Re: Recommended production deployment

2009-01-13 Thread Colin Flanagan
Performance considerations aside, why is mod_wsgi a hack? Because it doesn't perform as wel as other solutions? Can you address your concerns about the implementation vs the performance benchmarks? - Original Message From: Tycon adie...@gmail.com To: pylons-discuss

Re: Django or Pylons - comparison details

2009-01-19 Thread Colin Flanagan
The SQLAlchemy argument is a very compelling one. I have an application that, while being a CMS, has heavily relational data. I was urged by different people to do it either in Django or Plone, but went with Pylons. My domain objects are far easier to work with, though I did suffer from the

Re: Pylons vs Tomcat+GWT

2009-01-31 Thread Colin Flanagan
If you are serious about perusing this path, please consider Seam/RichFaces before doing so. - Original Message From: Tycon adie...@gmail.com To: pylons-discuss pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 6:21:28 PM Subject: Re: Pylons vs Tomcat+GWT The point

Re: Pylons vs Tomcat+GWT

2009-02-02 Thread Colin Flanagan
Hopefully we can end this discussion soon, but it may be worth noting that GWT was first concieved in an era where javascript libraries hadn't yet evolved to what they are today (especially with regard to jquery) and backend developers, especially Java ones, were extremely gun-shy at delving