossi
jacob.ro...@microsoft.com wrote:
Your welcome, I appreciate your tolerance! I made a sweep in good faith
through the list archives and was unable to find other
On Monday, October 10, 2011 10:10 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
On Tuesday, October 04, 2011 3:01 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at
On Thursday, October 13, 2011 12:15 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Wednesday, October 12, 2011, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
On Wednesday, October 12, 2011 4:21 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
If a db connection
On 8/31/11 3:49 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
This model should be rephrased a bit to make it more clear what the
requirements are. E.g. I think if you use POST it should not be a MAY
but a MUST that 500 is returned.
Also what are the security errors you can get a 500 for? Are they not
On 8/31/11 4:43 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 06:12:06 +0200, Arun Ranganathan
a...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 8/14/11 5:36 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
I think FileList should talk less about selected files and more
about being a collection or list of File objects. That way it
On 8/31/11 4:39 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 06:20:58 +0200, Arun Ranganathan
a...@mozilla.com wrote:
Done.
Thanks!
I noticed a few small things:
* HTML5 should be without space
* Progress Events is pointing to a dated version rather than the
latest; Charles is also
On 8/31/11 4:48 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
It's defined as a single algorithm:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/#dfn-slice
and cribs from ECMAScript's definition of slice. It's the only host
object with a slice.
It still looks like several independent algorithms to me. There should
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
On Thursday, October 13, 2011 12:15 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Wednesday, October 12, 2011, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
On Wednesday, October 12, 2011 4:21 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
My question was not about the undo command. I meant that if I
implemented
a
17 matches
Mail list logo
