On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 20:56, David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 16:47 +, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 22:22, Zachary Goldberg zgold...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:16 PM, John Palmieri jo...@redhat.com wrote:
- Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 22:17, Zachary Goldberg z...@zachgoldberg.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 19:25, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
Zach suggested when2meet, please record your preferences:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:09, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 16:56, John Palmieri jo...@redhat.com wrote:
- Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
Hi all,
looks like we have agreed on a set of tasks and we have people with
the will and capacity to
On 02/17/2010 08:07 PM, Zachary Goldberg wrote:
. What about dates?
I don't have any strong preference, but I'm going to propose April 1-5
just for the sake of starting the discussion.
That may be a rough week for people as it overlaps both easter and
passover.
No problem for me. I'd prefer
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
Opinions? Once we agree on the above points, we can come up with a
budget and a more detailed plan to present to the GNOME Foundation
board.
April works fine for me; thanks again for looking at a hackfest! I'm
pretty
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 19:15, Simon van der Linden
svdlin...@src.gnome.org wrote:
On 02/17/2010 08:07 PM, Zachary Goldberg wrote:
. What about dates?
I don't have any strong preference, but I'm going to propose April 1-5
just for the sake of starting the discussion.
That may be a rough
- Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 19:15, Simon van der Linden
svdlin...@src.gnome.org wrote:
On 02/17/2010 08:07 PM, Zachary Goldberg wrote:
. What about dates?
I don't have any strong preference, but I'm going to propose April
1-5
just for the
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 19:25, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 19:15, Simon van der Linden
svdlin...@src.gnome.org wrote:
On 02/17/2010 08:07 PM, Zachary Goldberg wrote:
. What about dates?
I don't have any strong preference, but I'm going to propose April
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 16:56, John Palmieri jo...@redhat.com wrote:
- Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
Hi all,
looks like we have agreed on a set of tasks and we have people with
the will and capacity to work on them during the hackfest. This
concrete set of tasks may seem
On 02/13/2010 08:41 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Opinions? Once we agree on the above points, we can come up with a
budget and a more detailed plan to present to the GNOME Foundation
board.
Good for me.
--
Simon van der Linden
___
pygtk mailing list
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 5:51 PM, John Palmieri jo...@redhat.com wrote:
So we haven't heard from Johan at all? It would be good to have him there at
least for guidance. I don't know what the team looks like these days but he
has always been the public face of PyGTK so it would be nice for
- Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
Hi all,
looks like we have agreed on a set of tasks and we have people with
the will and capacity to work on them during the hackfest. This
concrete set of tasks may seem small at first, but I think it's just
what is left to do in order to
On 2/13/10 2:41 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Right now it seems to me that Boston, MA would be the best place to
hold the hackfest, as two people are local, one lives relatively
close, and facilities have been offered. What about the dates?
I'm away from March 21-27 so April might be better.
John
Hi all,
looks like we have agreed on a set of tasks and we have people with
the will and capacity to work on them during the hackfest. This
concrete set of tasks may seem small at first, but I think it's just
what is left to do in order to keep Python as a compelling language on
which to develop
- Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 16:48, Zachary Goldberg zgold...@gmail.com
wrote:
Callbacks, and recently ive been bitten hard by the lack of
nullable
argument support so thats in my crosshairs as well.
Cool. Do people think we should wait a bit
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 22:22, Zachary Goldberg zgold...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:16 PM, John Palmieri jo...@redhat.com wrote:
- Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
Hi,
there's interest in having a hackfest sponsored by the GNOME
Foundation that would give a push
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 16:48, Zachary Goldberg zgold...@gmail.com wrote:
Callbacks, and recently ive been bitten hard by the lack of nullable
argument support so thats in my crosshairs as well.
Cool. Do people think we should wait a bit more for more interested
participants?
Regards,
Tomeu
Hi,
On 02/05/2010 06:50 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
there's interest in having a hackfest sponsored by the GNOME
Foundation that would give a push to some issues that are important to
the Pygtk community: support for Python 3.x and gobject-introspection.
How does it sound?
Excellent. I already
Hi,
there's interest in having a hackfest sponsored by the GNOME
Foundation that would give a push to some issues that are important to
the Pygtk community: support for Python 3.x and gobject-introspection.
How does it sound?
Regards,
Tomeu
___
pygtk
- Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
Hi,
there's interest in having a hackfest sponsored by the GNOME
Foundation that would give a push to some issues that are important
to
the Pygtk community: support for Python 3.x and
gobject-introspection.
How does it sound?
Regards,
20 matches
Mail list logo
