On 31 ene, 00:24, Damjan gdam...@gmail.com wrote:
Damjan, and does ipython works from $PYTHONUSERBASE? because it
doesn't works on virtualenv. If if works then would be another great
advantage :)
Yes it works. I've just installed the distro version of ipython, and
it can import the
;).. pretty good... . not atypical, I'm afraid. Nothing wrong with Java,
per se.. but Sun tried to make it an 'industry' (and I suppose in some sense
it is), but when you're trying to build an 'industry', you have to let a lot
of people in who maybe shouldn't be there (like IBM, and Oracle).. and
Thanks. I have probably been lucky to not have had the opportunity of
having GWT inflicted on any of my projects, but your appreciation of
GWT resonates very true -- and with many projects java... the problem
probably is that google was constrained to hire too quickly, so after
having
Michael Bayer wrote:
(we of course ultimately rewrote the whole thing in pylons)
This.
same database code and database (remember we're still in java), the
components rendered about 50 times faster.
And this. What have you gained from Pylons? Development speed or
performance as well?
Regards,
Tycon wrote:
I'm planning on using GWT only for client side code and doing all
server calls
using JSON, and not using GWT's RPC mechanism. So I guess that would
avoid the problem you are talking about ?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but neither Perl/CGI not Pylons/Rails etc
CANNOT
be used to
The point of GWT is that you can use java for the client side code,
with most
of its core libraries, and you get better optimized javascript, and
much better
development environment and tools (IDE, debugger).
This is superior compared to using any javascript framework, none of
which offers
the
I know about the pep and how python source files are encoded, but the
interactive shell is something completely different. I wonder on what
local env variable does shell depend. Since I have all of them
either sl_SI.UTF8 or en_GB.UTF-8.
The Python interactive shell depends on the locale
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 8:55 AM, jerry jerryji1...@gmail.com wrote:
the enterprise way of thinking is what's brought us the economic
disaster, vast ponzi schemes where everyone looks the other way,
etc. I.e. seems to work for now so fuck it.
Bravo, Bravo, and BRAVO!
This is so
because it's not ready so it's just a toy at this point, just like
pyjamas, while GWT is used by real production websites (ever heard of
gmail)
On Jan 31, 5:54 pm, Alberto Valverde albe...@toscat.net wrote:
Tycon wrote:
The point of GWT is that you can use java for the client side code,
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Tycon adie...@gmail.com wrote:
because it's not ready so it's just a toy at this point, just like
pyjamas, while GWT is used by real production websites (ever heard of
gmail)
Actually all I have heard is the opposite. In fact one of GWT's
biggest but is that
On Jan 31, 2009, at 4:28 PM, Tycon wrote:
I'm planning on using GWT only for client side code and doing all
server calls
using JSON, and not using GWT's RPC mechanism. So I guess that would
avoid the problem you are talking about ?
or you could just use jquery...ive no idea how you'd use
If you are serious about perusing this path, please consider Seam/RichFaces
before doing so.
- Original Message
From: Tycon adie...@gmail.com
To: pylons-discuss pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 6:21:28 PM
Subject: Re: Pylons vs Tomcat+GWT
The point
I'm not talking about facebook/youtube type sites, I'm talking about a
real web application
where users access information, enter information, search and analyze
information, and visualize information.
I'm not creating web sites for popularity contests, but using the web
as a platform for real
My vote has to go to ThunderCats: Jaga on the backend with Cheetara
for templating.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
pylons-discuss group.
To post to this group, send email to
14 matches
Mail list logo
