Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] alsa sink latency - how to account for startup delay

2016-03-28 Thread Georg Chini
On 29.03.2016 02:13, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: On 3/28/16 12:38 PM, Georg Chini wrote: On 28.03.2016 17:18, Georg Chini wrote: On 28.03.2016 16:16, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: On 3/22/16 4:11 AM, Georg Chini wrote: Hi, Ups, looks like I misread your sentence above. You are right, in

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] alsa sink latency - how to account for startup delay

2016-03-28 Thread Pierre-Louis Bossart
On 3/28/16 12:38 PM, Georg Chini wrote: On 28.03.2016 17:18, Georg Chini wrote: On 28.03.2016 16:16, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: On 3/22/16 4:11 AM, Georg Chini wrote: Hi, Sorry I missed this thread last week. At the risk of being pedantic, maybe you should consider two different concepts.

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Stepping down; future thoughts

2016-03-28 Thread Ahmed S. Darwish
Hi David :-) On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 06:36:30AM +0200, David Henningsson wrote: > I've decided to stop working for Canonical, and with that, I intend to ramp > down my contributions to PulseAudio, on both upstream and Ubuntu levels. > As a user, I send my gratitude for all of your work for a

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Latency problem with long latencies

2016-03-28 Thread Georg Chini
On 28.03.2016 16:45, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: On 3/28/16 9:30 AM, Georg Chini wrote: On 28.03.2016 16:27, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: On 3/20/16 2:24 PM, Georg Chini wrote: On 20.03.2016 19:13, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: 20.03.2016 22:41, Georg Chini пишет: Hello, I am still working

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] alsa sink latency - how to account for startup delay

2016-03-28 Thread Georg Chini
On 28.03.2016 16:16, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: On 3/22/16 4:11 AM, Georg Chini wrote: Hi, when a sink is started, there is some delay before the first sample is really played. This delay is a constant part of the sink latency that will be always present, so the minimum sink latency cannot go

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Latency problem with long latencies

2016-03-28 Thread Georg Chini
On 28.03.2016 16:27, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: On 3/20/16 2:24 PM, Georg Chini wrote: On 20.03.2016 19:13, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: 20.03.2016 22:41, Georg Chini пишет: Hello, I am still working on module-loopback and hit a problem that I cannot explain. When running a HDA card with

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Latency problem with long latencies

2016-03-28 Thread Pierre-Louis Bossart
On 3/20/16 2:24 PM, Georg Chini wrote: On 20.03.2016 19:13, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: 20.03.2016 22:41, Georg Chini пишет: Hello, I am still working on module-loopback and hit a problem that I cannot explain. When running a HDA card with long latency (333ms) I see that the resulting

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] alsa sink latency - how to account for startup delay

2016-03-28 Thread Pierre-Louis Bossart
On 3/22/16 4:11 AM, Georg Chini wrote: Hi, when a sink is started, there is some delay before the first sample is really played. This delay is a constant part of the sink latency that will be always present, so the minimum sink latency cannot go below that start delay. Would it be acceptable to

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH v3 00/11] Introduce memfd support

2016-03-28 Thread Sjoerd Simons
On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 11:24 +0500, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > [readding the list] > 22.03.2016 05:56, Ahmed S. Darwish пишет: > > > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:01:14AM +0100, David Henningsson wrote: > > > > Alexander mentioned the SteamOS case, where "they don't link > > statically, but

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Rethinking how we do reviews

2016-03-28 Thread Nazar Mokrynskyi
Where does this review happens? Is it possible to put code somewhere like GitHub/BitBucket/GitLab, so that other people can comment conveniently, because mailing list is kind of weird (personal opinion) in 2016. I'm participating in other projects, and GitHub (even mirror just for PRs and

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Stepping down; future thoughts

2016-03-28 Thread David Henningsson
On 2016-03-28 08:55, Arun Raghavan wrote: Hi David, On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 06:36 +0200, David Henningsson wrote: I've decided to stop working for Canonical, and with that, I intend to ramp down my contributions to PulseAudio, on both upstream and Ubuntu levels. I could have stayed as a

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Rethinking how we do reviews

2016-03-28 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
28.03.2016 12:13, Arun Raghavan wrote: Our current way of doing things is good for keeping up code quality, but I think over time, with such a large patch backlog, we end up spending more and more time performing reviews, and less and less time working on features. This becomes quite draining

[pulseaudio-discuss] Rethinking how we do reviews

2016-03-28 Thread Arun Raghavan
Hello, I'm sure it's not shocking or surprising to state that our patch review bandwidth is significantly lower than the rate at which contributions are coming in. It is also quite demotivating to send patches to the list and have to wait weeks to hear about them, and kudos to all our patient

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Stepping down; future thoughts

2016-03-28 Thread Arun Raghavan
Hi David, On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 06:36 +0200, David Henningsson wrote: > I've decided to stop working for Canonical, and with that, I intend to  > ramp down my contributions to PulseAudio, on both upstream and Ubuntu  > levels. > > I could have stayed as a volunteer, but in fact I've been a bit