Ben,
On Feb 6, 6:57 pm, Ben Bangert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're hoping to have 0.9.5 ready for PyCon, its main focus at this
point ticket-wise is i18n, unicode, and some documentation. I believe
there's a wiki page up with the 1.0 plans, not entirely sure on the
schedule yet though. :)
On Feb 6, 5:08 am, Pedro Algarvio, aka, s0undt3ch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This mail is to announce a package, NoseBitten, which includes plugins
for 3 softwares, Trac, Nose and Bitten.
Intended audience are projects hosted on a Trac
It would be nice if those parameters could be passed to a constructor
in a single js call, that would make wraping it in a TW quite easy
and it would allow having multiple taggers in the same page.
So you mean like more object oriented javascript?...
I've never done that, but I can try.
Ian Bicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FWIW, there will be no way for Routes to distinguish an incoming request
for FastEnet-10/100 from FastEnet-10%2f100 -- WSGI/CGI dictates that the
path is decoded before it is sent to Routes, so the two end up the same.
I didn't realize that. So even
On Feb 7, 2007, at 12:30 PM, Chris Shenton wrote:
FWIW, there will be no way for Routes to distinguish an incoming
request
for FastEnet-10/100 from FastEnet-10%2f100 -- WSGI/CGI dictates
that the
path is decoded before it is sent to Routes, so the two end up the
same.
I didn't
Ben Bangert wrote:
On Feb 7, 2007, at 12:30 PM, Chris Shenton wrote:
FWIW, there will be no way for Routes to distinguish an incoming
request
for FastEnet-10/100 from FastEnet-10%2f100 -- WSGI/CGI dictates
that the
path is decoded before it is sent to Routes, so the two end up the
