On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Giuseppe Penone gius...@gmail.com wrote:
ok installing python-gi-cairo made it, this is to be added to the
dependencies if drawingarea is used.
Hi,
looks like this bug should be reported to Ubuntu.
Regards,
Tomeu
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Giuseppe
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 09:32, Mark Summerfield m...@qtrac.eu wrote:
I'm trying to learn PyGObject but find that a lot of material is
actually about PyGtk.
Can you---or anyone---provide any links to projects that are using
PyGObject 3.x so that I can look at their source code?
Hi Mark,
do
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 17:30, John Accoun json...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you Giuseppe, but I think I would still like some more guidance.
I had a bit of trouble following x-tile source, but from what I
understood, you get the window list by interacting with x11 C library
which you load using
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 19:08, cristian abarzúa abarz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
Install the development packages for gtk ( libgtk2.0-dev)
He says to be building those from source. I guess it would help to see
the config.log file.
Regards,
Tomeu
Regards.
Cristian
El 14/03/12 14:45, Wadud
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 19:55, Angel Guzman Maeso shaka...@gmail.com wrote:
But apparently, the first problem comes, I need compile gir files for create
the typelib files.
Both .gir and .typelib files should be generated during the build
process. Check config.log for reasons why this didn't
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 21:06, Arjan Molenaar gap...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 Nov 2011, at 17:25, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 08:46, Arjan Molenaar gap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on porting my projects to Gtk3 and PyGobject3. However, I run
into a nasty issue.
I
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 13:06, Arjan Molenaar gap...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 Nov 2011, at 10:08, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 21:06, Arjan Molenaar gap...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 Nov 2011, at 17:25, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 08:46, Arjan Molenaar gap...@gmail.com
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 08:46, Arjan Molenaar gap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on porting my projects to Gtk3 and PyGobject3. However, I run
into a nasty issue.
I subclass Gtk.DrawingArea in order to provide view functionality for a
Gaphas canvas. For this I override some signals.
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 20:04, Angel Guzman Maeso shaka...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/11/1 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 19:37, Angel Guzman Maeso shaka...@gmail.com
wrote:
Where I can find 0.11 (1.0) for download and compile on Ubuntu? I need
to
fix this ASAP (I am
Hi,
what version of GStreamer are you using? I think only 0.11 (future
1.0) can be used through introspection. There are other programs that
are being ported to introspection and that use GStreamer, such as
Pitivi, I would look at them for ideas.
Regards,
Tomeu
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 12:05,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 19:37, Angel Guzman Maeso shaka...@gmail.com wrote:
Where I can find 0.11 (1.0) for download and compile on Ubuntu? I need to
fix this ASAP (I am doing a app for my dissertation).
If you are in such a hurry, may be better to stay with the old static bindings.
Regards,
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 14:25, Pavel Holejsovsky
pavel.holejsov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Giuseppe,
On 7/1/2011 10:21 AM, Giuseppe Penone wrote:
I'm a GTK+ developer that used to work in pygtk2 and now ported the code
to pygobject introspection.
For my (GPL) application
Hi all,
this is just a heads up about how PyGTK and PyGObject+introspection
applications are going to coexist in GNOME 3.2.
The next stable release of PyGObject will be 3.0 and will be parallel
installable with 2.28.
This way applications using the static bindings will just pick up 2.28
without
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:56, Giuseppe Penone gius...@gmail.com wrote:
Did anybody notice that the function
gtk_clipboard_set_with_data ()
is missing from the bindings?
method name=set_with_data
c:identifier=gtk_clipboard_set_with_data
introspectable=0
This
software.
Regards,
Tomeu
Anyway I'm sorry if I offended somebody, I apologise.
Regards,
Giuseppe.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 13:18, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:56, Giuseppe Penone gius...@gmail.com wrote:
Did anybody notice that the function
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 05:48, Just Fill Bugs mozbug...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
On 07/01/2011 04:35 AM, Giuseppe Penone wrote:
+1: provide us a tutorial so that we can learn how to add missing binded
functions ourself and then provide the patch.
Take a look at
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 18:49, Avi Levy avi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am new here so I'm not sure what is considered ontopic. I am trying to
get familiar with the new additions in gtk3 and pygobject by porting an
application written using gtk2 and no introspection, and libglade
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 07:22, Greg Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
Are there any examples of using gi to access a GtkStyleContext?
I'm completely failing to get anything useful out of it.
Hi,
see here:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 09:09, Gregory Ewing
greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
I have a GtkTextView inside a GtkFrame which is
on a GtkLayout.
In Gtk 2, if you typed more text than would fit
in the visible area of the widget, it would
auto-scroll.
But in Gtk 3, the TextView *enlarges
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 00:52, Greg Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
I'm trying to compile gobject-introspection-0.10.4 on
MacOSX 10.6.4 and getting the following errors:
/usr/include/libkern/i386/_OSByteOrder.h:49: syntax error, unexpected '{',
expecting ',' or ';' in '{' at '{'
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:31, Greg Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
After some hunting around I found the gir-repository package,
which looks like it should help, so I tried to compile and
install it. However, it fails trying to generate .gir files
for Gtk-2.22
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 21:38, Andrew Steele steeley...@gmail.com wrote:
You can still specify arguments at construction time, e.g. sizegroup =
Gtk.SizeGroup(mode=Gtk.SizeGroupMode.BOTH). The important thing to remember
is to 'name' the argument with 'mode='.
As for you're other questions, I'd
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 21:53, Adam Plumb adampl...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm the developer for nautilus-python, the python bindings for the
nautilus extension framework. I'm having trouble figuring out where
to begin with porting the bindings from PyGTK to PyGI.
Hi, I suggest that you look at how
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 13:34, Giuseppe Penone gius...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with gtk.clipboard() and gtk.selectiondata() in my open
source app http://giuspen.com/cherrytree
when pasting clipboard content from arabic website taking data from the
target text/html.
What browser
://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/widget/src/gtk2/nsClipboard.cpp#707
HTH,
Tomeu
but what I get is
猼慰瑳汹㵥昢湯楳敺›㌱┰∻㰾灳湡猠祴敬∽潣潬㩲爠摥∻㰾灳湡猠祴敬∽潣潬㩲戠慬正∻䐾㑅䡇‱❈ㅄ☧‹䥁✠❄⼵ㄧ✠ⱄ䨯
䔪✠䐵ⴧ⠠㘹✠㥄䑄䠠䔪㤠䑅⼼灳湡㰾猯慰㹮⼼灳湡
Regards,
Giuseppe.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 20:15, Dieter Verfaillie
diet...@optionexplicit.be wrote:
Quoting Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 13:46, Dieter Verfaillie
diet...@optionexplicit.be wrote:
Quoting Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org:
It's not up to me to decide anything
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 13:30, Dieter Verfaillie
diet...@optionexplicit.be wrote:
Quoting John Palmieri jo...@redhat.com:
If you feel this is a really bad idea, speak now.
It's a great idea, maybe a bit overdue even ;)
Some questions/thoughts:
* Where are the following going to be
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 13:46, Dieter Verfaillie
diet...@optionexplicit.be wrote:
Quoting Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org:
Building on the above, we could have part of a reliably method to
detect [2] if the static bindings get imported but you already have
imported gi (but not necessarily
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 22:28, Robert Park rbp...@exolucere.ca wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
It would be great if you could help making that page more useful (and
maybe easier to find), right now the number of contributors is
ridiculously small
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 23:52, Robert Park rbp...@exolucere.ca wrote:
Since nobody's replied and Google doesn't even really know, I emailed
John Palmieri directly, who kindly explained that the file
/usr/share/gir-1.0/Gtk-2.0.gir holds all the answers. It's the
introspection data in XML format,
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:42, jors worby...@gmail.com wrote:
El mar, 05-10-2010 a las 08:56 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 23:52, Robert Park rbp...@exolucere.ca wrote:
Since nobody's replied and Google doesn't even really know, I emailed
John Palmieri directly, who
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 13:56, jors worby...@gmail.com wrote:
El mar, 05-10-2010 a las 10:51 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:42, jors worby...@gmail.com wrote:
El mar, 05-10-2010 a las 08:56 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 23:52, Robert Park rbp
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 09:50, Damien Caliste damien.cali...@cea.fr wrote:
Hello,
Le 24/09/2010, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org a écrit :
Can you verify it's the same on your end in case we have some problem
that is dependent on the environment?
Ok, the last trunk (with the patch) still
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 00:48, John Stowers
john.stowers.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 10:07 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Hi,
John Stowers has proposed that PyGObject changes it's version
numbering to match that of glib. This means that the next stable
version will be 2.26
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 18:28, Damien Caliste damien.cali...@cea.fr wrote:
Hello,
I've worked on a patch to correct the memory leak in invoke()
function. The patch has been submitted, see:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630271
Le 03/09/2010, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 02:13, John Stowers
john.stowers.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 17:54 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
I know that pygtk doesn't have an excess of maintainers right now, but
these modules should be relatively mature already.
Agree. I was one of the first large
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 22:37, John Palmieri jo...@redhat.com wrote:
Hmm, seems my original e-mail never made it to the list. Thanks for posting
this Tomeu.
- John Stowers john.stowers.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 17:54 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Hi all,
as you
On 08/25/2010 01:22 PM, John Stowers wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Tomeu Vizoso
tomeu.viz...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 22:37, John Palmierijo...@redhat.com wrote:
Hmm, seems my original e-mail never made it to the list. Thanks for posting
this Tomeu
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 15:22, John Stowers john.stowers.li...@gmail.com wrote:
I just sent a mail to the python-hackers list with some of my queries.
Replying here as well as application authors will be interested.
Cool.
But my concerns are basically
* What is the state of the more
Hi all,
as you may know J5 is working on the Python3 port of PyGObject and he
has found that porting the gio static bindings is a lot of work and
somewhat useless as the rest of the static bindings aren't likely to
be ported to Python 3 at all.
I would like to put for consideration the idea of
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 18:30, pogipogia pogipogia pogipo...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask but are the any future plans
on integrating pygtk with pypy.
Hi, I can only say about PyPy that the move to introspection will make
it easier because there will be less
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:57, Simon van der Linden svdlin...@gnome.org wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 10:07 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
The rationale is that it will help people a bit to know what to expect
from a given PyGObject release. He's already numbering his PyGtk
releases matching Gtk
Hi Jens,
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 06:55, Jens Knutson jens.knut...@gmail.com wrote:
I am organizing a sprint for my local Python user group to try to port (at
least partially) a widely used module to P3k. (We're looking at Mutagen
right now.)
If this goes well, or at the very least, if it
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 09:56, Andrew Steele steeley...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 August 2010 14:58, John Stowers john.stowers.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Ping?
Anyone feel like doing this? Can I do it?
John
Looks like you should go for it.
A release now would be useful for end-users so its in
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 15:45, Paolo Losi paolo.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to compile pygobject 2.10.1 on Centos 5.5.
I need to recompile since we're using a custom python 2.5.
2.10.1 is the most recent version of pygobject that supports the version
of glib shipped with centos
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 05:46, John Stowers
john.stowers.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 15:32 +1200, John Stowers wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:57 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 15:30, John Stowers john.stowers.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All
Hi,
I am pleased to announce version 2.21.5 of the Python bindings for GObject.
The new release is available from ftp.gnome.org as and its mirrors as
soon as its synced correctly:
http://download.gnome.org/sources/pygobject/2.21/
What's new since PyGObject 2.21.4?
- Shut up some
the API provided by g-i for compatibility with
the static bindings. The idea is that this will make easier to port
existing software and will make existing documentation useful for a
longer time.
Regards,
Tomeu
2010/7/8 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 16:19, Gerald
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 05:56, John Stowers john.stowers.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Jason Heeris jason.hee...@gmail.com wrote:
Looking through the PyGTK gobject type constants[1], I noticed the
gobject.TYPE_BOXED constant. What is it, exactly? Does it have a use
in
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 15:30, John Stowers john.stowers.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
It would be great if we could do a PyGtk stable release to align with
the last gtk-2.0 release. I am happy to do this if no-one else wants to.
I guess you should go for it.
Also, would it be worth
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 15:48, John Stowers john.stowers.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
First of all, PyGI and GObject introspection is the way forward.
Now, that being said, it seems a little silly to spend all this effort
porting C apps in GNOME to gtk-3.0 only to see the first PyGtk app drag
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 16:19, Gerald Britton gerald.brit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:03 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 15:48, John Stowers john.stowers.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
First of all, PyGI and GObject introspection is the way
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 08:52, Jason Heeris jason.hee...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to get a PyGTK app going on a Windows XP installation. It
requires PyGTK 2.17. I have Python 2.6 and GTK 2.18 set up just fine,
but of course there's no binary installer for PyGTK 2.17. So I grabbed
the source
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 15:17, John Stowers john.stowers.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Excuse the yelling. Does anyone else get these annoying auto-responses
from supp...@mpcustomer.com when they reply to the list?
Yup, though I'm not sure how to find the email address that is causing
it, sounds
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 15:13, John Stowers john.stowers.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Jason Heeris jason.hee...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to get a PyGTK app going on a Windows XP installation. It
requires PyGTK 2.17. I have Python 2.6 and GTK 2.18 set up just fine,
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 17:04, Jason Heeris jason.hee...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 July 2010 21:13, John Stowers john.stowers.li...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been generating the python installers for windows.
Good work :)
This, and the fact that PyGtk has effectively been deprecated an
replaced
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:03, Francesco Fumanti
francesco.fuma...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
Onboard already users that flag but unfortunately it does not keep it above
other applications. However, onscreen keyboard users usually don't have
access to a hardware keyboard,
/sugar/repos/mainline/blobs/master/src/jarabe/frame/framewindow.py
Regards,
Tomeu
Thanks nevertheless for telling me your idea.
Francesco.
On 06/30/2010 02:02 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:03, Francesco Fumanti
francesco.fuma...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your
the cairo shim as a python module so the _gi module
stops linking to it (Tomeu Vizoso)
- add drawing area demo (John (J5) Palmieri)
- sort the demo list (John (J5) Palmieri)
- rename iter to treeiter so we aren't using a python reserved
word (John (J5) Palmieri)
- Fixup
handling of null-ok in virtual methods (Ludovic L'Hours)
- Fall back to use the floating references API in glib if
there isn't a sinkfunc defined. (Tomeu Vizoso)
- Revert Drop sinkfuncs. (Tomeu Vizoso)
- [giounix] Make it possible to compile on glib 2.20 (Johan Dahlin
sinkfuncs. (Tomeu Vizoso)
- Clear error if we failed the import (Colin Walters)
- Added missing , to keyword list of gio.GFile.set_attribute
(John Ehresman)
- Fix arg conversion in gio.GFile.set_attribute (John Ehresman)
- Set constants under python 2.5 or before
in configure.
Tomeu Vizoso tomeu.viz...@collabora.co.uk (12)
* Pre-release version bump 0.6.0
* Wrap C arrays in structs as GArrays before converting to Python
* Install pre-commit hook that checks the code changes for style conformance
* Apply consistent whitespace formatting
Hi,
is anybody interested in lending a hand with PyGI and the port to Python 3?
We need help with reviewing the PyGI patch queue and also need someone
who pushes the Python 3 effort forward.
This is the PyGI review queue:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 16:50, Zachary Goldberg zgoldb...@src.gnome.org wrote:
Hey Folks
PyGi is building up a bunch of patches that need review. It'd be
great if we could have some people take a look and review these this
weekend (Simon and Tomeu, i'm looking at you guys =P).
Count on me
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 20:56, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 16:47 +, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 22:22, Zachary Goldberg zgold...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:16 PM, John Palmieri jo...@redhat.com wrote:
- Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:52, A.T.Hofkamp a.t.hofk...@tue.nl wrote:
goli wrote:
Hi all,
I am a newbie to the python language, I used pygtk with python2.6 for a
week, now I want to switch to python3.
You should not do that, it is too early to use Python 3.
I installed python3.1 and wrote a
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 22:17, Zachary Goldberg z...@zachgoldberg.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 19:25, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
Zach suggested when2meet, please record your preferences:
http
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:09, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 16:56, John Palmieri jo...@redhat.com wrote:
- Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
Hi all,
looks like we have agreed on a set of tasks and we have people with
the will and capacity
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 19:15, Simon van der Linden
svdlin...@src.gnome.org wrote:
On 02/17/2010 08:07 PM, Zachary Goldberg wrote:
. What about dates?
I don't have any strong preference, but I'm going to propose April 1-5
just for the sake of starting the discussion.
That may be a rough
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 19:25, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 19:15, Simon van der Linden
svdlin...@src.gnome.org wrote:
On 02/17/2010 08:07 PM, Zachary Goldberg wrote:
. What about dates?
I don't have any strong preference, but I'm going to propose April 1
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 16:56, John Palmieri jo...@redhat.com wrote:
- Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
Hi all,
looks like we have agreed on a set of tasks and we have people with
the will and capacity to work on them during the hackfest. This
concrete set of tasks may seem
Hi all,
looks like we have agreed on a set of tasks and we have people with
the will and capacity to work on them during the hackfest. This
concrete set of tasks may seem small at first, but I think it's just
what is left to do in order to keep Python as a compelling language on
which to develop
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 22:22, Zachary Goldberg zgold...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:16 PM, John Palmieri jo...@redhat.com wrote:
- Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
Hi,
there's interest in having a hackfest sponsored by the GNOME
Foundation that would give a push
-ZG
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 22:22, Zachary Goldberg zgold...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:16 PM, John Palmieri jo...@redhat.com wrote:
- Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
Hi,
there's
Hi,
there's interest in having a hackfest sponsored by the GNOME
Foundation that would give a push to some issues that are important to
the Pygtk community: support for Python 3.x and gobject-introspection.
How does it sound?
Regards,
Tomeu
___
pygtk
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 21:16, Stephen George steve_...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
Hi All,
I've searched the archives, and pyGTK web site, I can't find any
information about how the Python 3.x port is going.
Does anyone know where I should hang out to find out more about the
python 3.x port of
Sorry for not directly replying your question, but (if you have the
interest) I would recommend reading up about object oriented design
and design patterns. Code organization is an important aspect of
controlling complexity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GRASP_%28Object_Oriented_Design%29
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:44, Radek Vykydal rvyky...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello list,
I am trying to solve this problem:
In root-only environment (Anaconda installer) we are running very simple
C window manager (only taking care of setting focus of windows), Anaconda
pygtk GUI, and on demand
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 09:22, Rafael Villar Burke (Pachi)
pa...@rvburke.com wrote:
Alex Dedul wrote:
Hi!
Any news on porting pygtk to python 3 ? I would be glad to help maybe
almost full-time on this. Just would be good to know current status on
this matters first.. And if none projects or
Hi all,
as you may know, work has been going on to add gobject-introspection
support to PyGObject. This would mean that we can use from python any
GObject-based library that has introspection support without having to
write and build specific bindings for that library. Most commonly used
Ping
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:23, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 18:40, Simon van der Linden
svdlin...@src.gnome.org wrote:
On 13 Oct 2009, at 18:40, Colin Walters wrote:
Does anyone know the status of merging the Summer of Code branch for
improving
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 18:44, Johan Dahlin jo...@gnome.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 18:40, Simon van der Linden
svdlin...@src.gnome.org wrote:
On 13 Oct 2009, at 18:40, Colin Walters wrote:
Does anyone know
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 18:40, Simon van der Linden
svdlin...@src.gnome.org wrote:
On 13 Oct 2009, at 18:40, Colin Walters wrote:
Does anyone know the status of merging the Summer of Code branch for
improving the GObject Introspection support?
Nothing has been merged yet. A bug has been
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 17:12, René 'Necoro' Neumann li...@necoro.eu wrote:
Well -- you are not initializing gtk.Image. So it's your very own
mistake. I don't see a pygtk issue here.
This is Python, any crash is a bug.
Regards,
Tomeu
___
pygtk
Hi,
have found a double free and I'm not sure what is the proper fix.
To reproduce, instantiate a boxed: python -c from gi.repository
import Pango; Pango.FontDescription()
This fixes it, but may not be the right thing to do:
diff --git a/gi/pygi-info.c b/gi/pygi-info.c
index 6f16bb6..d5f8105
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 17:43, Simon van der Linden
svdlin...@src.gnome.org wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 17:27 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
have found a double free and I'm not sure what is the proper fix.
Thanks for finding it, Tomeu!
To reproduce, instantiate a boxed: python -c from
Hi,
anybody has any feedback on this patch? We are leaking 2MB per window
switch in Sugar because of this, so would be very convenient to get it
pushed to git so we can ask distros to ship it as a patch.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=596612
Thanks,
Tomeu
--
«Sugar Labs is anyone
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 01:37, Jeffrey Barishjeff_bar...@earthlink.net wrote:
John Stowers wrote:
I would also recommend moving to PyWebitGtk asap. GtkMozembed is a train
wreck.
Can you say more about what's wrong with GtkMozembed? Also, can you direct
me to documentation for PyWebkitGtk?
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 07:34, Kim Adilka...@proactiveindustrial.net wrote:
I once wrote a gtk program in C that displayed about 30 animations on a
drawing area and they moved around the screen, and performance was
excellent. The drawingarea size was 1600x1200 and the animations were
very
now on and
you should profile the C side.
For a first quick try, sysprof has worked well for me in the past.
systemtap is good as well but has a steeper learning curve.
HTHs,
Tomeu
Thanks,
Kim
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 07:34, Kim Adilka...@proactiveindustrial.net
wrote
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 06:13, Rick Hightowerrichardhighto...@gmail.com wrote:
I read the release notes and it seems you don't support Python 3 yet.
I even tried running some PyGTK examples with Python 3 and they do not work.
Is Python3 on your roadmap?
I could not find mention of it in your
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:09, Xenofon Papadopoulosxpa...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to save a gtk.Pixmap to an image file? (i.e. a .png file)
You can create a pixbuf from that pixmap, then save it:
pixbuf = gtk.gdk.Pixbuf(gtk.gdk.COLORSPACE_RGB,
has_alpha=False, bits_per_sample=8,
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 05:02, Wubin Ququwu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there any modules or softwares have the same function as pynotify has on
MS Windows?
GIO (included in pygobject) can help you monitor files and
directories, though I haven't tested it in Windows:
Hi,
I'm working on pybank and have found a problem when removing the
floating reference after construction.
The current plan is to base pybank on pygobject, so pybank would
basically create at runtime the equivalent of the code generated for
the gtk, gstreamer, etc bindings.
I'm wondering now
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12:01, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on pybank and have found a problem when removing the
floating reference after construction.
The current plan is to base pybank on pygobject, so pybank would
basically create at runtime the equivalent
95 matches
Mail list logo
