On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 4:30 PM, altern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi again
been reading the 1.1 documentation and new features, sounds quite nice.
Any estimations on when would it be ready for development? i read its
still unstable.
1.1 has been in Beta for a few months now. In pyglet
ok, thanks for the explanation!
enrike
Alex Holkner(e)k dio:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 4:30 PM, altern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi again
been reading the 1.1 documentation and new features, sounds quite nice.
Any estimations on when would it be ready for development? i read its
still
I'd like to second the request for a small tutorial about integrating
pyglet with stackless. It would be great to hear your experiences
trying to integrate the two, and any pitfalls that may arise. Thanks.
Naveen
On May 28, 9:58 pm, Adam Bark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/5/29 Alex Holkner
Or you could try something like pyro
(http://pyro.sourceforge.net/index.html) if you were after something
even more abstract and didn't feel that networking was likely to be a
performance critical part of your application (c.f.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacies_of_Distributed_Computing)
On Jun 30, 4:17 am, Drew Smathers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I find Twisted *far* easier than working directly with
sockets - but of course, many people will reply telling you otherwise.
You might also consider looking at something like eventlet
