Am 17/05/2023 um 15:42 schrieb Stefan Sterz:
> sorry just noticed i forgot: adding tests for this was
>
> Suggested-by: Dominik Csapak
I mean, it's really great that we finally get some tests here and if only
Dominik statement made you do it, then chapeau to him! But, Suggested-by's
should be
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 02:17:18PM +0200, Stefan Sterz wrote:
> On 23.05.23 12:12, Christoph Heiss wrote:
> > On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 10:56:24AM +0200, Stefan Sterz wrote:
> > [..]
>
> yeah that would probably be best, as it's also closer to what the user
> wants (a working ldap setup) than either
On 23.05.23 12:12, Christoph Heiss wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 10:56:24AM +0200, Stefan Sterz wrote:
>> On 23.05.23 08:58, Christoph Heiss wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 03:39:31PM +0200, Stefan Sterz wrote:
[..]
>>> While reviewing that, I had a look at the `Net::LDAP` perl library
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 10:56:24AM +0200, Stefan Sterz wrote:
> On 23.05.23 08:58, Christoph Heiss wrote:
> > On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 03:39:31PM +0200, Stefan Sterz wrote:
> >> [..]
> > While reviewing that, I had a look at the `Net::LDAP` perl library
> > again, if it provides a way to _somehow_
On 23.05.23 08:58, Christoph Heiss wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 03:39:31PM +0200, Stefan Sterz wrote:
>> [..]
>>
>> this commit also adds a test file that tests the regex against a
>> number of common pitfalls. including distinguished names that are
>> structurally similar to those reported as
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 03:39:31PM +0200, Stefan Sterz wrote:
> [..]
>
> this commit also adds a test file that tests the regex against a
> number of common pitfalls. including distinguished names that are
> structurally similar to those reported as erroneously forbidden
> earlier. these tests
sorry just noticed i forgot: adding tests for this was
Suggested-by: Dominik Csapak
On 17.05.23 15:39, Stefan Sterz wrote:
> according to the current specification of the string representation of
> ldap distinguished names (DN) presented by RFC 4514 [1] the current
> regex checking ldap DNs
according to the current specification of the string representation of
ldap distinguished names (DN) presented by RFC 4514 [1] the current
regex checking ldap DNs still prevents users from entering valid
DNs.
for example we do not allow multi-valued RelativeDistinguishedNames as
these are
