Hi,
you may use peppercorn for this purpose :
import peppercorn
controls = request.params.items()
values = peppercorn.parse(controls)
try:
appstruct =
I started using colander in my pyramid project. Created a simple data model
mapping using colander
class DataModel(colander.MappingSchema):
user_count = colander.SchemaNode(colander.Integer())
expiration_date = colander.SchemaNode(colander.Date())
comment =
FYI I've released pyramid_formalchemy 0.4.3 [1]
It's now pyramid 1.3+ compatible and the pyramid_fa scaffold is also up to date.
For now I've added zope.component as a dependencie (pyramid removed it
because of the py3 compat I guess)
[1] http://docs.formalchemy.org/pyramid_formalchemy/
On
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 5:35 AM, rihad ri...@mail.ru wrote:
On Dec 18, 12:52 am, Gael Pasgrimaud g...@gawel.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 9:41 PM, rihad ri...@mail.ru wrote:
Is going back to 1.2 the only way to try pyramid_formalchemy out?
No, you don't really need a template. You can
On Dec 18, 12:52 am, Gael Pasgrimaud g...@gawel.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 9:41 PM, rihad ri...@mail.ru wrote:
Is going back to 1.2 the only way to try pyramid_formalchemy out?
No, you don't really need a template. You can add pyramid_formalchemy
to a project with only a few extra
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 10:04 AM, rihad ri...@mail.ru wrote:
On Dec 18, 12:52 am, Gael Pasgrimaud g...@gawel.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 9:41 PM, rihad ri...@mail.ru wrote:
Is going back to 1.2 the only way to try pyramid_formalchemy out?
No, you don't really need a template. You
On Dec 18, 12:52 am, Gael Pasgrimaud g...@gawel.org wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 9:41 PM, rihad ri...@mail.ru wrote:
Is going back to 1.2 the only way to try pyramid_formalchemy out?
No, you don't really need a template. You can add pyramid_formalchemy
to a project with only a few extra
$ pserve --reload development.ini
...
File
/usr/home/rihad/pyramid/sol/env/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyramid_formalchemy-0.4.2-py2.7.egg/pyramid_formalchemy/views.py,
line 2, in module
import zope.component.event
ImportError: No module named component.event
--
You received this
Hi, folks. I'm trying to follow this guide:
http://docs.formalchemy.org/pyramid_formalchemy/
to install pyramid_formalchemy for pyramid-1.3a2-py2.7. I've
easy_installed pyramid_formalchemy with its dependencies, added
'pyramid_formalchemy',
'fa.jquery',
to requires in setup.py and rerun
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 12:19 -0800, rihad wrote:
Hi, folks. I'm trying to follow this guide:
http://docs.formalchemy.org/pyramid_formalchemy/
to install pyramid_formalchemy for pyramid-1.3a2-py2.7. I've
easy_installed pyramid_formalchemy with its dependencies, added
'pyramid_formalchemy',
Thanks, but... after doing what you suggested all looks great at
first:
$ paster create --list-templates
Available templates:
basic_package: A basic setuptools-enabled package
paste_deploy: A web application deployed through paste.deploy
pylons_fa: Pylons application template with
Is going back to 1.2 the only way to try pyramid_formalchemy out?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
pylons-discuss group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 9:41 PM, rihad ri...@mail.ru wrote:
Is going back to 1.2 the only way to try pyramid_formalchemy out?
No, you don't really need a template. You can add pyramid_formalchemy
to a project with only a few extra lines to your __init__.py:
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 12:41 -0800, rihad wrote:
Is going back to 1.2 the only way to try pyramid_formalchemy out?
That'd be the easiest way, at least until pyramid_formalchemy is updated
to work with Pyramid 1.3.
- C
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 16:05 -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 12:41 -0800, rihad wrote:
Is going back to 1.2 the only way to try pyramid_formalchemy out?
That'd be the easiest way, at least until pyramid_formalchemy is updated
to work with Pyramid 1.3.
For the record, how
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 16:05 -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 12:41 -0800, rihad wrote:
Is going back to 1.2 the only way to try pyramid_formalchemy out?
That'd be the easiest way, at least until
I've built dozens of sites over the past 14 or so years , with Ad
Agencies, Large Brands, Tech Startups, Major Media companies.
Doing this, I've learned that Frameworks are really really great for
the run-of-the-mill project that has a quick deadline, doesn't do
anything new exciting, and has a
Hi, Chris. Since Deform doesn't mention CSRF, I assume it must be done
by another session-based plugin at the discretion of the developer?
Like, opt-in security? :)
Also, the docs say that some form controls rely on JS being available.
That's understandable, like in the case of date-time controls.
Thanks for the tip and sorry, I didn't mean to offend anybody.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
pylons-discuss group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Doesn't Deform fill in the form with the values submitted when a
validation error occurs?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
pylons-discuss group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 07:19 -0800, rihad wrote:
Doesn't Deform fill in the form with the values submitted when a
validation error occurs?
Can you describe what's unclear about
http://docs.pylonsproject.org/projects/deform/en/latest/basics.html#validating-a-form-submission
- C
--
You
On Dec 14, 11:34 pm, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 07:19 -0800, rihad wrote:
Doesn't Deform fill in the form with the values submitted when a
validation error occurs?
Can you describe what's unclear
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 01:59 -0800, rihad wrote:
On Dec 13, 6:55 am, Mike Orr sluggos...@gmail.com wrote:
Pyramid is a mid-level framework like Pylons. For a
lightweight framework, see web.py, Aspen, Quixote, Flask, Werkzeug, or
several others. Pyramid's focus is on being scalable, both
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Mike Orr sluggos...@gmail.com wrote:
Ptah aims to offer the same kind of bells and whistles Django does.
It's at an initial alpha release. It's the closest Pyramid has to a
full-stack framework right now.
Kotti is specifically a content-management system.
On Dec 13, 2011, at 6:09 AM, Chris McDonough wrote:
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 01:59 -0800, rihad wrote:
You are presuming that there is a one true form library that does
everything well that is completely satisfactory in all cases. I can
tell you from pretty hard experience that this is not
I'd also like to add that Pyramid's level of abstraction (measured in brick
size, if you will) is just right for many projects, making it easy to be
productive and flexible at the same time. Those of us that are using
Pyramid successfully went through a learning curve to be sure, but I
haven't
Michael, I wonder if you might give an idea of how you handle that? Do you
manually put forms into templates and validate yourself, or do you still
use a validation library but with custom templates. Just wondering as I
have tried both before.
Ben
On 13 December 2011 15:48, Michael Bayer
I definitely use validation libs, currently we're still on FormEncode (colander
or flatland will be next), but the rendering I do using Mako defs which can be
customized and laid out at the template level which is a lot more WYSIWYG than
using code generators.
A full example of my approach is
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:59 AM, rihad ri...@mail.ru wrote:
On Dec 13, 6:55 am, Mike Orr sluggos...@gmail.com wrote:
Pyramid is a mid-level framework like Pylons. For a
lightweight framework, see web.py, Aspen, Quixote, Flask, Werkzeug, or
several others. Pyramid's focus is on being
On Dec 13, 11:45 pm, Mike Orr sluggos...@gmail.com wrote:
If you have specific questions about which libraries to use on top of
Pyramid, such as which form library to choose, describe what kind of
form API or workflow you expect, and we can suggest something the
most similar. Do you just want
Which is in my view exactly the power of Pyramid. By combining libs that
do one job and do it well (like in The UNIX Way), one can build an
application with Pyramid which is far, far more advanced at given
task(s) than any full-stack solution limited only to what its stack is
mandating.
On Dec 14, 12:23 am, Vlad K. v...@haronmedia.com wrote:
Which is in my view exactly the power of Pyramid. By combining libs that
do one job and do it well (like in The UNIX Way), one can build an
application with Pyramid which is far, far more advanced at given
task(s) than any full-stack
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:29 PM, rihad ri...@mail.ru wrote:
I totally agree. But this comes at a cost: you have to be nearly just
as proficient and experienced as its authors to appreciate its full
power.
Actually it just means you have to read the documentation to use it. You
can't just sit
rihad,
i wonder if you have tried TurboGears 2 or not and if you had what
pushed you away from it. what you are asking for pyramid are already
available with TG.
On 13 Aralık, 22:19, rihad ri...@mail.ru wrote:
On Dec 13, 11:45 pm, Mike Orr sluggos...@gmail.com wrote:
If you have specific
On Dec 13, 2011 8:45 PM, Mike Orr sluggos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:59 AM, rihad ri...@mail.ru wrote:
On Dec 13, 6:55 am, Mike Orr sluggos...@gmail.com wrote:
Pyramid is a mid-level framework like Pylons. For a
lightweight framework, see web.py, Aspen, Quixote,
On Dec 14, 12:55 am, Michael Merickel mmeri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:29 PM, rihad ri...@mail.ru wrote:
I totally agree. But this comes at a cost: you have to be nearly just
as proficient and experienced as its authors to appreciate its full
power.
Actually it just
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 21:51 -0800, rihad wrote:
On Dec 14, 12:55 am, Michael Merickel mmeri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:29 PM, rihad ri...@mail.ru wrote:
I totally agree. But this comes at a cost: you have to be nearly just
as proficient and experienced as its authors to
Hi, all. Does Pyramid (or Sqlalchemy) offer any kind of model
validation? Like, min/max value/length a numerical/textual value may
have. On the same note, how come there's no support for HTML forms? A
form thing which would preferably grab fields from a model to avoid
duplicating stuff. Or are we
it personally.
Ben
On 12 December 2011 10:23, rihad ri...@mail.ru wrote:
Hi, all. Does Pyramid (or Sqlalchemy) offer any kind of model
validation? Like, min/max value/length a numerical/textual value may
have. On the same note, how come there's no support for HTML forms? A
form thing which would
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 02:23 -0800, rihad wrote:
Hi, all. Does Pyramid (or Sqlalchemy) offer any kind of model
validation? Like, min/max value/length a numerical/textual value may
have.
I use Colander for this:
http://docs.pylonsproject.org/projects/colander/en/latest/
Folks also use
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 02:23 -0800, rihad wrote:
Hi, all. Does Pyramid (or Sqlalchemy) offer any kind of model
validation? Like, min/max value/length a numerical/textual value may
have.
I use Colander for this:
http
Great thanks to everyone for the tips.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
pylons-discuss group.
To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Pfff... I've got a confession to make :) All this lightweightedness
makes using Pyramid a bit confusing at first. It's like needing to get
separate Firefox plugins to enable JavaScript, show JPEGs, browse FTP
sites, handle form submission, etc. Dare I say, I find full-stack
frameworks like TG2
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:51 AM, rihad ri...@mail.ru wrote:
Pfff... I've got a confession to make :) All this lightweightedness
makes using Pyramid a bit confusing at first. It's like needing to get
separate Firefox plugins to enable JavaScript, show JPEGs, browse FTP
sites, handle form
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 08:51 -0800, rihad wrote:
Pfff... I've got a confession to make :) All this lightweightedness
makes using Pyramid a bit confusing at first. It's like needing to get
separate Firefox plugins to enable JavaScript, show JPEGs, browse FTP
sites, handle form submission, etc.
H, and yet my company is using pyramid quite successfully where 2 full
stack frameworks have failed us.
Clearly something is wrong. :)
Thomas G. Willis
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:51 AM, rihad ri...@mail.ru wrote:
Pfff... I've got a confession to make :) All this lightweightedness
No they're not the same. I'm developing a complex app based on Pyramid
and I love the fact that Pyramid is lightweight and not assuming things.
It allows me to:
1. choose peppercorn + colander to validate multilevel forms (forms that
are not flat key-value pairs but complex hierarchies),
On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:40 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
I've seen two people
add code to the same package that does the same thing because nobody
really knows how it works anymore.
This reads like the argument people make for off-the-shelf/out-of-the-box,
rather than against it. Unless you
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 18:49 -0500, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Dec 12, 2011, at 2:40 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
I've seen two people
add code to the same package that does the same thing because nobody
really knows how it works anymore.
This reads like the argument people make for
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 8:51 AM, rihad ri...@mail.ru wrote:
Pfff... I've got a confession to make :) All this lightweightedness
makes using Pyramid a bit confusing at first. It's like needing to get
separate Firefox plugins to enable JavaScript, show JPEGs, browse FTP
sites, handle form
50 matches
Mail list logo
