On Thursday 19 September 2002 12:28 am, Ricardo Javier Cardenes Medina wrote:
Hi.
I've managed to solve the problems with HP PA-RISC arch. It seems that (at
least with gcc 3.0.4), HPPA doesn't like huge compiles (long branches, in
fact), so I do not recommend to use the '-c' option with it.
On Thursday 19 September 2002 3:07 am, Peter Lipa wrote:
Hi Gerard,
Thanks for the updated release and your progress on PyCute - looks great
(after a few minutes of testing)!
Here is some feedback:
I built the win32 commercial Qt3.05 version
PyQwt-sip332_20020807-Qt-305.win32-py2.2.exe and
On Thursday 19 September 2002 01:01 am, Phil Thompson wrote:
I am happy to send you the the binary PyQwt windows installer and zip
builds for the Qt3.0.5 commercial if you want to put them on your
website. For a binary-only release, according the the commercial qt
license, I see no
On Thursday 19 September 2002 01:01 am, you wrote:
On Thursday 19 September 2002 3:07 am, Peter Lipa wrote:
Hi Gerard,
Thanks for the updated release and your progress on PyCute - looks great
(after a few minutes of testing)!
Here is some feedback:
I built the win32 commercial Qt3.05
In reference to the discussion going on right now about licensing... Yes,
the qt dll can be distributed. Thus, PyQt can be distrubuted allowing that
you are not using the new commercial version of PyQt. The end user, of
course, would not be allowed to use qt in a development fashion such as
On Thursday 19 September 2002 8:49 pm, Greg Fortune wrote:
On Thursday 19 September 2002 10:28 am, Phil Thompson wrote:
On Thursday 19 September 2002 5:41 pm, Greg Fortune wrote:
In reference to the discussion going on right now about licensing...
Yes, the qt dll can be distributed.
Hi Gerard
I was just writing you an email when your bugfix mail came in .
I did all the checks and the bugfix you suggested, and almost everything
works now fine and stable, just as with the version
before (plus the printing in bodedemo.py is now working).
All but one of the pyqwt demos
On Thursday 19 September 2002 5:41 pm, Greg Fortune wrote:
In reference to the discussion going on right now about licensing...
Yes, the qt dll can be distributed.
...
To the PyKDE list:
I apologize for opening a can of worms wrt Qt-license issues with my remark
in a previous
