Where could it be?
No, seriously. The pyGTK tutorial and the Gnome/Gtk documentation would be it
of course. I was just thinking if there were more must reads, books, websites
or whatever.
The problem is there is too MUCH of fun using GNOME (and python for fast and
easy hacks). I suppose what
Hi all,
Having a general Wiki for PyGTK will be very nice.
I know there is PyGTK FAQ, but I am thinking of Wiki where anything
related to PyGTK can put.
Regards,
Baiju M
___
pygtk mailing list pygtk@daa.com.au
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 12:19:11PM +0530, Baiju M wrote:
Hi all,
Having a general Wiki for PyGTK will be very nice.
I know there is PyGTK FAQ, but I am thinking of Wiki where anything
related to PyGTK can put.
A wiki is a good idea if someone use it and maintain it. Only one way to
Hi Ian,
On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 17:51 -0700, Ian McKellar wrote:
Binding e-d-s is a pain for a variety of reasons. When I last tried I
found that the main problems were that a lot of their signals have GList
arguments (which are listed as gpointer in the object definitions) and a
lot of their
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:29:37AM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 12:19:11PM +0530, Baiju M wrote:
Hi all,
Having a general Wiki for PyGTK will be very nice.
I know there is PyGTK FAQ, but I am thinking of Wiki where anything
related to PyGTK can put.
A
I'm more interested in knowing what sort of content would go in the Wiki
-- while I am happy to support it I know that maintaining a wiki
organized is slightly more than a small chore.
Examples, FAQs, developer resources, application lists etc
Everything that end users and developers wants to
I can host it on the same PmWiki farm as www.solfege.org if the pygtk
people don't have some other preferences to where to put it.
Good idea. I know very little about PmWiki though. Are there any other
options or would we be tied to it?
Myself I'd prefer MediaWiki, but the setup is rather
Baiju M wrote:
Hi all,
Having a general Wiki for PyGTK will be very nice.
I know there is PyGTK FAQ, but I am thinking of Wiki where anything
related to PyGTK can put.
We could, as the rest of gnome and the gtk+ team use
http://live.gnome.org for development.
That'd make it easier to
Stefan Elwesthal wrote:
Where could it be?
No, seriously. The pyGTK tutorial and the Gnome/Gtk documentation would be it of course. I was just thinking if there were more must reads, books, websites or whatever.
Most of the material which is of interest to pygtk users/developers can
be found
On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 10:41 -0300, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:29:37AM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 12:19:11PM +0530, Baiju M wrote:
Hi all,
Having a general Wiki for PyGTK will be very nice.
I know there is PyGTK FAQ,
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:56:06AM -0300, Johan Dahlin wrote:
Baiju M wrote:
Hi all,
Having a general Wiki for PyGTK will be very nice.
I know there is PyGTK FAQ, but I am thinking of Wiki where anything
related to PyGTK can put.
We could, as the rest of gnome and the gtk+ team
Hi everybody,
I'm happy to announce the 0.5.3 version of Gazpacho. In this release
some parts of the core have been rewritten and many many bugs have been
fixed.
I'd like to say thanks to Mattias Karlsson, Anders Carlsson and Rafael
Villar. All of them made a lot of contributions and helped
On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 19:52 +0530, Baiju M wrote:
On Apr 11, 2005 7:33 PM, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shouldn't we be using live.gnome.org? There's already a wiki area for
Gtk+, so why not pygtk?
GNOME is a very large domin, So we can follow a convention to name
Hi!
Yes, and I'm actually starting to get a grip on documentation, I even managed
to translate some .po files this weekend ;)
Seriously, as soon as I get that website of mine I plan to put up little this
is how I did it stories, hopefully they will be useful to others.
I haven't tried Gazpacho
It is good to see gazpacho, writing in pygtk makes a
lot of sense :)
I just took a look at the gazpacho site. Templates will be nice to
have, although I think it is better to build components and re-use
those across your applications, rather than have templates. The
problem with templates is
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:58:08AM -0300, Johan Dahlin wrote:
I can host it on the same PmWiki farm as www.solfege.org if the pygtk
people don't have some other preferences to where to put it.
Good idea. I know very little about PmWiki though. Are there any other
options or would we be
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 04:39:19PM +0100, John Gill wrote:
What I've really wanted from glade for some time is the ability to build
frames, rather than top level windows. What I want to be able to do us
use gazpacho to build components that I can re-use across my GUI's. I'd
like
Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 04:39:19PM +0100, John Gill wrote:
What I've really wanted from glade for some time is the ability to build
frames, rather than top level windows. What I want to be able to do us
use gazpacho to build components that I can re-use across
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 12:08:52PM -0400, John Ehresman wrote:
Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 04:39:19PM +0100, John Gill wrote:
What I've really wanted from glade for some time is the ability to build
frames, rather than top level windows. What I want to be able
Hi,
Is there a way I can make my application be just a popup menu?
I mean, when the user opens it, there is no window, it automatically
pops up a menu right where the mouse pointer is. Is that possible?
Thanks,
César
___
pygtk mailing list
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 09:23:48PM -0300, César Leonardo Blum Silveira wrote:
Is there a way I can make my application be just a popup menu?
I mean, when the user opens it, there is no window, it automatically
pops up a menu right where the mouse pointer is. Is that possible?
I don't really
Didn't know about live.gnome.org when I answered this. I think you
should be using live.gnome.org. Prefixing, using groups (if available on
that wiki) or categories will make it easy to keep track of you pages.
Tom Cato
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:45:02PM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
On Mon,
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 11:01:50PM +0800, Stefan Elwesthal wrote:
Anyway, I read the other day about some fellow that built a whole
postgres/pyGTK system for healtcare, which made go crazy of
exceitement. (besides, there ARE in fact business-systems in
postgres/pyGTK already so...)
Yeah,
Steve McClure schrieb:
On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 18:11 +0200, Marcus Habermehl wrote:
Steve McClure schrieb:
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 09:40 +0100, Marcus Habermehl wrote:
Steve McClure schrieb:
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 15:27, Marcus Habermehl wrote:
Hi.
I want to write the output of
On Apr 11, 2005 9:43 PM, Tom Cato Amundsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Didn't know about live.gnome.org when I answered this. I think you
should be using live.gnome.org. Prefixing, using groups (if available on
that wiki) or categories will make it easy to keep track of you pages.
I was aware of
On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 11:02 -0300, Johan Dahlin wrote:
[...]
Perhaps you could help out writing more documentation :-)
Seriously though, there are plenty of stuff to do. I think on the
general agenda for helping developers to quickly develop python/gtk
applications a good gui designer is
26 matches
Mail list logo
