Quoting James Henstridge [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just as an idea, what would people think about using the __getattr__ and
__setattr__ functions to get and set widget data. This would require
altering the current __getattr__ routines to call their parent's
__getattr__ method for unknown
I was actually thinking of some of the subclasses that already implement a
__getattr__ method to expose some of the widget structure members. For
these currently it raises an exception if it doesn't recognise an
attribute name. The change would be for it to call its superclass's
__getattr__
Hello,
I have released a new snapshot of pygtk, that will probably become 0.5.11.
It contains the __[gs]etattr__ additions, and I have implemented a
(null-ok) tag for the .defs files that produces code so that None can be
passed in place of a string or GtkObject or boxed type (GdkFont/GdkColor
