Previously Mike Orr wrote:
AuthKit's author James Gardner says the architecture is sound, the
outstanding bugs have been fixed, and the two substantial chapters in
the Pylons Book space on the wiki have been audited for Pylons 0.9.6.
Against this are 4-5 people on IRC and this list who have
Fellow earthicans...
I have still the writing of my Beginning Pylons article on my todo
list somewhere in the upper third. :) However recent project work and my
family kept me from really putting any work into it.
However I had a lazier idea a while ago which was creating a couple of
My problems whith authkit:
I can't say nothing about authkit docs. My english is very bad. I
can't judge it. The code is clear ;-)
AuthKit has many config options. This is a good think. In my work, the
people is mad. Many options for flexibility are welcome.
In SVN version, you have a
Jorge Vargas wrote:
this comes as a shock to me, I though authkit was defacto just like
mako, SA,etc. I'm just starting to read up on authkit, and so far I
though it only had outdated documentation, but the fact that noone has
back it up as a good path in this thread makes me wonder if I'm
Ian Bicking wrote:
Some time ago I wrote this up as a proposal for the basic way
authentication can work in WSGI:
http://wsgi.org/wsgi/Specifications/simple_authentication
I think most of the systems work pretty much like this, but I don't know
for sure.
Ian, that's exactly what I
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
There is an important lesson here: a very important, if not the most
important, factor for adaption of a tool such as AuthKit is the quality
of its documentation and how easy it is for complete newcomers to start
using it.
I don't agree here. AuthKit is good enough
I lack the expertise to judge the relative merits of subtly different
authentication/authorization strategies vis a vis Pylons. I do know,
however, that, as a Pylons end user, I need a fundamentally sound
and practical authentication/authorization mechanism, and it's the
last thing I want to have
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 4:23 PM, mdoudoroff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, I can confirm that the AuthKit documentation situation
is appalling. I spent hours sifting through the obsolete Pylons book
chapters, their comments, the source code, and the cookbook documents
before
