On Jan 28, 2011, at 9:28 AM, Dan Urist wrote:
Now, if /etc/init/ssh.conf exists, puppet will correctly remove it and
the run will complete without error, but on the *next* and all
subsequent puppet runs I get a long dependency cycle error.
If /etc/init/ssh.conf does not exist, I get no
I think you can just add verbose=true in the master section of
/etc/puppet/puppet.conf
On Jan 27, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Romain Pelisse wrote:
On this topic, I was searching earlier how to add the --verbose to the
puppet.conf, so that when puppet is running as a service the log in
On Jan 26, 2011, at 8:27 AM, DEGREMONT Aurelien wrote:
Nigel Kersten a écrit :
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:27 AM, DEGREMONT Aurelien
aurelien.degrem...@cea.fr wrote:
Please take care that, for my site, and I think other ones,
puppetd -t
is *the* way to run puppet.
We never use
On Jan 24, 2011, at 2:38 AM, Carles Amigó wrote:
+1
El 24/01/2011 9:13, Daniel Pittman escribió:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 23:36, Stig Sandbeck Mathisens...@fnord.no wrote:
Jesse Reynoldsjessedreyno...@gmail.com writes:
--manual
Looks better than --interactive, since I don't assume
On Jan 24, 2011, at 3:00 AM, Adam Nielsen wrote:
What would be a better name for --test?
Using Gentoo's emerge as an example, how about --oneshot?
It's more than that though.
--onetime
--no-daemonize
--ignorecache
--verbose
--no-usecacheonfailure
and I think I'm missing some
On Jan 24, 2011, at 11:17 AM, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
- Original Message -
If we don't want --manual you could go with --watch as that's really
what I'm doing - watching puppet run. :)
I like --watch too
I hope this is a joke. I really think this name is a worse fit than --test.
On Jan 24, 2011, at 9:14 AM, Daniel Piddock wrote:
Dear list,
I'm attempting to mirror a folder containing a few large files from an
NFS location to the local drive. Subsequent runs take a lot longer than
I'd have expected, after the first run.
Using the following block a puppet apply
On Jan 24, 2011, at 1:17 PM, Adam Nielsen wrote:
The problem seems to be --test does so many things you can't concisely
describe it.
On the other hand, maybe --live-test would be good, as it makes it clear
changes will be made which seems to be the biggest complaint about --test.
I'd be
On Jan 23, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Adam Nielsen wrote:
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/2476
This does seem to confuse a fair few new users.
What would be a better name for --test?
Using Gentoo's emerge as an example, how about --oneshot?
To me, this sounds too similar to --onetime
On Jan 23, 2011, at 4:02 PM, James Louis wrote:
and what is the current functionality for the --test option?
To quote Nigel:
--onetime
--no-daemonize
--ignorecache
--verbose
--no-usecacheonfailure
and I think I'm missing some newer additions too.
--
You received this message because you
On Jan 23, 2011, at 4:47 PM, James Louis wrote:
that tells what options are applied when --test is used but doesn't explain
the functionality of --test (i.e. --test is an option to enable the puppet
agent to test it's connection to the puppet master by turning on the
following options...
used
when testing a real run, not a noop run.
If there was a clear word that described this functionality, we
probably wouldn't be having this discussion.
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Patrick kc7...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 23, 2011, at 4:47 PM, James Louis wrote
On Jan 23, 2011, at 4:53 PM, James Louis wrote:
exactly. to what purpose?
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Patrick kc7...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 23, 2011, at 4:47 PM, James Louis wrote:
that tells what options are applied when --test is used but doesn't explain
the functionality
On Jan 23, 2011, at 5:58 PM, eshamow wrote:
I can tell you that for me, and for my group, it's a halfway step
between reloading Puppet and watching the logs, and a full --debug --
no-daemonize run.
So for instance, when they're troubleshooting a bug in a newly-written
or modified class, I
that ontime or verbose have stolen the name
for another concept; perhaps interactive covers the standard use-case
well
enough?
Daniel
On Jan 23, 2011 2:45 PM, Patrick kc7...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 23, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Adam Nielsen wrote:
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/2476
On Jan 19, 2011, at 6:06 AM, Basil Kurian wrote:
root@client ~# puppetd --test
err: Could not retrieve catalog from remote server: undefined method
`closed?' for nil:NilClass
warning: Not using cache on failed catalog
err: Could not retrieve catalog; skipping run
This
On Jan 18, 2011, at 6:08 AM, Derek Tracy wrote:
I think that is the workflow I am going to use, before I kick off the rebuild
run
puppetca --clean fqdn
and keep the fqdn in the autosign.conf so when it rebuilds and kicks off
the puppet service the ca just autosigns the cert. It
On Jan 14, 2011, at 1:39 AM, Sven Sporer wrote:
How can I tell if oracle is install or any program when its install without
rpm?
How can I tell when the untar command is finished?
What happens when it takes a while to transfer 1.8GB file?
Does the user = oracle give me the environment
On Jan 13, 2011, at 6:26 PM, Corey Osman wrote:
What happens when it takes a while to transfer 1.8GB file?
Just a quick warning before I leave, don't even think of copying this using
puppet if you have version 0.25.x or below. Those version load the whole file
into RAM before copying.
On Jan 12, 2011, at 2:30 AM, Sven Sporer wrote:
Hi, I have a simple use case, but can't get the dependency resolution
to work on first run. This is not critical, but I want to understand
what's going on. Here's the szenario:
* puppet --version: 2.6.4
* on the bare system, I have vim 6.4
Are you using Passenger? If you don't know, the answer is probably no. If
not, do this:
Shutdown your puppet server. This might work:
service puppetmaster stop
Start it in debug:
puppetmasterd --verbose --debug --no-daemonize --trace
Then watch the output on the console for hints while
to be done before 4 (apt-get update)
On Jan 11, 2:25 pm, Patrick kc7...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 11, 2011, at 8:52 AM, Luc Suryo wrote:
1. in file /etc/apt/preferences I made several adjustment but for
puppet this is the relevant lines
# Backport for puppetlabs
Package: puppet puppet-common
On Jan 12, 2011, at 11:37 AM, michael.itc...@ocfl.net wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I have already done the setup which you mention below. I followed the
puppet-dashboard configuration guide to the tee,
which is why I’m surprised that this feature is not working. I have verified
that the
Well, your instructions also can work for upgrading puppet with a few small
changes. Might even work without changes.
On Jan 12, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Luc Suryo wrote:
that would be a catch 22 :)
the instruction was an answer to how to install puppet on a Lucid
server, there is no puppet
On Jan 11, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Mike wrote:
[main]
node_terminus = exec
external_nodes = /etc/puppet/bin/external_node
reports = http, store
reporturl = fedorahost.ocfl.net:3000/reports
However, when I restart the puppet master daemon I get the errors
below. Has anyone seen this problem
On Jan 11, 2011, at 8:52 AM, Luc Suryo wrote:
1. in file /etc/apt/preferences I made several adjustment but for
puppet this is the relevant lines
# Backport for puppetlabs
Package: puppet puppet-common puppetmaster facter
Pin: release a=lenny-backports
Pin-Priority: 900
2. then
On Jan 10, 2011, at 12:30 AM, Spacelee wrote:
I want to upgrade from puppet 0.24.8 to the latest puppet, and do I need to
modify my puppet code to fit for 0.26?
and another thing, I want to have multi-puppet server node, and 1 as the
master, and the others as the slave.
master serves
On Jan 10, 2011, at 8:01 AM, Adriana wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know if it is possible to automatically import the
puppet classes to the dashboard in order to manage them from the gui.
I didn't find exact instructions to make the puppet clients report
directly to the dashboard instead of
On Jan 7, 2011, at 3:35 PM, Jeff McCune wrote:
OK, so what if declaring* a class always added it to the top scope?
This seems like a relatively straight forward solution to a great many
concerns. The language doesn't change, existing manifests continue to
work and only the convention of
On Jan 8, 2011, at 3:52 AM, Adam Nielsen wrote:
2) Because of the exec command, /etc/timezone gets overwritten without a
backup being made like with other functions. Is there a way to get the file
included in the file bucket? I imagine I'd have to add an onlyif directive
to make sure
You'll need one or more mysql servers if you use storedconfigs. Storedconfigs
can be useful, but will drastically increase the server CPU usage and will
require a mysql backend. You can always turn it on later.
There are two (working) ways to setup SSL which is used for authentication and
On Jan 6, 2011, at 10:55 PM, Alan Barrett wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jan 2011, Mohamed Lrhazi wrote:
I added one resource to all the hosts, which dumps all environment
variables to a file called: /etc/mcollective/facts.yaml
This resource always reports that a change needs to be made, since
that file
On Jan 7, 2011, at 6:33 AM, Sébastien Barthélémy wrote:
Hello again,
thank you for your answers. I use puppet 2.6.4.
I don't think I have a site.pp
On Wed, 5 Jan 2011, Patrick wrote:
I'm finding that with my version of puppet (2.6.4), the checksum line
has no effect on the run time
On Jan 7, 2011, at 9:09 AM, bg wrote:
I've got a module that manages user id's, ssh-keys, and passwords. The
passwords are fetched from a text file containing userid and password hashes,
with the terms separated by a space.
My manifest (which seems to work fine, short of the function:
On Jan 7, 2011, at 11:22 AM, Jeff McCune wrote:
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:47 AM, luke.bigum luke.bi...@fasthosts.co.uk wrote:
Hi list,
Reading the thread can a class require an other class? it's been
mentioned that perhaps one way forward for the Puppet language is to
phase out the include
On Jan 6, 2011, at 4:45 AM, Brice Figureau wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 13:25 -0800, Patrick wrote:
On Jan 5, 2011, at 10:13 AM, Brice Figureau wrote:
On 05/01/11 18:11, Sébastien Barthélémy wrote:
Why is puppet so slow at this job? Is there any way I could
improve the
speed
On Jan 4, 2011, at 10:13 PM, Dmytro Bablinyuk wrote:
How can I get resource from http?
Short answer: You can't.
Longer answer: You need to wrap a program that can (like curl or wget) in an
exec.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users
On Jan 5, 2011, at 10:13 AM, Brice Figureau wrote:
On 05/01/11 18:11, Sébastien Barthélémy wrote:
Hello,
I store camera pictures in a git repository, which became quite big:
104 GB for the whole (non-bare) repository.
I wanted to fix the files permissions, and thought puppet might be
On Jan 5, 2011, at 10:13 AM, Brice Figureau wrote:
On 05/01/11 18:11, Sébastien Barthélémy wrote:
Hello,
I store camera pictures in a git repository, which became quite big:
104 GB for the whole (non-bare) repository.
I wanted to fix the files permissions, and thought puppet might be
(and, to my surprise, there wasn't already an obvious one...)
Regards,
Daniel
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 00:57, Patrick kc7...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 4, 2011, at 10:13 PM, Dmytro Bablinyuk wrote:
How can I get resource from http?
Short answer: You can't.
Longer answer: You need
On Jan 5, 2011, at 2:52 PM, Michael Knox wrote:
It would be neat if puppet could use tar.gz's as a source, instead of just
bare directory trees. So I've lodged a feature request:
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/5786
Many of my manifests for applications need to cover the following
On Jan 5, 2011, at 5:52 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Michael Knox michael.knox...@gmail.com
wrote:
It would be neat if puppet could use tar.gz's as a source, instead of just
bare directory trees. So I've lodged a feature request:
On Jan 4, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Daniel Pittman wrote:
On Jan 4, 2011 5:22 AM, Alan Barrett a...@cequrux.com wrote:
On Mon, 03 Jan 2011, James Ralston wrote:
So, here's my question: if you are currently using the svn update
approach to manage /etc/puppet on the puppetmaster, have you taken
On Jan 4, 2011, at 10:42 AM, Jason Parrott wrote:
Greetings,
Our environment consists of about 600 Redhat Enterprise Linux 3, 4, 5,
and soon 6 servers. We use cfengine 2 currently, but plan on
migrating to puppet. Right now, we have our root-owned cfengine
client running every 15
On Jan 1, 2011, at 12:53 AM, bowlby wrote:
Hi,
I'm figuring out a way to build a ssh-gateway. For that to work I want
access to the internal ipaddresses that are used by my slaves (which
get assigned by dhcp and thus are not predictable). This way I can
change the host-file on my
On Dec 29, 2010, at 7:13 AM, Shawn wrote:
err: /File[/var/lib/puppet/lib]: Failed to retrieve current state of
resource: undefined method `closed?' for nil:NilClass Could not retrieve file
metadata for puppet://puppetmaster.domainname.com/plugins: undefined method
`closed?' for
On Dec 28, 2010, at 11:39 AM, hai wu wrote:
Just tried to install mod_passenger from puppetlabs yum repo, and it is
failing with the following error:
--- Package mod_passenger.i686 0:2.2.5-1 set to be updated
-- Processing Dependency: rubygem-passenger = 2.2.5-1 for package:
On Dec 28, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
Second, I'm working on refactoring our puppet configuration, and in so
doing it would be best to ensure I haven't unexpectedly changed any
resources. Is there any machine-parsable way of seeing the set of
resources that result from a
, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Patrick kc7...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 28, 2010, at 11:39 AM, hai wu wrote:
Just tried to install mod_passenger from puppetlabs yum repo, and it is
failing with the following error:
--- Package mod_passenger.i686 0:2.2.5-1 set to be updated
-- Processing Dependency
On Dec 27, 2010, at 8:11 PM, cyrus wrote:
Hi:
I have something like this:
class xinetd {
... some Puppet code ...
class xinetd::telnet {
... some Puppet code ...
}
}
node 'host1' {
include xinetd::telnet
}
However, when running Puppet says it can't find
On Dec 24, 2010, at 6:41 AM, Daniel Piddock wrote:
Unfortunately it looks like puppeteers expect this unusual name resolution
order, if they ever knowingly stumble upon it (e.g. 4483, 4472). Either I
need to hack around this problem carefully or wait a long time for the next
major
If you want to start over, these should give you a good start at finding and
removing the pieces. By design these will remove your puppet configuration.
rm -Rf /etc/puppet
rm -Rf /var/lib/puppet
rm -Rf /usr/share/puppet
This should be a good start at removing the config.
On Dec 23, 2010, at
On Dec 23, 2010, at 6:39 AM, sanjiv.singh wrote:
This should be very easy, provided your classes do not conflict. A
node can include any number of classes, so all you have to do is
change this:
node node1 {
include tomcat_class_name
}
node node2 {
include
On Dec 23, 2010, at 10:48 AM, Douglas Garstang wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Nigel Kersten ni...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Douglas Garstang
doug.garst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Nigel Kersten ni...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
On
On Dec 22, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Derek Yarnell wrote:
So I was asked a bit about implications of distributing something
sensitive through puppet. After a client talks to the puppet server
(giving its local facts) and retrieves its catalog is the client allowed
to fetch resources that may not be
On Dec 22, 2010, at 7:35 PM, Derek Yarnell wrote:
On 12/22/10 8:38 PM, Patrick wrote:
On Dec 22, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Derek Yarnell wrote:
So I was asked a bit about implications of distributing something
sensitive through puppet. After a client talks to the puppet server
(giving its
On Dec 20, 2010, at 2:43 AM, Felix Frank wrote:
Sorry for the late answer, my provider had a downtime this weekend.
Tough call. There is no such thing as a transparent SSL proxy afaik,
because without decrypting requests, the proxy cannot make any header
based decisions.
This may well
On Dec 19, 2010, at 1:37 AM, Ken Barber wrote:
Would be terrible - because I would lose the arguments if the package was
defined elsewhere earlier. That would be dumb. Also - the reverse is true ...
by defining your own package you may be ruining someone else's package
definition which
On Dec 18, 2010, at 3:50 AM, Ken Barber wrote:
For the record, an alternative that I don't believe was mentioned is to do
something like:
if !defined(Package[foo]) {
package {foo: ensure = installed }
}
In general this is a bad idea though. Mostly because it can surprise you in
bad
On Dec 16, 2010, at 12:45 AM, Felix Frank wrote:
On 12/15/2010 07:40 PM, Patrick wrote:
On Dec 15, 2010, at 3:09 AM, Felix Frank wrote:
On 12/15/2010 12:04 PM, Patrick wrote:
I'm looking for a way to run more than one puppetmaster on the same
server under passenger. Most
On Dec 16, 2010, at 12:45 AM, Felix Frank wrote:
On 12/15/2010 07:40 PM, Patrick wrote:
In summery, both servers work, but no redirection is taking place.
Hum, I'm not in the habit of using ProxyPass directives. I rather add
RewriteRules that include the [P] flag.
One stupid idea
On Dec 16, 2010, at 7:55 AM, Felix Frank wrote:
On 12/16/2010 10:28 AM, Patrick wrote:
On Dec 16, 2010, at 1:04 AM, Brice Figureau wrote:
My original error was that I didn't set:
SSLProxyEngine on
Now I'm just getting errors that say all requests are forbidden. I
assume
On Dec 14, 2010, at 10:57 PM, sanjiv.singh wrote:
Try putting just this in a file called test.pp. Then try this:
puppet --verbose --debug test.pp
thanks patrick for quick reply
i didnt get U, what U tring to say...
how this is going to help us by placing code from
I'm looking for a way to run more than one puppetmaster on the same server
under passenger. Most of the puppet CPU load is waiting for the catalogs to
compile. This also seems to be mostly what takes large amounts of RAM. I have
storedconfigs on.
I want to be able to move the fileserver to
On Dec 15, 2010, at 3:09 AM, Felix Frank wrote:
On 12/15/2010 12:04 PM, Patrick wrote:
I'm looking for a way to run more than one puppetmaster on the same server
under passenger. Most of the puppet CPU load is waiting for the catalogs to
compile. This also seems to be mostly what
On Dec 15, 2010, at 6:08 AM, jcbollinger wrote:
On Dec 15, 5:04 am, Patrick kc7...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm looking for a way to run more than one puppetmaster on the same server
under passenger. Most of the puppet CPU load is waiting for the catalogs to
compile. This also seems to be mostly
On Dec 15, 2010, at 1:48 PM, Brice Figureau wrote:
On 15/12/10 12:04, Patrick wrote:
I'm looking for a way to run more than one puppetmaster on the same
server under passenger. Most of the puppet CPU load is waiting for
the catalogs to compile. This also seems to be mostly what takes
On Dec 14, 2010, at 3:18 AM, Paul Willis wrote:
Hi
I'm trying puppet for the first time and attempting to get it working in
Amazon EC2 with Ubuntu 10.04 using the default puppet 0.25.4-2ubuntu4, I've
read the 'Pulling Strings' book and tried following various tutorials found
on the net
On Dec 14, 2010, at 10:29 PM, sanjiv.singh wrote:
exec {run_process:
command = /usr/local/runprocess.sh,
path = '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin
}
Try putting just this in a file called test.pp. Then try this:
puppet --verbose --debug test.pp
--
You received this
On Dec 12, 2010, at 8:00 PM, Josh wrote:
Greetings,
I'm just getting started with setting up Puppet in an environment of
about ~15 servers, a mixture of Mac OS X servers and Ubuntu servers -
each with different roles and obviously different versions of configs.
Before I get too carried
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Daniel Pittman dan...@rimspace.net wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 22:41, Geoff geoffnew...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone had any experience getting puppet to update multiple OS's on a
single server?
Not without a container style virtualization solution wrapped
On Dec 10, 2010, at 2:34 AM, luke.bigum wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion Patrick, it led me to the cause of the
problem :)
I wrote a very simple local test manifest to emulate the Exec problem
with 'puppet apply' and it still occurred. Out of pure habit, I often
execute 'ls -l' when I
On Dec 10, 2010, at 5:47 AM, Adam Heinz wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Patrick kc7...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to administer the mysql database on some servers using puppet.
When I'm done, I want:
*) The DB to have a root password.
*) I want to define a few databases, users
On Dec 9, 2010, at 7:14 AM, Martijn Grendelman wrote:
I made a small mistake. Please see at the bottom.
On 09-12-10 15:30, Martijn Grendelman wrote:
An example: add the following to
puppet_path/modules/modulename/lib/facter/augeas_available.rb
-- cut here --
require 'facter'
On Dec 10, 2010, at 3:40 AM, luke.bigum wrote:
This doesn't appear to affect the actual execution of commands, so
don't be worried about the wrong commands being executed based on the
CWD of Puppet.
Except it might be. Puppet might have been trying to execute the file and
then failing
Thanks. I didn't see that.
On Dec 10, 2010, at 12:45 PM, Justin Brehm wrote:
There's an exec in this that sets the root password (line 180).
https://github.com/blt04/puppet-mysql/blob/master/manifests/classes/server.pp
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Patrick kc7...@gmail.com wrote
On Dec 8, 2010, at 11:45 PM, Felix Frank wrote:
On 12/09/2010 05:13 AM, Patrick wrote:
On Dec 8, 2010, at 6:38 PM, Daniel Pittman wrote:
Sadly, no. I very much missed the feature. We ended up using the apt
preferences file to implement that behaviour
If I was doing it over I would use
On Dec 9, 2010, at 9:14 AM, luke.bigum wrote:
Interesting, I've noticed that puppet runs triggered from a daemonised
puppetd aren't affected by the problem (as Dashboard and /var/log/
messages says their is no errors), but when run from the command line
as puppetd --test it fails as usual
On Dec 9, 2010, at 10:07 AM, Brice Figureau wrote:
On 09/12/10 03:38, Daniel Pittman wrote:
Sadly, no. I very much missed the feature. We ended up using the apt
preferences file to implement that behaviour
If I was doing it over I would use a define that added the package
resource and
On Dec 9, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Chris C wrote:
How robust and secure is the embedded fileserver in puppet?
So far my environment consists of 15 nodes with about 80 checks per node.
I'm doing alot of md5 checks on files. I anticipate ~150 nodes. I am
currently using autofs and the source
On Dec 8, 2010, at 1:22 AM, Hubert Krause wrote:
Hello List,
I have a Problem with classes wich uses augeas. if augeas is not installed,
The complete catalog will not compile. So I can not install augeas with a
different class. I have to switch off all classes wich uses augeas, until
Puppet will, by design, apply classes in a random order. To specify the order,
you want to use the require parameter.
exec { echoone:
command = /bin/echo $var1,
}
exec { echotwo:
command = /bin/echo $var2,
require = Exec['echoone'],
}
exec { echothree:
On Dec 8, 2010, at 2:32 AM, Hubert Krause wrote:
Hello,
Am Wednesday 08 December 2010 11:00:11 schrieb Patrick:
The best answer is usually, install Augeas when you install Puppet. If
that's not possible, I know of two options: 1) Custom fact wrapper
2) Use a bootstrap enviroment
On Dec 8, 2010, at 6:38 PM, Daniel Pittman wrote:
Sadly, no. I very much missed the feature. We ended up using the apt
preferences file to implement that behaviour
If I was doing it over I would use a define that added the package resource
and also used concat to automatically build up
On Dec 7, 2010, at 11:52 AM, Douglas Garstang wrote:
If I'm pushing out a bunch of files in a directory, like this...
file {
/usr/local/lg/bin/:
source = puppet://${server}/usr/local/lg/bin,
mode = 755,
owner = root,
group = root,
On Dec 6, 2010, at 3:55 AM, Matt Keating wrote:
How do you do a backtick inside an exec?
eg:
exec { Testworld:
command = /bin/echo hello `cat /etc/hostname` /tmp/hello.txt,
}
In general, you can't because that would need to be run by a shell, not by
puppet. If you want to do
On Dec 6, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Eric Snow wrote:
Here is the error I get:
err: //.../File[/root/.bash_profile]: Failed to retrieve current state
of resource: Could not retrieve information from source(s)
puppet:///modules/bash/bash_profile at ...
However, the file is there:
# ll
On Dec 6, 2010, at 11:53 AM, russell.fulton wrote:
I am getting this error on the clients. (I am running with --test).
rerunning the command works as expected.
This does not happen every time. I have no idea what the message
means or more precisely what a PSON is...
This can happen when
On Dec 6, 2010, at 3:54 PM, Bostjan Skufca wrote:
Hi!
Did someone else notice similar behaviour?
I use puppet kick hostname.domain.net to occasionally trigger
catalog runs. But it does not work if I specify IP in auth.conf, like
this:
path /run
On Dec 2, 2010, at 1:03 PM, Sid wrote:
ruby: 1.8.7.302-4
ruby-augeas: 0.3.0-1.el5 (EPEL)
augeas-libs: 0.7.3-1.el5 (EPEL)
puppet: 2.6.4
I am unable to get Puppet/Augeas to update the sysctl.conf file when
using the following configuration. I have tested changing the file
with augtool and
Why not sync the files directly to that directory?
On Dec 3, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Don Jackson wrote:
So here is a scenario:
I have a directory:
./foo
./foo/file1
./foo/file2
./foo/file3
…
./foo/fileN
I populate this directory on a configured
Puppet won't bother other files in a directory it manages unless you turn on
purge = true.
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Don Jackson
puppet-us...@clark-communications.com wrote:
On Dec 3, 2010, at 12:56 PM, Patrick wrote:
Why not sync the files directly to that directory
On Dec 2, 2010, at 12:56 PM, Kikanny wrote:
I'm trying to run puppet using the tarball and so far, I've been
unsuccessful. The system I'm trying to run puppet on is running RHEL
5.3. Now first of all, this system does not have access to internet.
Therefore I don't have any access to any of
On Nov 30, 2010, at 5:25 AM, Os wrote:
As in using your operating systems package management. If you're running
Debian/Ubuntu that'll be a .deb, if you're using RedHat/CentOS/Fedora
that'll be a .rpm.
Thanks for the advice, thats something I did not think about but
absolutly solves my
On Nov 30, 2010, at 7:03 AM, Daniel Piddock wrote:
Hello,
I fear that I have done something stupid in my manifests that requires
a redesign. To take an example:
I have the global statement:
Package {
ensure = latest,
require = Class['repositories'],
}
I then have a repositories
On Nov 29, 2010, at 10:13 AM, Alan Barrett wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Alan Barrett wrote:
It seems to me that I should be able to take the $ssldir/ca/ca_crt.pem
files from the two puppetmasters, concatenate them to create a
ca-bundle.pem file, and place the bundle in some suitable place
On Nov 29, 2010, at 12:55 PM, David Birdsong wrote:
I've been wrestling to get the puppet ca server to sign client certs
and have them successfully reconnect later. I think I've done:
find /var/lib/puppet/ -type f -delete ; sudo find /etc/puppet/ssl
-type f -delete ; sudo
On Nov 23, 2010, at 4:53 PM, Adam Nielsen wrote:
Hi all,
I've been reading up on Puppet but there are a few things I am unsure of, and
I'm hoping someone here can advise.
As I understand it the idea behind Puppet is to describe how a machine should
be configured in a single place, and
On Nov 24, 2010, at 3:50 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
I mentioned this in an earlier thread, but here's a dedicated one.
We made a big change between 0.24.x and 0.25.x where we moved from
XMLRPC to REST.
How do people feel about us dropping all XMLRPC support from 2.7.x,
such that it only
On Nov 23, 2010, at 6:45 AM, Ashley Penney wrote:
Hi,
We've been having some internal discussions about the best way to handle
certain cases and I thought I'd turn to the list to solicit opinions on how
other people have solved this issue (or don't, as the case may be). The
issue is
201 - 300 of 605 matches
Mail list logo
