Re: [pygtk] python and GTK+-3 - possible?

2011-03-14 Thread John Lumby
R Park wrote: On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 4:39 PM, John Lumby wrote: Is it posible today, using some combination of python and pygtk-family packages Not with PyGTK. It is the intention of the maintainers that PyGTK dies a slow, gentle death alongside GTK2. The future of GTK3 is available

Re: [pygtk] Testing PyGTK installer for Mac OS X

2011-03-14 Thread Yann Leboulanger
On 03/11/2011 12:45 PM, Anders F Björklund wrote: Hi, we needed a simpler way to install PyGTK on Mac OS X, besides using macports/fink or jhbuild to compile it... So we are testing an all-in-one (= both gtk+ and pygtk) Universal installer for Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard and later:

Re: [pygtk] python and GTK+-3 - possible?

2011-03-14 Thread John Lumby
J Lumby wrote My attempts to run my test app against GTK3 all fail with import errors, no doubt because I have built and installed things myself, and I find it difficult to know what is going on. Further to that  -  I have discovered this line in the current pygobject/Makefile.am 

Re: [pygtk] problems porting pygtk app to pygobject on Fed. 14

2011-03-14 Thread John Lumby
J Stowers wrote: Firstly, F-14 is probably too old. This pygobject+g-i has moved a lot in the last few months. Thanks John.    Eventually I got it working on that F-14 system (without upgrading any packages). * use glib (i.e. static bindings) and GObject (from gi.repository import

Re: [pygtk] problems porting pygtk app to pygobject on Fed. 14

2011-03-14 Thread John Stowers
from gi.repository import Gdk, Gtk, GObject ... class ToggleBut(Gtk.Window): def __init__(self, parent=None): self.mywindow = Gtk.Window.__init__(self) self.myobject = GObject.__init__() What idiom is this? Why are you constructing self.myobject that way? Why are you