Am 26/03/2024 um 14:29 schrieb Christoph Heiss:
> Bit of perl fun again.
> $err from detect_country_tracing_to() can be empty string under certain
> circumstances (according to a forum post [0]). The // operator
> evaluates an empty as true, thus `warn` receives an empty string to and
> just
Am 27/03/2024 um 14:09 schrieb Folke Gleumes:
> include 'PVEAPIToken=' prefix in the example for target-endpoint which
> is mainly used for remote migrations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Folke Gleumes
> ---
> src/PVE/JSONSchema.pm | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>
applied,
Am 22/02/2024 um 17:40 schrieb Stefan Hanreich:
> its broken since the change in semantics of the PUT endpoint [1]
>
> [1]
> https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-network.git;a=commit;h=3e3cafabaf955d53c4c2d4e346bf5c3a5c6d1852
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hanreich
> Originally-by: Alexandre Derumier
>
Am 05/04/2024 um 15:17 schrieb Stefan Lendl:
> This add several tests for SDN VNets.
> State setup as well as testing results is done only via the API to test on the
> API boundaries and not against the internal state. Internal state and config
> files are mocked to avoid requiring access to
Am 28/03/2024 um 10:41 schrieb Fabian Grünbichler:
> this should fix failures of the template instances because either of the two
> other import services picked up the pool in question first.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler
> ---
> ...dd-systemd-unit-for-importing-specific-pools.patch |
Am 08/04/2024 um 15:25 schrieb Stefan Lendl:
> PSS properly accounts for memory usage of shared libraries and is
> therefore better suited when summing up memory usage of multiple
> processes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Lendl
> ---
> debian/patches/series | 1 +
>
Am 09/12/2022 um 15:25 schrieb Markus Frank:
> This Patch is for enabling AMD SEV (Secure Encrypted
> Virtualization) support in QEMU
>
> VM-Config-Examples:
> amd_sev: type=std,nodbg=1,noks=1
> amd_sev: es,nodbg=1,kernel-hashes=1
>
> Node-Config-Example (gets generated automatically):
>
PSS properly accounts for memory usage of shared libraries and is
therefore better suited when summing up memory usage of multiple
processes.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Lendl
---
debian/patches/series | 1 +
debian/patches/use-pss-instead-of-rsz.diff | 11 +++
2 files
Thomas Lamprecht writes:
> Am 08/04/2024 um 14:04 schrieb Stefan Lendl:
>> I agree summing up processes it would make sense to use PSS.
>> Unfortunately, ps does not report the PSS.
>
> The `ps` from the Debian Bookworm version of the `procps` package does report
> it here if I use something
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 11:24:48AM +0100, Fiona Ebner wrote:
> When a fleecing option is given, it is expected that each device has
> a corresponding "-fleecing" block device already attached, except for
> EFI disk and TPM state, where fleecing is never used.
>
> The following graph was adapted
Am 08/04/2024 um 14:17 schrieb Stefan Lendl:
> For summing up actual memory usage of precesses rsz is more suitable
> then vsz.
>
> This reverts commit cd5cf20cc8af53427dcb9b08486c68f376ce8743.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Lendl
> ---
> debian/patches/series | 1 -
>
Am 08/04/2024 um 12:36 schrieb Stefan Sterz:
> On Mon Apr 8, 2024 at 11:30 AM CEST, Friedrich Weber wrote:
>> +constructor: function(conf) {
>> +let me = this;
>> +// make copies in order to prevent subclasses from accidentally writing
>> +// to objects that are shared with other
Am 08/04/2024 um 14:04 schrieb Stefan Lendl:
> I agree summing up processes it would make sense to use PSS.
> Unfortunately, ps does not report the PSS.
The `ps` from the Debian Bookworm version of the `procps` package does report
it here if I use something like `ps -C kvm -o pss` though, FWICT
For summing up actual memory usage of precesses rsz is more suitable
then vsz.
This reverts commit cd5cf20cc8af53427dcb9b08486c68f376ce8743.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Lendl
---
debian/patches/series | 1 -
debian/patches/use-vsz-instead-of-rsz.diff | 13 -
2 files
awk internally uses float for every calculation, printing a large float
with awk results in 1.233e+09 format which causes the script to fail afterwards.
Instead I am printing the float without decimals.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Lendl
---
debian/patches/awk-printf.diff | 16
Thomas Lamprecht writes:
> Hi,
>
> Am 28/02/2024 um 23:47 schrieb Roland:
>> any reason why this did not get a response ? (i do not see rejection of
>> this ,nor did it appear in
>> https://git.proxmox.com/?p=ksm-control-daemon.git;a=summary )
>
> No reason, but even if this looks pretty
Already mentioned in the commits, but gave this another spin today on my
test VM and everything seems to work as intended:
* Rollbacking on failure
* Allocating an IPv6 IP on start, if there is already an IPv4 allocated
* Ignoring subnets without any configured DHCP-Range
Also, the pre-existing
On Mon Apr 8, 2024 at 11:30 AM CEST, Friedrich Weber wrote:
> Currently, `Proxmox.window.Edit` initializes `extraRequestParams` and
> `submitOptions` to two objects that, if not overwritten, are shared
> between all instances of subclasses. This bears the danger of
> modifying the shared object in
Signed-off-by: Markus Frank
---
www/manager6/qemu/DisplayEdit.js | 57 ++--
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/www/manager6/qemu/DisplayEdit.js b/www/manager6/qemu/DisplayEdit.js
index 9bb1763e..17b02ee4 100644
---
For SPICE and VNC, a different message is displayed.
The backend code for the clipboard option can be found in the
'config: enable vnc clipboard parameter in vga_fmt'-commit in qemu-server.
Signed-off-by: Markus Frank
---
www/manager6/qemu/DisplayEdit.js | 41
Currently, `Proxmox.window.Edit` initializes `extraRequestParams` and
`submitOptions` to two objects that, if not overwritten, are shared
between all instances of subclasses. This bears the danger of
modifying the shared object in a subclass instead of overwriting it,
which affects all edit
On 06/04/2024 17:07, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> Am 30/01/2024 um 18:10 schrieb Friedrich Weber:
> [...]
>> +raise_param_exc({ 'overrule-shutdown' => "Not applicable for HA
>> resources." })
>> +if $overrule_shutdown;
>
> This probably could be implemented through a CRM command
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 11:24:54AM +0100, Fiona Ebner wrote:
> Similar to how Datastore.AllocateSpace is required for the backup
> storage, it should also be required for the fleecing storage.
>
> Removing a fleecing storage from a job does not require more
> permissions than for modifying the
On 06/04/2024 10:37, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
>> Still, right now I think the primary motivation for this overruling
>> feature is to save GUI users some frustration and/or clicks. In this
>> scenario, a user will overrule only their own tasks, which is possible
>> with the current check. What do
24 matches
Mail list logo
