2012/7/9 Floris Bruynooghe :
> On 7 July 2012 16:06, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>> 2012/7/7 Floris Bruynooghe :
>>> While I was fixing issue #168 I was wondering if it does not make
>>> sense to make the PYTEST_TAG variable (in _pytest.assertion.rewrite)
>>> available on the public API? Python itse
On 7 July 2012 16:06, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2012/7/7 Floris Bruynooghe :
>> While I was fixing issue #168 I was wondering if it does not make
>> sense to make the PYTEST_TAG variable (in _pytest.assertion.rewrite)
>> available on the public API? Python itself has imp.get_tag(), so
>> maybe p
2012/7/7 Floris Bruynooghe :
> Hi all,
>
> While I was fixing issue #168 I was wondering if it does not make
> sense to make the PYTEST_TAG variable (in _pytest.assertion.rewrite)
> available on the public API? Python itself has imp.get_tag(), so
> maybe pytest.get_tag() is a reasonable name?
I a
