Previously Roberto Allende wrote:
Wichert Akkerman escribió:
Previously Dalius Dobravolskas wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Roberto Allende ro...@menttes.com wrote:
My motivation is to write a unit testing but even in other cases it
could have sense to
Mike Orr wrote:
'c' -- as well as the other context globals (request, response,
session, cache, app_globals, and config) -- are StackedObjectProxy
objects. This allows multiple instances of Pylons applications to
exist in the same process and share the module globals. With
Mark Hildreth wrote:
hasattr returns true because of the way that tmpl_context (c) is
implemented.
https://www.knowledgetap.com/hg/pylons-dev/file/98d7b9278acd/pylons/util.py#l115
You have ContextObj, and AttribSafeContextObj. By default, Pylons uses
AttribSafeContextObj. Looking at the
That's it I'm switching to Lisp. L8r suxx0rs!
/kidding
Tycon wrote:
Benchmarks indicate it is taking as much as 20% of request handling
time (not including the user action).
The question is why is it even necessary to use this registry
facility ?
Similarly, other request handling
Tycon wrote:
Benchmarks indicate it is taking as much as 20% of request handling
time (not including the user action).
So, taking into account that 96.7% of the time of a request is inside
the user action(empirically proved by the extensive benchmarks I've
made which Im not going to
On Jan 19, 2009, at 10:37 PM, Tycon wrote:
Benchmarks indicate it is taking as much as 20% of request handling
time (not including the user action).
Curious, I've done rather extensive benchmarks and never seen the
registry middleware as being such a chunk. Can you elaborate?
The
On Jan 19, 2009, at 11:04 AM, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
any chance the next version of beaker will be better integrated with
pylons so it doesn't flush to the datastore on ever save(
The current code in trunk does not actually do the 'real' save until
the end of the request, no matter how
Hi Ben (and Pylons list).
I've been thinking of buying The Definitive Guide to Pylons from Apress,
but am realizing that I'd rather read it on-screen (syntax-highlighting,
search, cut-n-paste, etc.) BUT, I know that writing books is one of the ways
that contributors to Free Software can make a
I am a bit short of cash at the moment but I too would like to donate at
some point. It's amazing how much has gotten done without support. I
don't work for free and I don't expect others to do so. Pylons is
helping me generate income(or will shortly)
-patrick
Matt Feifarek wrote:
Hi Ben
You do realize that Apress also sells the book in electronic (PDF)
format, which you can search in, cut and paste from and such, right...?
Thorsten
On Jan 20, 2009, at 10:06 , Matt Feifarek wrote:
Hi Ben (and Pylons list).
I've been thinking of buying The Definitive Guide to Pylons from
No, I did not.
But anyway, PDF sucks (no color-coding, no download links, hard to read
compared to a browser, etc.) I'm hoping for http://pylonsbook.com/
But if Ben's preference is that we should buy the PDF, I might just do that.
I'd just rather a more direct approach.
But thanks for the tip.
My understanding is that the online version at http://pylonsbook.com/
is in the process of being updated to what was released on paper (and
in PDF) as well.
That said, PDF can certainly have color-coding and clickable links. I
forget whether the Pylons book in PDF format does.
Thorsten
On
Matt Feifarek wrote:
Hi Ben (and Pylons list).
I've been thinking of buying The Definitive Guide to Pylons from
Apress, but am realizing that I'd rather read it on-screen
(syntax-highlighting, search, cut-n-paste, etc.) BUT, I know that
writing books is one of the ways that
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Thorsten Lockert tlock...@gmail.comwrote:
You do realize that Apress also sells the book in electronic (PDF) format,
which you can search in, cut and paste from and such, right...?
On Jan 20, 10:35 am, Matt Feifarek matt.feifa...@gmail.com wrote:
No, I
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Ben Bangert b...@groovie.org wrote:
Similarly, other request handling operations such as creating the
request object may also be redundant, because the user may not be
interested in all the attributes of the request object. So wouldn't it
be better to provide
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Wyatt Baldwin
wyatt.lee.bald...@gmail.comwrote:
I haven't seen the PDF, but there's no reason it couldn't have syntax
highlighting or download links is there? Does anyone know if it does?
The sample-chapter PDF that they have has no code examples, but there's
Matt Feifarek wrote:
Hi Ben (and Pylons list).
I've been thinking of buying The Definitive Guide to Pylons from
Apress, but am realizing that I'd rather read it on-screen
(syntax-highlighting, search, cut-n-paste, etc.) BUT, I know that
writing books is one of the ways that contributors to
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Mike Orr sluggos...@gmail.com wrote:
Matt Feifarek wrote:
Hi Ben (and Pylons list).
I've been thinking of buying The Definitive Guide to Pylons from
Apress, but am realizing that I'd rather read it on-screen
(syntax-highlighting, search, cut-n-paste, etc.)
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Noah Gift noah.g...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Mike Orr sluggos...@gmail.com wrote:
Noah has been musing about setting up a nonprofit or leveraging a
nonprofit (like the PSF) for the purpose of collecting donations to
support
empirical data is that if you comment out the RegistryManager in
config/middleware.py, you get much better req/sec (but you cant use
any of the gloabals...).
In fact, isn't the whole purpose of this registry facility to enable
request-local objects (such as the request object) to be accessed as
On Jan 20, 3:49 pm, Tycon adie...@gmail.com wrote:
empirical data is that if you comment out the RegistryManager in
config/middleware.py, you get much better req/sec (but you cant use
any of the gloabals...).
Or, to be more precise, the empirical data YOU have is that when YOU
comment out the
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Tycon adie...@gmail.com wrote:
empirical data is that if you comment out the RegistryManager in
config/middleware.py, you get much better req/sec (but you cant use
any of the gloabals...).
In fact, isn't the whole purpose of this registry facility to enable
On Jan 19, 10:24 pm, Graham Dumpleton graham.dumple...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would agree that need to start looking towards WSGI 2.0 and Python
3.0 would be a good trigger for that.
+1 on that. If there was ever a time to make a move, this is it, where
we have preexisting breaks in backward
I have a simple Pylons controller that responds to PUT requests with a
204 (No Content) status and no entity body. For example (stripped
down)::
class DataController(BaseController):
def test_put(self):
do_something()
response.status = 204 # No content
In MVC *M*odel should be abstract layer of data and hide data
representation and real method access giving: universal, good
described, readable and simple interface to manage this data: add,
remove, get all, get one etc... methods.
Commonly I use Pylons. In the last lesson of my University of
woot!!!
On Jan 20, 12:38 pm, Ben Bangert b...@groovie.org wrote:
On Jan 19, 2009, at 11:04 AM, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
any chance the next version of beaker will be better integrated with
pylons so it doesn't flush to the datastore on ever save(
The current code in trunk does not
26 matches
Mail list logo
