On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 22:44 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Matt Feifarek matt.feifa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
In fact, an argument could be made that if a transaction fails, the
entire contents
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 22:44 -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Matt Feifarek matt.feifa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
In fact, an
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Mike Orr sluggos...@gmail.com wrote:
The transaction should fail when the update query is run, not when it
commits. So you shouldn't set the 'authenticated' flag until the query
finishes without error.
Good advice, but not possible in this case; I'm using
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 11:15 -0500, Matt Feifarek wrote:
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Mike Orr sluggos...@gmail.com
wrote:
The transaction should fail when the update query is run, not
when it
commits. So you shouldn't set the 'authenticated' flag until
the
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Matt Feifarek matt.feifa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Mike Orr sluggos...@gmail.com wrote:
The transaction should fail when the update query is run, not when it
commits. So you shouldn't set the 'authenticated' flag until the query
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
I kinda feel like there is still a larger question here, though...
using transaction manager, code that is executed in a view callable
doesn't *really* finish till after the users' function is over... so
there's no
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
when using transactions, how all-in does
one have to go?
I guess in a sense the answer is none and a lot at the same time.
The transaction machinery provides a hook to do something based on the
commit status. If the
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Michael Merickel mmeri...@gmail.comwrote:
Ben was investigating the idea of tying pyramid_beaker to a transaction,
but I'm not sure if anything ever came of it. Maybe we should resurrect the
idea.
It seems to make sense.
In fact, an argument could be made
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 11:04 -0500, Matt Feifarek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Michael Merickel mmeri...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ben was investigating the idea of tying pyramid_beaker to a
transaction, but I'm not sure if anything ever came of it.
Maybe we should
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
In fact, an argument could be made that if a transaction fails, the
entire contents of the view callable should not execute...
We don't know whether the transaction failed until the view callable
is called. The
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 14:34 -0500, Matt Feifarek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com
wrote:
In fact, an argument could be made that if a transaction
fails, the
entire contents of the view callable should not execute...
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Matt Feifarek matt.feifa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
In fact, an argument could be made that if a transaction fails, the
entire contents of the view callable should not execute...
We don't know
Ben was investigating the idea of tying pyramid_beaker to a transaction, but
I'm not sure if anything ever came of it. Maybe we should resurrect the
idea.
--
Michael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
pylons-discuss group.
To post to this group, send
I am using tm2 in my Pyramid application, and both ZODB and pyramid_mailer
are hooking into that. However, other events related to the request
lifecycle are not aware of transactions and are thusly causing suprising
behavior that might be worth discussion.
For example, I create a new object from
You can register a callback that is called after the transaction ends,
so that the logging can be done there. See this page, near the end of
the linked section:
http://zodb.readthedocs.org/en/latest/transactions.html#repoze-tm2-transaction-aware-middleware-for-wsgi-applications
Carlos de la
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Carlos de la Guardia
carlos.delaguar...@gmail.com wrote:
You can register a callback that is called after the transaction ends,
so that the logging can be done there. See this page, near the end o
That's interesting, but kinda defeats the purpose of logging
16 matches
Mail list logo
