Hi,
I just spent some time reading the dev docs so these comments are just
based on the docs and not actually using the new API. In general it
looks pretty sensible.
- being able to have funcargs like funcargs directly is really nice, a
lot more obvious than calling
this work? seems magic
metafunc.addcall(id='mail.python.org', param=mailpython)
I feel like this makes it clear how much more powerful parametrizing
funcargs themselves is.
cheers
Brianna
On 16 August 2012 18:58, Brianna Laugher brianna.laug...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I just spent some
Hi,
So I gave my talk on pytest at PyCon AU on the weekend :) Thought it
might be of interest to folks here.
info: http://2012.pycon-au.org/schedule/52/view_talk?day=sunday
slides: http://www.slideshare.net/pfctdayelise/funcargs-other-fun-with-pytest
code: https://gist.github.com/3386951
video:
