On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Tycon adie...@gmail.com wrote:
Python is so messed up, the only explanation is that the people making
it up are blindly following misguided principles.
Since it's so easy to make a web framework in Python, why don't you
make your own and then you won't have to
I want to add some administrative console tools next to my 0.9.7
Pylons application (e.g. a backup/restore). I want to make use of
some parameter settings in the development.ini or production.ini,
but I don't need any wsgi stuff. What is the best and easiest way to
start up the console
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:31 AM, cropr ruben.dec...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to add some administrative console tools next to my 0.9.7
Pylons application (e.g. a backup/restore). I want to make use of
some parameter settings in the development.ini or production.ini,
but I don't need any
Thanks
That is what I am looking for
cropr
On 23 jan, 10:03, Mike Orr sluggos...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:31 AM, cropr ruben.dec...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to add some administrative console tools next to my 0.9.7
Pylons application (e.g. a backup/restore). I want to
Previously Mike Orr wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:31 AM, cropr ruben.dec...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to add some administrative console tools next to my 0.9.7
Pylons application (e.g. a backup/restore). I want to make use of
some parameter settings in the development.ini or
I'm getting an error while trying to get sources from svn co
http://routes.groovie.org/svn/trunk routes
svn: Server sent unexpected return value (405 Method Not Allowed) in
response to PROPFIND request for '/svn/trunk'
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:05 PM, przemek.ch przemek...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm getting an error while trying to get sources from svn co
http://routes.groovie.org/svn/trunk routes
svn: Server sent unexpected return value (405 Method Not Allowed) in
response to PROPFIND request for '/svn/trunk'
I was just responding to other people's posts, and I'm not the only
person to ever criticize python (while still acknoledging its
strengths).
On Jan 23, 1:45 am, Alberto Valverde albe...@toscat.net wrote:
Mike Orr wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Tycon adie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 19, 2009, at 8:05 PM, Mike Orr wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 4:05 PM, walterbyrd walterb...@iname.com
wrote:
And if so, why?
Everybody who uses Pylons knows that other frameworks exist and had
maybe tried one or two others, but has made a conscious choice that
they like Pylons'
what a strange post. There are no unicode issues in WSGI, and the
usage of WSGI in the generic sense doesn't complicate things to any
degree - the spec is just a single function call.If there are Py3K
issues in Paste, lets first make it clear that *every* application
that deals explicitly
well put.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Michael Bayer zzz...@gmail.com wrote:
what a strange post. There are no unicode issues in WSGI, and the
usage of WSGI in the generic sense doesn't complicate things to any
degree - the spec is just a single function call.If there are Py3K
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 07:05 -0800, Michael Bayer wrote:
The only price Pylons is paying is it assumes the developer would like
to consider how his application should be architected, instead of
those decisions being made implicitly and invisibly. This is a
cultural situation created by the
+1 I agree.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:53 PM, Marcus Cavanaugh
marcuscavana...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 19, 10:24 pm, Graham Dumpleton graham.dumple...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would agree that need to start looking towards WSGI 2.0 and Python
3.0 would be a good trigger for that.
+1 on that.
mk wrote:
Somewhat off topic, where I work (software group at big IT corporation)
there is lots and lots of resistance towards dynamic typing. It *is*
felt that dynamic typing, even in the model of strong dynamic typing of
Python, belongs precisely to the realm of hobbyist languages like
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:31 AM, cropr ruben.dec...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to add some administrative console tools next to my 0.9.7
Pylons application (e.g. a backup/restore). I want to make use of
some parameter settings in the development.ini or production.ini,
but I don't need any wsgi
I think Pylons should only support Authentication as in http auth that
is supported by Apache/Nginx/Etc , and things like mod_auth / ldap /
etc.
It would be nice if it supported some sort of tie-in with services
that proxy to/from it to make that auth persist.
But everything else that people do
On Jan 23, 2009, at 9:22 AM, Tom Longson (nym) wrote:
I'm worried about the state of authentication in pylons. I don't know
what I'd recommend to someone else for authentication if they were to
start building something, and I think this is a big stumbling point
with pylons as a web framework. I
Tom Longson (nym) wrote:
I'm worried about the state of authentication in pylons. I don't know
what I'd recommend to someone else for authentication if they were to
start building something, and I think this is a big stumbling point
with pylons as a web framework. I understand not everyone
Ben Bangert wrote:
There is no auth in Pylons, its beyond the scope.
I think I agree, but a note:
Pretty much every site I've built has stored users differently, some
have permissions, some just use groups, some just use permissions.
To be clear -- Authentication and Authorization are two
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Christopher Barker
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
Ben Bangert wrote:
There is no auth in Pylons, its beyond the scope.
I think I agree, but a note:
Pretty much every site I've built has stored users differently, some
have permissions, some just use groups,
On Friday January 23, 2009 22:34:25 Mike Orr wrote:
repoze.what can handle authorization for at least some sites, but I'm
not sure how finished it is.
Out-of-the-box, repoze.what v1 supports the groups/permissions authorization
pattern like AuthKit, but allows you to store such
On 24/01/2009, at 8:34 AM, Mike Orr wrote:
repoze.who solves the authentication issue, which as you say is both
the biggest security concern and the mos standardized problem (how
convenient).
repoze.what can handle authorization for at least some sites, but I'm
not sure how finished it
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Chris Miles miles.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to see the Pylons quickstart template offer an
authentication/authorization solution as an option, in the same way
that it offers a DB/ORM solution (SQLAlchemy) so the user can get
started quickly. Many
On 24/01/2009, at 2:02 PM, Mike Orr wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Chris Miles miles.ch...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'd like to see the Pylons quickstart template offer an
authentication/authorization solution as an option, in the same way
that it offers a DB/ORM solution (SQLAlchemy)
Hi !
IMHO present documentations composed into site lite is a bad idea.
Standard Sphinx generated site was better: more coherent, looks nicer.
Contrast between white documentations background and brown layout is
too high for me, I can't read documentation. My eyes is tortured. IMHO
leaving
On Jan 23, 2009, at 10:19 PM, Jan Koprowski wrote:
IMHO present documentations composed into site lite is a bad idea.
Standard Sphinx generated site was better: more coherent, looks nicer.
Contrast between white documentations background and brown layout is
too high for me, I can't read
26 matches
Mail list logo
