Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
ma, 2010-01-04 kello 09:37 +, Colin Guthrie kirjoitti: As for the next stage I'm not an expert on this but I think you can try adding: [Element IEC985 Optical Raw] switch = mute switch = mute makes the mixer element state follow pulseaudio's sink mute state, and I don't think you meant

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Tanu Kaskinen at 04/01/10 14:26 did gyre and gimble: ma, 2010-01-04 kello 09:37 +, Colin Guthrie kirjoitti: As for the next stage I'm not an expert on this but I think you can try adding: [Element IEC985 Optical Raw] switch = mute switch = mute makes the mixer

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Daniel Chen at 04/01/10 15:04 did gyre and gimble: On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Tanu Kaskinen ta...@iki.fi wrote: switch = mute makes the mixer element state follow pulseaudio's sink mute state, and I don't think you meant to do that. Use switch = off to set the element

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 04/01/10 15:33 did gyre and gimble: 'Twas brillig, and Daniel Chen at 04/01/10 15:04 did gyre and gimble: On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Tanu Kaskinen ta...@iki.fi wrote: switch = mute makes the mixer element state follow pulseaudio's sink mute state, and I

[pulseaudio-discuss] Help needed for system-wide pulseaudio for blind users

2010-01-04 Thread Bill Cox
I'm trying to build a Vinux (blind-user Linux distro) release based on Ubuntu/Lucid. There's too much code to rewrite to have everything working the right way with pulseaudio by May, so I want to release Vinux/Ubuntu Lucid with the system-wide hack. I've enabled PA to start in system wide mode

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Help needed for system-wide pulseaudio for blind users

2010-01-04 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 11:02 -0500, Bill Cox wrote: I'm trying to build a Vinux (blind-user Linux distro) release based on Ubuntu/Lucid. There's too much code to rewrite to have everything working the right way with pulseaudio by May, so I want to release Vinux/Ubuntu Lucid with the

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Help needed for system-wide pulseaudio for blind users

2010-01-04 Thread Bill Cox
Yes, it's running as user 'pulse' like this: /usr/bin/pulseaudio --system --daemonize --high-priority --log-target=syslog --disallow-module-loading=1 Bill On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 11:02 -0500, Bill Cox wrote: I'm trying to build

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Help needed for system-wide pulseaudio for blind users

2010-01-04 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
ma, 2010-01-04 kello 11:02 -0500, Bill Cox kirjoitti: I'm trying to build a Vinux (blind-user Linux distro) release based on Ubuntu/Lucid. There's too much code to rewrite to have everything working the right way with pulseaudio by May, so I want to release Vinux/Ubuntu Lucid with the

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Help needed for system-wide pulseaudio for blind users

2010-01-04 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Tanu Kaskinen at 04/01/10 16:27 did gyre and gimble: I wonder if the audio device permission rewriting should be disabled somehow before the system-wide daemon works properly. The current symptoms don't sound like you've hit this issue yet, but I would think that the

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Help needed for system-wide pulseaudio for blind users

2010-01-04 Thread Daniel Chen
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Bill Cox waywardg...@gmail.com wrote: Pulseaudio starts, and speech-dispatcher and speechd-up work with it just fine at boot.  Since this is a distro for the blind, I boot into Err, are you sure that speech* are actually using PA and not ALSA directly? Your

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Daniel Chen
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie wrote: Actually is this safe to do - i.e. disabling it wholesale? Is it not used for digital output in some capacity (e.g. if the user picks a digital profile)? Or is it perfectly safe to just turn it off all the time? I don't

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Help needed for system-wide pulseaudio for blind users

2010-01-04 Thread Bill Cox
Wow! That's a lot of replies! Thanks, but the first reply was right. The problem was 100% my spaceyness, which unfortunately happens a lot. I had the system wide speech-dispatcher using alsa, not pulse. That probably locked the sound card somehow. When I set it to pulse, I get sound

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Help needed for system-wide pulseaudio for blind users

2010-01-04 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Daniel Chen at 04/01/10 16:56 did gyre and gimble: On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Bill Cox waywardg...@gmail.com wrote: Pulseaudio starts, and speech-dispatcher and speechd-up work with it just fine at boot. Since this is a distro for the blind, I boot into Err, are you

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Help needed for system-wide pulseaudio for blind users

2010-01-04 Thread Bill Cox
Ok! I've got both critical speech applications working great! Speakup reads all my consoles, and Orca reads Gnome apps. I removed gdm, and I log directly into a console, and when I type startx, I get a gnome desktop. I can't even tell you how excited I am to have speech finally working great in

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 01.01.10 22:25, Bill Cox (waywardg...@gmail.com) wrote: On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: I don't see why anyone would want to have audio when changing to root for admin purposes. Playing music certainly does not fall under admin

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 01.01.10 22:42, Bill Cox (waywardg...@gmail.com) wrote: On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: And this is the problem because it works with alsa, simply add every user you want to give audio access to the audio group and it worked.

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 01.01.10 23:13, Bill Cox (waywardg...@gmail.com) wrote: On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Halim Sahin at 23/12/09 13:24 did gyre and gimble: The Problem can be summarized in one sentence: Pulseaudio currently breaks

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 01.01.10 23:50, Bill Cox (waywardg...@gmail.com) wrote: On Fedora at least the screenreader runs as normal process in the gdm pseudo-session which also happens to run a PA instance. So everything should be fine here, and I am quite sure this is not only done on Fedora this way but

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 02.01.10 16:52, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote: I'm not quite sure how this works. When a speakup client wants access to the sound card, it could request access at high priority, and then plays it's sound. How would it hand back the sound card to the other user and

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Daniel Chen at 04/01/10 17:03 did gyre and gimble: On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie wrote: Actually is this safe to do - i.e. disabling it wholesale? Is it not used for digital output in some capacity (e.g. if the user picks a digital

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Bill Cox
Hi, Lennart. The blind run all sorts of GUI-driven applications like Synaptic, from the System/Administration menu. Howeve, Orca makes these applications accessible when things are working correctly. I agree that we don't want people to login through gdm as root. They do things like su to

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 04/01/10 19:06 did gyre and gimble: I agree. and that adding hooks to consolekit (if they don't exist) and the concept of an idle user are probably more practical long term solutions. idle user? By that you mean some pseudo user session that the

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 02.01.10 16:03, Bill Cox (waywardg...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi, Col. I'm willing to try the aproach you suggest, but I'd like to debate the implementation some more. If I understand correctly, I can use CK to determine whenever the sound card permissions are moved to a new user (which

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Bill Cox
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: I dont see why the speech tools should be handled in any way different from the other acessibility tools we ship: in that they are part of the session. While I am no accessibility expert I am kinda sure that on

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sun, 03.01.10 07:41, Bill Cox (waywardg...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi, Colin. I disagree that speech-dispatcher and speechd-up are broken and need to be fixed. speechd-up is a root daemon attached to the /dev/softsynth device. I see no utility in having multiple copies of it.

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sun, 03.01.10 12:29, Gene Heskett (gene.hesk...@gmail.com) wrote: So, in my simplistic and user-centric point-of-view, I wonder if speechd-up accepts audio INPUTS? Perhaps it could act as a pulseaudio sink, with the appropriate modules, of course. It starts before the user logs in and only

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Bill Cox at 04/01/10 19:43 did gyre and gimble: Colin and Luke have suggested using CK to deal with this, by killing off speech-dispatcher and speechd-up when the user logs in through gdm, and restarting it when they log out. Note that I wasn't really suggesting that it was

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sun, 03.01.10 21:26, Ng Oon-Ee (ngoo...@gmail.com) wrote: On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 07:41 -0500, Bill Cox wrote: Hi, Colin. I disagree that speech-dispatcher and speechd-up are broken and need to be fixed. speechd-up is a root daemon attached to the /dev/softsynth device. I see no

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Bill Cox
Hi, Lennart. I beg you to not work towards eliminating the consoles. Speakup is not only popular, but easily installed as a module in Ubuntu, with 'm-a a-i speakup-souce'. Even sighted users prefer to have those consoles available when X goes nuts, and for the blind, they need it whenever speech

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sun, 03.01.10 14:21, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Ng Oon-Ee at 03/01/10 13:26 did gyre and gimble: So, in my simplistic and user-centric point-of-view, I wonder if speechd-up accepts audio INPUTS? Perhaps it could act as a pulseaudio sink, with the

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Bill Cox
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: ... an alternative could be to fix speakup to simply watch CK and disable itself as long as long as somebody is logged in. Users need to be able to press Ctrl+Alt+F1 at any time and get to a speeking console. It

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sun, 03.01.10 16:34, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Bill Cox at 03/01/10 16:23 did gyre and gimble: Speechd-up isn't the only root level sound source that's out there. Espeakup is another alternative to speechd-up which is currently much more popular,

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Bill Cox at 04/01/10 20:01 did gyre and gimble: On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: ... an alternative could be to fix speakup to simply watch CK and disable itself as long as long as somebody is logged in. Users need to be

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Bill Cox
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: Also, the sepakup device access should be handled by udev-acl as well. That would probably require non-trivial patching in the speakup tts daemon though. I'm completely ignorant of udev-acl, but if this is the

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Markus Rechberger
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Sun, 03.01.10 07:41, Bill Cox (waywardg...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi, Colin.  I disagree that speech-dispatcher and speechd-up are broken and need to be fixed.  speechd-up is a root daemon attached to the

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 04.01.10 14:59, Bill Cox (waywardg...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi, Lennart. I beg you to not work towards eliminating the consoles. Speakup is not only popular, but easily installed as a module in Ubuntu, with 'm-a a-i speakup-souce'. It's not me who is setting the agenda here, its

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 04.01.10 19:36, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 04/01/10 19:06 did gyre and gimble: I agree. and that adding hooks to consolekit (if they don't exist) and the concept of an idle user are probably more practical long term

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 04.01.10 21:36, Markus Rechberger (mrechber...@gmail.com) wrote: Why do you second-guess us, but not them? In the long run device access for root wont work anyway, for example, when you acre about more than ALSA kernel devices, such as bluetooth or other stuff that might need

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 04.01.10 15:10, Bill Cox (waywardg...@gmail.com) wrote: On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: Also, the sepakup device access should be handled by udev-acl as well. That would probably require non-trivial patching in the speakup tts

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Bill Cox
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: Right. So why not fix orca and make everything work fine in Gnome? I mean, lets fix things properly, not carry on with kludges. I'm guessing you're and Emacs user. What's wrong with Vim? Why don't we simply

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 04.01.10 14:21, Bill Cox (waywardg...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi, Lennart. The blind run all sorts of GUI-driven applications like Synaptic, from the System/Administration menu. Howeve, Orca makes these applications accessible when things are working correctly. I agree that we don't

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Bill Cox
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: The problem of course is that the tts daemon needs to watch this too and not choke if the device access to that soft_synth device goes away. Ok, so I could modify both espeakup and speechd-up to use udev and deal

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 04.01.10 15:52, Bill Cox (waywardg...@gmail.com) wrote: On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: Right. So why not fix orca and make everything work fine in Gnome? I mean, lets fix things properly, not carry on with kludges. I'm guessing

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 04.01.10 15:58, Bill Cox (waywardg...@gmail.com) wrote: On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: The problem of course is that the tts daemon needs to watch this too and not choke if the device access to that soft_synth device goes away.

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 04.01.10 19:56, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Bill Cox at 04/01/10 19:43 did gyre and gimble: Colin and Luke have suggested using CK to deal with this, by killing off speech-dispatcher and speechd-up when the user logs in through gdm, and

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Does SBC support dynamically changing bit rates and frame lengths?

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sun, 03.01.10 03:27, Burkhard Stubert (burkhard.stub...@googlemail.com) wrote: Hi folks, I use my mobile phone as the source of an A2DP (Bluetooth) link and a Linux box as the sink of this link. The connection is successfully established and pulseaudio on the Linux box (sink) creates a

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] pacmd list-sink-inputs requested latency value

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 01.01.10 18:30, Cristian Morales Vega (cmorv...@yahoo.es) wrote: Hi, I'm trying to understand the output from pacmd. My problem is that pacmd list-sinks outputs: configured latency: 0,00 ms; range is 56,00 .. 371,52 ms (no client connected) And when running the test program from

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Using pulseaudio with speakup

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 01.01.10 16:58, Bill Cox (waywardg...@gmail.com) wrote: However, even with these changes, there are bugs due to pulseaudio's user-based structure. Today, in Karmic, if I 'switch user' to another use, my new gnome session has no sound. That's because there are two pulseaudio

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Is running as user smart or dumb?

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 31.12.09 21:52, Bill Cox (waywardg...@gmail.com) wrote: Since I didn't get much response with my more polite e-mail, here's what I really think, given my current ignorance about pulseaudio... PulseAudio is cool, but I fear it's over-engineered by some Ph.D's with too much elegance

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Is running as user smart or dumb?

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 04.01.10 23:05, Markus Rechberger (mrechber...@gmail.com) wrote: Please don't post FUD like this on this ML. If you want to spread FUD then I can tell you there are much better fora for that. Lennart, this is more likely your way to ignore user requests. What you need to

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Conditional up/down mixing

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 28.12.09 14:49, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote: Hi, I could have sworn this was asked about on the ML recently but perhaps it was just IRC as I cannot for the life of me find the message :s Anyway, someone was asking about their 5.1 capable card and how they would

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] asyncq.c: q overrun, queuing locally

2010-01-04 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 28.12.09 20:43, Chris (cpoll...@embarqmail.com) wrote: I noticed tonight that when I was copying a 1.2Gb file to my thumb drive that it took forever. From a suggestion in another list I ran in a terminal pulseaudio -k ; pulseaudio -. I've attached the output. One other thing of

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Bill Cox
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: If you feel the need to support multiple alternative solutions for the same problem and effectively double your maintainance work you are welcome to do so, but that's your choice, and hence it is *your* job to

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Bill Cox
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: They wouldn't have to link to udev at all. As mentioned they should simply use inotify() and access() to minitor devices access coming and going on /dev/soft_synth. Got it. That makes it clearer.

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Does SBC support dynamically changing bit rates and frame lengths?

2010-01-04 Thread Burkhard Stubert
2010/1/4 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net On Sun, 03.01.10 03:27, Burkhard Stubert (burkhard.stub...@googlemail.com) wrote: So, my question is: Does pulseaudio's SBC implementation support dynamically changing bit rates and frame lengths? If so, how and where? No, we don't

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Is running as user smart or dumb?

2010-01-04 Thread Bill Cox
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: Dude, if you as your questions on the ML while everyone is on christmas/new year holidays, you cannot expect immediate and comprehensive replies. Well, for that I apologize. If you want to see a socially

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 04 January 2010, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: ma, 2010-01-04 kello 09:37 +, Colin Guthrie kirjoitti: As for the next stage I'm not an expert on this but I think you can try adding: [Element IEC985 Optical Raw] switch = mute switch = mute makes the mixer element state follow

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Conditional up/down mixing

2010-01-04 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 04/01/10 22:48 did gyre and gimble: On Mon, 28.12.09 14:49, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote: Hi, I could have sworn this was asked about on the ML recently but perhaps it was just IRC as I cannot for the life of me find the message :s

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Accessing audio as root

2010-01-04 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 04/01/10 20:39 did gyre and gimble: On Mon, 04.01.10 19:36, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 04/01/10 19:06 did gyre and gimble: I agree. and that adding hooks to consolekit (if they don't exist)

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] Properly initialise m-n_waiting_for_accept to prevent deadlock

2010-01-04 Thread Daniel Chen
Forwarded from Ubuntu Lucid/10.04 Thanks, -Dan From f89fc408dadbbb43f6ff5147845686792deb3683 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel T Chen crim...@ubuntu.com Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 21:44:37 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Properly initialise m-n_waiting_for_accept to prevent deadlock MIME-Version: 1.0

[pulseaudio-discuss] [PATCH 2/2] Use SOUND_CLASS instead of SOUND_FORM_FACTOR for newer udev

2010-01-04 Thread Daniel Chen
Forwarded from Ubuntu Lucid/10.04 Thanks, -Dan From 109b0d2016e89785d713f0a7666e530b2966edd8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel T Chen crim...@ubuntu.com Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 21:53:36 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Use SOUND_CLASS instead of SOUND_FORM_FACTOR for newer udev Newer udev versions

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] Is running as user smart or dumb?

2010-01-04 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 23:28 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 04.01.10 23:05, Markus Rechberger (mrechber...@gmail.com) wrote: Lennart, this is more likely your way to ignore user requests. snip So please, let it rest, and know that if you want to set the rules then you need to

Re: [pulseaudio-discuss] module-device-restore: Volume save and restore for all ports?

2010-01-04 Thread Tanu Kaskinen
ma, 2010-01-04 kello 23:10 +0100, Lennart Poettering kirjoitti: On Fri, 01.01.10 05:52, Tanu Kaskinen (ta...@iki.fi) wrote: - Track port volume and mute individually. That is, whenever the active port is switched, the previous port's volume and mute state should be saved to a database and

[pulseaudio-discuss] RtKit help

2010-01-04 Thread David Henningsson
Hi, I'm trying to get RtKit for my application up and running, and in the lack of an rtkit mailing list I'm using this one as the closest I could find :-) I'm using the reference implementation almost unmodified and end up with an org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied - Operation not permitted